Cargando…

Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG

The preservation of the viability of microorganisms in probiotic formulations is the most important parameter ensuring the adequate concentration of live microorganisms at the time of administration. The formulation and processing techniques used to produce these probiotic formulations can influence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiekens, Shari, Vandenheuvel, Dieter, Broeckx, Géraldine, Claes, Ingmar, Allonsius, Camille, De Boeck, Ilke, Thys, Sofie, Timmermans, Jean‐Pierre, Kiekens, Filip, Lebeer, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13426
_version_ 1783441539490381824
author Kiekens, Shari
Vandenheuvel, Dieter
Broeckx, Géraldine
Claes, Ingmar
Allonsius, Camille
De Boeck, Ilke
Thys, Sofie
Timmermans, Jean‐Pierre
Kiekens, Filip
Lebeer, Sarah
author_facet Kiekens, Shari
Vandenheuvel, Dieter
Broeckx, Géraldine
Claes, Ingmar
Allonsius, Camille
De Boeck, Ilke
Thys, Sofie
Timmermans, Jean‐Pierre
Kiekens, Filip
Lebeer, Sarah
author_sort Kiekens, Shari
collection PubMed
description The preservation of the viability of microorganisms in probiotic formulations is the most important parameter ensuring the adequate concentration of live microorganisms at the time of administration. The formulation and processing techniques used to produce these probiotic formulations can influence the preservation of the microbial viability. However, it is also required that the bacteria maintain their key probiotic capacities during processing, formulation and shelf life. In this study, we investigated the impact of spray‐drying on different cell wall properties of the model probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, including its adherence to intestinal epithelial cells. The dltD gene knock‐out mutant, L. rhamnosus GG CMPG5540, displaying modified cell wall lipoteichoic acids, showed significantly increased colony‐forming units after spray‐drying and subsequent storage under standard conditions compared to wild‐type L. rhamnosus GG. In contrast, disruption of the biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides or pili expression did not impact survival. However, spray‐drying did significantly affect the adherence capacity of L. rhamnosus GG. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the pili, key surface factors for adherence to intestinal cells and mucus, were sheared off during the spray‐drying process. These data thus highlight that both the functionality and viability of probiotics should be assessed during the spray‐drying process and subsequent storage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6680608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66806082019-08-12 Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Kiekens, Shari Vandenheuvel, Dieter Broeckx, Géraldine Claes, Ingmar Allonsius, Camille De Boeck, Ilke Thys, Sofie Timmermans, Jean‐Pierre Kiekens, Filip Lebeer, Sarah Microb Biotechnol Research Articles The preservation of the viability of microorganisms in probiotic formulations is the most important parameter ensuring the adequate concentration of live microorganisms at the time of administration. The formulation and processing techniques used to produce these probiotic formulations can influence the preservation of the microbial viability. However, it is also required that the bacteria maintain their key probiotic capacities during processing, formulation and shelf life. In this study, we investigated the impact of spray‐drying on different cell wall properties of the model probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, including its adherence to intestinal epithelial cells. The dltD gene knock‐out mutant, L. rhamnosus GG CMPG5540, displaying modified cell wall lipoteichoic acids, showed significantly increased colony‐forming units after spray‐drying and subsequent storage under standard conditions compared to wild‐type L. rhamnosus GG. In contrast, disruption of the biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides or pili expression did not impact survival. However, spray‐drying did significantly affect the adherence capacity of L. rhamnosus GG. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that the pili, key surface factors for adherence to intestinal cells and mucus, were sheared off during the spray‐drying process. These data thus highlight that both the functionality and viability of probiotics should be assessed during the spray‐drying process and subsequent storage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6680608/ /pubmed/31225698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13426 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kiekens, Shari
Vandenheuvel, Dieter
Broeckx, Géraldine
Claes, Ingmar
Allonsius, Camille
De Boeck, Ilke
Thys, Sofie
Timmermans, Jean‐Pierre
Kiekens, Filip
Lebeer, Sarah
Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title_full Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title_fullStr Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title_full_unstemmed Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title_short Impact of spray‐drying on the pili of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
title_sort impact of spray‐drying on the pili of lactobacillus rhamnosus gg
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13426
work_keys_str_mv AT kiekensshari impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT vandenheuveldieter impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT broeckxgeraldine impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT claesingmar impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT allonsiuscamille impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT deboeckilke impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT thyssofie impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT timmermansjeanpierre impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT kiekensfilip impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg
AT lebeersarah impactofspraydryingonthepilioflactobacillusrhamnosusgg