Cargando…

The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E is a glycoprotein best known as a mediator and regulator of lipid transport and uptake. The APOE-ε4 allele has long been associated with increased risks of Alzheimer's disease and mortality, but the effect of the less prevalent APOE-ε2 allele on diseases in the elde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolters, Frank J., Yang, Qiong, Biggs, Mary L., Jakobsdottir, Johanna, Li, Shuo, Evans, Daniel S., Bis, Joshua C., Harris, Tamara B., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Zilhao, Nuno R., Ghanbari, Mohsen, Ikram, M. Arfan, Launer, Lenore, Psaty, Bruce M., Tranah, Gregory J., Kulminski, Alexander M., Gudnason, Vilmundur, Seshadri, Sudha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219668
_version_ 1783439748705026048
author Wolters, Frank J.
Yang, Qiong
Biggs, Mary L.
Jakobsdottir, Johanna
Li, Shuo
Evans, Daniel S.
Bis, Joshua C.
Harris, Tamara B.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Zilhao, Nuno R.
Ghanbari, Mohsen
Ikram, M. Arfan
Launer, Lenore
Psaty, Bruce M.
Tranah, Gregory J.
Kulminski, Alexander M.
Gudnason, Vilmundur
Seshadri, Sudha
author_facet Wolters, Frank J.
Yang, Qiong
Biggs, Mary L.
Jakobsdottir, Johanna
Li, Shuo
Evans, Daniel S.
Bis, Joshua C.
Harris, Tamara B.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Zilhao, Nuno R.
Ghanbari, Mohsen
Ikram, M. Arfan
Launer, Lenore
Psaty, Bruce M.
Tranah, Gregory J.
Kulminski, Alexander M.
Gudnason, Vilmundur
Seshadri, Sudha
author_sort Wolters, Frank J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E is a glycoprotein best known as a mediator and regulator of lipid transport and uptake. The APOE-ε4 allele has long been associated with increased risks of Alzheimer's disease and mortality, but the effect of the less prevalent APOE-ε2 allele on diseases in the elderly and survival remains elusive. METHODS: We aggregated data of 38,537 individuals of European ancestry (mean age 65.5 years; 55.6% women) from six population-based cohort studies (Rotterdam Study, AGES-Reykjavik Study, Cardiovascular Health Study, Health-ABC Study, and the family-based Framingham Heart Study and Long Life Family Study) to determine the association of APOE, and in particular APOE-ε2, with survival in the population. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 11.7 years, 17,021 individuals died. Compared with homozygous APOE-ε3 carriers, APOE-ε2 carriers were at lower risk of death (hazard ratio,95% confidence interval: 0.94,0.90–0.99; P = 1.1*10(−2)), whereas APOE-ε4 carriers were at increased risk of death (HR 1.17,1.12–1.21; P = 2.8*10(−16)). APOE was associated with mortality risk in a dose-dependent manner, with risk estimates lowest for homozygous APOE-ε2 (HR 0.89,0.74–1.08), and highest for homozygous APOE-ε4 (HR 1.52,1.37–1.70). After censoring for dementia, effect estimates remained similar for APOE-ε2 (HR 0.95,0.90–1.01), but attenuated for APOE-ε4 (HR 1.07,1.01–1.12). Results were broadly similar across cohorts, and did not differ by age or sex. APOE genotype was associated with baseline lipid fractions (e.g. mean difference(95%CI) in LDL(mg/dL) for ε2 versus ε33: -17.1(-18.1–16.0), and ε4 versus ε33: +5.7(4.8;6.5)), but the association between APOE and mortality was unaltered after adjustment for baseline LDL or cardiovascular disease. Given the European ancestry of the study population, results may not apply to other ethnicities. CONCLUSION: Compared with APOE-ε3, APOE-ε2 is associated with prolonged survival, whereas mortality risk is increased for APOE-ε4 carriers. Further collaborative efforts are needed to unravel the role of APOE and in particular APOE-ε2 in health and disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6663005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66630052019-08-07 The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE) Wolters, Frank J. Yang, Qiong Biggs, Mary L. Jakobsdottir, Johanna Li, Shuo Evans, Daniel S. Bis, Joshua C. Harris, Tamara B. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Zilhao, Nuno R. Ghanbari, Mohsen Ikram, M. Arfan Launer, Lenore Psaty, Bruce M. Tranah, Gregory J. Kulminski, Alexander M. Gudnason, Vilmundur Seshadri, Sudha PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E is a glycoprotein best known as a mediator and regulator of lipid transport and uptake. The APOE-ε4 allele has long been associated with increased risks of Alzheimer's disease and mortality, but the effect of the less prevalent APOE-ε2 allele on diseases in the elderly and survival remains elusive. METHODS: We aggregated data of 38,537 individuals of European ancestry (mean age 65.5 years; 55.6% women) from six population-based cohort studies (Rotterdam Study, AGES-Reykjavik Study, Cardiovascular Health Study, Health-ABC Study, and the family-based Framingham Heart Study and Long Life Family Study) to determine the association of APOE, and in particular APOE-ε2, with survival in the population. