Cargando…

Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical e-learning (PGMeL) is being progressively used and evaluated. Its impact continues to grow, yet there are barriers to its implementation. Although more attention is now being paid to quality evaluation models, little has been written about the successful implementati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus, Logger, Daniel Nathan, Westerman, Michiel, Bretschneider, Jochen, Plomp, Marijn, Scheele, Fedde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x
_version_ 1783442084908236800
author de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus
Logger, Daniel Nathan
Westerman, Michiel
Bretschneider, Jochen
Plomp, Marijn
Scheele, Fedde
author_facet de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus
Logger, Daniel Nathan
Westerman, Michiel
Bretschneider, Jochen
Plomp, Marijn
Scheele, Fedde
author_sort de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical e-learning (PGMeL) is being progressively used and evaluated. Its impact continues to grow, yet there are barriers to its implementation. Although more attention is now being paid to quality evaluation models, little has been written about the successful implementation of PGMeL. This study aims to determine factors and define themes influencing the successful implementation of PGMeL. METHODS: We performed 10 semi-structured interviews with experienced e-learning creators, after which we carried out a thematic analysis to name and describe factors and themes. RESULTS: Although this was not the objective of the study, the participants stressed the importance of a definition of success. Associated with this definition were: reaching your target audience, achieving learning aims, satisfying your audience and maintaining continuity. Three themes were identified containing eleven factors that influence successful implementation. The themes were named and defined after the group that had the most influence on the factors. We named them creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors. The creator dependent factors are: the learning aim, pedagogical strategies, content expertise, evaluation and the creators motivational path. The organization dependent factors are management support, recourse and culture. Finally, the learner dependent factors are technology, motivators/barriers and value. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that implementing PGMeL has creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors which should be taken into account during the creating of the PGMeL. Although creator- and learner-dependent factors are mentioned in other studies, the present study also stresses the importance of organization-dependent factors. Innovation implementation theories such as Rogers’ diffusion of innovation or Kotter’s eight steps of change management show a great overlap with these factors. Future studies can both evaluate the use of these innovation models in creating PGMeL and assess the effect of the organizational factors in greater depth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66834022019-08-09 Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus Logger, Daniel Nathan Westerman, Michiel Bretschneider, Jochen Plomp, Marijn Scheele, Fedde BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical e-learning (PGMeL) is being progressively used and evaluated. Its impact continues to grow, yet there are barriers to its implementation. Although more attention is now being paid to quality evaluation models, little has been written about the successful implementation of PGMeL. This study aims to determine factors and define themes influencing the successful implementation of PGMeL. METHODS: We performed 10 semi-structured interviews with experienced e-learning creators, after which we carried out a thematic analysis to name and describe factors and themes. RESULTS: Although this was not the objective of the study, the participants stressed the importance of a definition of success. Associated with this definition were: reaching your target audience, achieving learning aims, satisfying your audience and maintaining continuity. Three themes were identified containing eleven factors that influence successful implementation. The themes were named and defined after the group that had the most influence on the factors. We named them creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors. The creator dependent factors are: the learning aim, pedagogical strategies, content expertise, evaluation and the creators motivational path. The organization dependent factors are management support, recourse and culture. Finally, the learner dependent factors are technology, motivators/barriers and value. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that implementing PGMeL has creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors which should be taken into account during the creating of the PGMeL. Although creator- and learner-dependent factors are mentioned in other studies, the present study also stresses the importance of organization-dependent factors. Innovation implementation theories such as Rogers’ diffusion of innovation or Kotter’s eight steps of change management show a great overlap with these factors. Future studies can both evaluate the use of these innovation models in creating PGMeL and assess the effect of the organizational factors in greater depth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683402/ /pubmed/31382953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Leeuw, Robert Adrianus
Logger, Daniel Nathan
Westerman, Michiel
Bretschneider, Jochen
Plomp, Marijn
Scheele, Fedde
Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title_full Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title_fullStr Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title_short Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
title_sort influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x
work_keys_str_mv AT deleeuwrobertadrianus influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis
AT loggerdanielnathan influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis
AT westermanmichiel influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis
AT bretschneiderjochen influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis
AT plompmarijn influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis
AT scheelefedde influencingfactorsintheimplementationofpostgraduatemedicalelearningathematicanalysis