Cargando…

How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI

BACKGROUND: Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common phenotype induced by endosymbiont Wolbachia and results in embryonic lethality when Wolbachia-modified sperm fertilize eggs without Wolbachia. However, eggs carrying the same strain of Wolbachia can rescue this embryonic death, thus pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Zhen, Zheng, Ya, Yu, Wen-Juan, Fang, Yang, Mao, Bin, Wang, Yu-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6
_version_ 1783438759863255040
author He, Zhen
Zheng, Ya
Yu, Wen-Juan
Fang, Yang
Mao, Bin
Wang, Yu-Feng
author_facet He, Zhen
Zheng, Ya
Yu, Wen-Juan
Fang, Yang
Mao, Bin
Wang, Yu-Feng
author_sort He, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common phenotype induced by endosymbiont Wolbachia and results in embryonic lethality when Wolbachia-modified sperm fertilize eggs without Wolbachia. However, eggs carrying the same strain of Wolbachia can rescue this embryonic death, thus producing viable Wolbachia-infected offspring. Hence Wolbachia can be transmitted mainly by hosts’ eggs. One of the models explaining CI is “titration-restitution”, which hypothesized that Wolbachia titrated-out some factors from the sperm and the Wolbachia in the egg would restitute the factors after fertilization. However, how infected eggs rescue CI and how hosts’ eggs ensure the proliferation and transmission of Wolbachia are not well understood. RESULTS: By RNA-seq analyses, we first compared the transcription profiles of Drosophila melanogaster adult ovaries with and without the wMel Wolbachia and identified 149 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which 116 genes were upregulated and 33 were downregulated by Wolbachia infection. To confirm the results obtained from RNA-seq and to screen genes potentially associated with reproduction, 15 DEGs were selected for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Thirteen genes showed the same changing trend as RNA-seq analyses. To test whether these genes are associated with CI, we also detected their expression levels in testes. Nine of them exhibited different changing trends in testes from those in ovaries. To investigate how these DEGs were regulated, sRNA sequencing was performed and identified seven microRNAs (miRNAs) that were all upregulated in fly ovaries by Wolbachia infection. Matching of miRNA and mRNA data showed that these seven miRNAs regulated 15 DEGs. Wolbachia-responsive genes in fly ovaries were involved in biological processes including metabolism, transportation, oxidation-reduction, immunity, and development. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of mRNA and miRNA data from fly ovaries revealed 149 mRNAs and seven miRNAs that exhibit significant changes in expression due to Wolbachia infection. Notably, most of the DEGs showed variation in opposite directions in ovaries versus testes in the presence of Wolbachia, which generally supports the “titration-restitution” model for CI. Furthermore, genes related to metabolism were upregulated, which may benefit maximum proliferation and transmission of Wolbachia. This provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI and Wolbachia dependence on host ovaries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6657171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66571712019-07-31 How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI He, Zhen Zheng, Ya Yu, Wen-Juan Fang, Yang Mao, Bin Wang, Yu-Feng BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common phenotype induced by endosymbiont Wolbachia and results in embryonic lethality when Wolbachia-modified sperm fertilize eggs without Wolbachia. However, eggs carrying the same strain of Wolbachia can rescue this embryonic death, thus producing viable Wolbachia-infected offspring. Hence Wolbachia can be transmitted mainly by hosts’ eggs. One of the models explaining CI is “titration-restitution”, which hypothesized that Wolbachia titrated-out some factors from the sperm and the Wolbachia in the egg would restitute the factors after fertilization. However, how infected eggs rescue CI and how hosts’ eggs ensure the proliferation and transmission of Wolbachia are not well understood. RESULTS: By RNA-seq analyses, we first compared the transcription profiles of Drosophila melanogaster adult ovaries with and without the wMel Wolbachia and identified 149 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which 116 genes were upregulated and 33 were downregulated by Wolbachia infection. To confirm the results obtained from RNA-seq and to screen genes potentially associated with reproduction, 15 DEGs were selected for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Thirteen genes showed the same changing trend as RNA-seq analyses. To test whether these genes are associated with CI, we also detected their expression levels in testes. Nine of them exhibited different changing trends in testes from those in ovaries. To investigate how these DEGs were regulated, sRNA sequencing was performed and identified seven microRNAs (miRNAs) that were all upregulated in fly ovaries by Wolbachia infection. Matching of miRNA and mRNA data showed that these seven miRNAs regulated 15 DEGs. Wolbachia-responsive genes in fly ovaries were involved in biological processes including metabolism, transportation, oxidation-reduction, immunity, and development. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of mRNA and miRNA data from fly ovaries revealed 149 mRNAs and seven miRNAs that exhibit significant changes in expression due to Wolbachia infection. Notably, most of the DEGs showed variation in opposite directions in ovaries versus testes in the presence of Wolbachia, which generally supports the “titration-restitution” model for CI. Furthermore, genes related to metabolism were upregulated, which may benefit maximum proliferation and transmission of Wolbachia. This provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI and Wolbachia dependence on host ovaries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6657171/ /pubmed/31340757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Zhen
Zheng, Ya
Yu, Wen-Juan
Fang, Yang
Mao, Bin
Wang, Yu-Feng
How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title_full How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title_fullStr How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title_full_unstemmed How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title_short How do Wolbachia modify the Drosophila ovary? New evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of Wolbachia-induced CI
title_sort how do wolbachia modify the drosophila ovary? new evidences support the “titration-restitution” model for the mechanisms of wolbachia-induced ci
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5977-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hezhen howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci
AT zhengya howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci
AT yuwenjuan howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci
AT fangyang howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci
AT maobin howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci
AT wangyufeng howdowolbachiamodifythedrosophilaovarynewevidencessupportthetitrationrestitutionmodelforthemechanismsofwolbachiainducedci