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 11.7 years, 17,021 individuals died. Compared with homozygous APOE-ε3 carriers, APOE-ε2 carriers were at lower risk of death (hazard ratio,95% confidence interval: 0.94,0.90–0.99; P = 1.1*10(−2)), whereas APOE-ε4 carriers were at increased risk of death (HR 1.17,1.12–1.21; P = 2.8*10(−16)). APOE was associated with mortality risk in a dose-dependent manner, with risk estimates lowest for homozygous APOE-ε2 (HR 0.89,0.74–1.08), and highest for homozygous APOE-ε4 (HR 1.52,1.37–1.70). After censoring for dementia, effect estimates remained similar for APOE-ε2 (HR 0.95,0.90–1.01), but attenuated for APOE-ε4 (HR 1.07,1.01–1.12). Results were broadly similar across cohorts, and did not differ by age or sex. APOE genotype was associated with baseline lipid fractions (e.g. mean difference(95%CI) in LDL(mg/dL) for ε2 versus ε33: -17.1(-18.1–16.0), and ε4 versus ε33: +5.7(4.8;6.5)), but the association between APOE and mortality was unaltered after adjustment for baseline LDL or cardiovascular disease. Given the European ancestry of the study population, results may not apply to other ethnicities. CONCLUSION: Compared with APOE-ε3, APOE-ε2 is associated with prolonged survival, whereas mortality risk is increased for APOE-ε4 carriers. Further collaborative efforts are needed to unravel the role of APOE and in particular APOE-ε2 in health and disease. Public Library of Science 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6663005/ /pubmed/31356640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219668 Text en © 2019 Wolters et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wolters, Frank J.
Yang, Qiong
Biggs, Mary L.
Jakobsdottir, Johanna
Li, Shuo
Evans, Daniel S.
Bis, Joshua C.
Harris, Tamara B.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Zilhao, Nuno R.
Ghanbari, Mohsen
Ikram, M. Arfan
Launer, Lenore
Psaty, Bruce M.
Tranah, Gregory J.
Kulminski, Alexander M.
Gudnason, Vilmundur
Seshadri, Sudha
The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title_full The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title_fullStr The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title_full_unstemmed The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title_short The impact of APOE genotype on survival: Results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (E2-CHARGE)
title_sort impact of apoe genotype on survival: results of 38,537 participants from six population-based cohorts (e2-charge)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219668
work_keys_str_mv AT woltersfrankj theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT yangqiong theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT biggsmaryl theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT jakobsdottirjohanna theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT lishuo theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT evansdaniels theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT bisjoshuac theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT harristamarab theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT vasanramachandrans theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT zilhaonunor theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT ghanbarimohsen theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT ikrammarfan theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT launerlenore theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT psatybrucem theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT tranahgregoryj theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT kulminskialexanderm theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT gudnasonvilmundur theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT seshadrisudha theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT theimpactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT woltersfrankj impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT yangqiong impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT biggsmaryl impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT jakobsdottirjohanna impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT lishuo impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT evansdaniels impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT bisjoshuac impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT harristamarab impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT vasanramachandrans impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT zilhaonunor impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT ghanbarimohsen impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT ikrammarfan impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT launerlenore impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT psatybrucem impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT tranahgregoryj impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT kulminskialexanderm impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT gudnasonvilmundur impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT seshadrisudha impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge
AT impactofapoegenotypeonsurvivalresultsof38537participantsfromsixpopulationbasedcohortse2charge