Cargando…

Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing

Conventional methods to discern adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector transduction patterns are based on high, stable expression of a reporter gene. As a consequence, conventionally described tropisms omit cell types that undergo transient transduction, or have low but undetectable levels of reporter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Jonathan F., Toulmin, Sushila A., Brida, Kasey L., Eisenlohr, Laurence C., Davidson, Beverly L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11321-7
_version_ 1783440050921406464
author Lang, Jonathan F.
Toulmin, Sushila A.
Brida, Kasey L.
Eisenlohr, Laurence C.
Davidson, Beverly L.
author_facet Lang, Jonathan F.
Toulmin, Sushila A.
Brida, Kasey L.
Eisenlohr, Laurence C.
Davidson, Beverly L.
author_sort Lang, Jonathan F.
collection PubMed
description Conventional methods to discern adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector transduction patterns are based on high, stable expression of a reporter gene. As a consequence, conventionally described tropisms omit cell types that undergo transient transduction, or have low but undetectable levels of reporter expression. This creates a blind spot for AAV-based genome editing applications because only minimal transgene expression is required for activity. Here, we use editing-reporter mice to fill this void. Our approach sensitively captures both high and low transgene expression from AAV vectors. Using AAV8 and other serotypes, we demonstrate the superiority of the approach in a side-by-side comparison with traditional methods, demonstrate numerous, previously unknown sites of AAV targeting, and better predict the gene editing footprint after AAV-CRISPR delivery. We anticipate that this system, which captures the full spectrum of transduction patterns from AAV vectors in vivo, will be foundational to current and emerging AAV technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6667494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66674942019-08-01 Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing Lang, Jonathan F. Toulmin, Sushila A. Brida, Kasey L. Eisenlohr, Laurence C. Davidson, Beverly L. Nat Commun Article Conventional methods to discern adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector transduction patterns are based on high, stable expression of a reporter gene. As a consequence, conventionally described tropisms omit cell types that undergo transient transduction, or have low but undetectable levels of reporter expression. This creates a blind spot for AAV-based genome editing applications because only minimal transgene expression is required for activity. Here, we use editing-reporter mice to fill this void. Our approach sensitively captures both high and low transgene expression from AAV vectors. Using AAV8 and other serotypes, we demonstrate the superiority of the approach in a side-by-side comparison with traditional methods, demonstrate numerous, previously unknown sites of AAV targeting, and better predict the gene editing footprint after AAV-CRISPR delivery. We anticipate that this system, which captures the full spectrum of transduction patterns from AAV vectors in vivo, will be foundational to current and emerging AAV technologies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6667494/ /pubmed/31363095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11321-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lang, Jonathan F.
Toulmin, Sushila A.
Brida, Kasey L.
Eisenlohr, Laurence C.
Davidson, Beverly L.
Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title_full Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title_fullStr Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title_full_unstemmed Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title_short Standard screening methods underreport AAV-mediated transduction and gene editing
title_sort standard screening methods underreport aav-mediated transduction and gene editing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11321-7
work_keys_str_mv AT langjonathanf standardscreeningmethodsunderreportaavmediatedtransductionandgeneediting
AT toulminsushilaa standardscreeningmethodsunderreportaavmediatedtransductionandgeneediting
AT bridakaseyl standardscreeningmethodsunderreportaavmediatedtransductionandgeneediting
AT eisenlohrlaurencec standardscreeningmethodsunderreportaavmediatedtransductionandgeneediting
AT davidsonbeverlyl standardscreeningmethodsunderreportaavmediatedtransductionandgeneediting