Cargando…

The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development

BACKGROUND: Mouse clinical trials (MCTs) are becoming wildly used in pre-clinical oncology drug development, but a statistical framework is yet to be developed. In this study, we establish such as framework and provide general guidelines on the design, analysis and application of MCTs. METHODS: We s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Sheng, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Mao, Binchen, Li, Qi-Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7
_version_ 1783437103574548480
author Guo, Sheng
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Mao, Binchen
Li, Qi-Xiang
author_facet Guo, Sheng
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Mao, Binchen
Li, Qi-Xiang
author_sort Guo, Sheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mouse clinical trials (MCTs) are becoming wildly used in pre-clinical oncology drug development, but a statistical framework is yet to be developed. In this study, we establish such as framework and provide general guidelines on the design, analysis and application of MCTs. METHODS: We systematically analyzed tumor growth data from a large collection of PDX, CDX and syngeneic mouse tumor models to evaluate multiple efficacy end points, and to introduce statistical methods for modeling MCTs. RESULTS: We established empirical quantitative relationships between mouse number and measurement accuracy for categorical and continuous efficacy endpoints, and showed that more mice are needed to achieve given accuracy for syngeneic models than for PDXs and CDXs. There is considerable disagreement between methods on calling drug responses as objective response. We then introduced linear mixed models (LMMs) to describe MCTs as clustered longitudinal studies, which explicitly model growth and drug response heterogeneities across mouse models and among mice within a mouse model. Case studies were used to demonstrate the advantages of LMMs in discovering biomarkers and exploring drug’s mechanisms of action. We introduced additive frailty models to perform survival analysis on MCTs, which more accurately estimate hazard ratios by modeling the clustered mouse population. We performed computational simulations for LMMs and frailty models to generate statistical power curves, and showed that power is close for designs with similar total number of mice. Finally, we showed that MCTs can explain discrepant results in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Methods proposed in this study can make the design and analysis of MCTs more rational, flexible and powerful, make MCTs a better tool in oncology research and drug development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6643318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66433182019-07-29 The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development Guo, Sheng Jiang, Xiaoqian Mao, Binchen Li, Qi-Xiang BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Mouse clinical trials (MCTs) are becoming wildly used in pre-clinical oncology drug development, but a statistical framework is yet to be developed. In this study, we establish such as framework and provide general guidelines on the design, analysis and application of MCTs. METHODS: We systematically analyzed tumor growth data from a large collection of PDX, CDX and syngeneic mouse tumor models to evaluate multiple efficacy end points, and to introduce statistical methods for modeling MCTs. RESULTS: We established empirical quantitative relationships between mouse number and measurement accuracy for categorical and continuous efficacy endpoints, and showed that more mice are needed to achieve given accuracy for syngeneic models than for PDXs and CDXs. There is considerable disagreement between methods on calling drug responses as objective response. We then introduced linear mixed models (LMMs) to describe MCTs as clustered longitudinal studies, which explicitly model growth and drug response heterogeneities across mouse models and among mice within a mouse model. Case studies were used to demonstrate the advantages of LMMs in discovering biomarkers and exploring drug’s mechanisms of action. We introduced additive frailty models to perform survival analysis on MCTs, which more accurately estimate hazard ratios by modeling the clustered mouse population. We performed computational simulations for LMMs and frailty models to generate statistical power curves, and showed that power is close for designs with similar total number of mice. Finally, we showed that MCTs can explain discrepant results in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Methods proposed in this study can make the design and analysis of MCTs more rational, flexible and powerful, make MCTs a better tool in oncology research and drug development. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6643318/ /pubmed/31331301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Sheng
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Mao, Binchen
Li, Qi-Xiang
The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title_full The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title_fullStr The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title_full_unstemmed The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title_short The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
title_sort design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guosheng thedesignanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT jiangxiaoqian thedesignanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT maobinchen thedesignanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT liqixiang thedesignanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT guosheng designanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT jiangxiaoqian designanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT maobinchen designanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment
AT liqixiang designanalysisandapplicationofmouseclinicaltrialsinoncologydrugdevelopment