Cargando…

The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality

A simple index that reflects the potential eating quality of beef carcasses is very important for producer feedback. The Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Index reflects variation in carcass quality due to factors that are influenced by producers (hot carcass weight, rib fat depth, hump height, marblin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGilchrist, P., Polkinghorne, R.J., Ball, A.J., Thompson, J.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30724139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003713
_version_ 1783436517397495808
author McGilchrist, P.
Polkinghorne, R.J.
Ball, A.J.
Thompson, J.M.
author_facet McGilchrist, P.
Polkinghorne, R.J.
Ball, A.J.
Thompson, J.M.
author_sort McGilchrist, P.
collection PubMed
description A simple index that reflects the potential eating quality of beef carcasses is very important for producer feedback. The Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Index reflects variation in carcass quality due to factors that are influenced by producers (hot carcass weight, rib fat depth, hump height, marbling and ossification scores along with milk fed veal category, direct or saleyard consignment, hormonal growth promotant status and sex). In addition, processor impacts on meat quality are standardised so that the MSA Index could be compared across time, breed and geographical regions. Hence, the MSA Index was calculated using achilles hung carcasses, aged for 5 days postmortem. Muscle pH can be impacted by production, transport, lairage or processing factors, hence the MSA Index assumes a constant pH of 5.6 and loin temperature of 7(o)C for all carcasses. To quantify the cut weight distribution of the 39 MSA cuts in the carcass, 40 Angus steers were sourced from the low (n=13), high (n=15) and myostatin (n=12) muscling selection lines. The left side of each carcass was processed down to the 39 trimmed MSA cuts. There was no difference in MSA cut distribution between the low and high muscling lines (P>0.05), although there were differences with nine cuts from the myostatin line (P<0.05). There was no difference in the MSA Index calculated using actual muscle percentages and using the average from the low and high muscling lines (R (2)=0.99). Different cooking methods impacted via a constant offset between eating quality and carcass input traits (R (2)=1). The MSA Index calculated for the four most commercially important cuts was highly related to the index calculated using all 39 MSA cuts (R (2)=0.98), whilst the accuracy was lower for an index calculated using the striploin (R (2)=0.82). Therefore, the MSA Index was calculated as the sum of the 39 eating quality scores predicted at 5 days ageing, based on their most common cooking method, weighted by the proportions of the individual cut relative to total weight of all cuts. The MSA Index provides producers with a tool to assess the impact of management and genetic changes on the predicted eating quality of the carcass. The MSA Index could also be utilised for benchmarking and to track eating quality trends at farm, supply chain, regional, state or national levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6639719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66397192019-07-29 The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality McGilchrist, P. Polkinghorne, R.J. Ball, A.J. Thompson, J.M. Animal Research Article A simple index that reflects the potential eating quality of beef carcasses is very important for producer feedback. The Meat Standards Australia (MSA) Index reflects variation in carcass quality due to factors that are influenced by producers (hot carcass weight, rib fat depth, hump height, marbling and ossification scores along with milk fed veal category, direct or saleyard consignment, hormonal growth promotant status and sex). In addition, processor impacts on meat quality are standardised so that the MSA Index could be compared across time, breed and geographical regions. Hence, the MSA Index was calculated using achilles hung carcasses, aged for 5 days postmortem. Muscle pH can be impacted by production, transport, lairage or processing factors, hence the MSA Index assumes a constant pH of 5.6 and loin temperature of 7(o)C for all carcasses. To quantify the cut weight distribution of the 39 MSA cuts in the carcass, 40 Angus steers were sourced from the low (n=13), high (n=15) and myostatin (n=12) muscling selection lines. The left side of each carcass was processed down to the 39 trimmed MSA cuts. There was no difference in MSA cut distribution between the low and high muscling lines (P>0.05), although there were differences with nine cuts from the myostatin line (P<0.05). There was no difference in the MSA Index calculated using actual muscle percentages and using the average from the low and high muscling lines (R (2)=0.99). Different cooking methods impacted via a constant offset between eating quality and carcass input traits (R (2)=1). The MSA Index calculated for the four most commercially important cuts was highly related to the index calculated using all 39 MSA cuts (R (2)=0.98), whilst the accuracy was lower for an index calculated using the striploin (R (2)=0.82). Therefore, the MSA Index was calculated as the sum of the 39 eating quality scores predicted at 5 days ageing, based on their most common cooking method, weighted by the proportions of the individual cut relative to total weight of all cuts. The MSA Index provides producers with a tool to assess the impact of management and genetic changes on the predicted eating quality of the carcass. The MSA Index could also be utilised for benchmarking and to track eating quality trends at farm, supply chain, regional, state or national levels. Cambridge University Press 2019-02-07 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6639719/ /pubmed/30724139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003713 Text en © The Animal Consortium 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncsa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncsa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGilchrist, P.
Polkinghorne, R.J.
Ball, A.J.
Thompson, J.M.
The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title_full The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title_fullStr The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title_full_unstemmed The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title_short The Meat Standards Australia Index indicates beef carcass quality
title_sort meat standards australia index indicates beef carcass quality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6639719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30724139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003713
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgilchristp themeatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT polkinghornerj themeatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT ballaj themeatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT thompsonjm themeatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT mcgilchristp meatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT polkinghornerj meatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT ballaj meatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality
AT thompsonjm meatstandardsaustraliaindexindicatesbeefcarcassquality