Cargando…

Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic

Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Abdulaziz, El-Haj, Mahmoud, Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01
_version_ 1783442416783589376
author Malik, Abdulaziz
El-Haj, Mahmoud
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
author_facet Malik, Abdulaziz
El-Haj, Mahmoud
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
author_sort Malik, Abdulaziz
collection PubMed
description Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected from the Medline Plus portal. Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid in English and the Open Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives, a new Arabic readability test. We also examined Arabic documents for other linguistic features that could lead to confusion. Mean readability grades were 6.1 and 7.1 for Arabic and English, respectively (p < .01). In 31.6% of PEMs, the English text was higher by two or more grades than the Arabic text, and the Arabic text was higher by two or more grades than the English text in 3.8% of PEMs. No diacritical marks in Arabic were used. An array of esoteric Arabic medical terms, transliterated English terms, Arabicized English terms, and written versions of spoken Arabic dialects were used. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(3):e170–e173.]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66855152019-08-13 Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic Malik, Abdulaziz El-Haj, Mahmoud Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. Health Lit Res Pract Brief Report Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected from the Medline Plus portal. Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid in English and the Open Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives, a new Arabic readability test. We also examined Arabic documents for other linguistic features that could lead to confusion. Mean readability grades were 6.1 and 7.1 for Arabic and English, respectively (p < .01). In 31.6% of PEMs, the English text was higher by two or more grades than the Arabic text, and the Arabic text was higher by two or more grades than the English text in 3.8% of PEMs. No diacritical marks in Arabic were used. An array of esoteric Arabic medical terms, transliterated English terms, Arabicized English terms, and written versions of spoken Arabic dialects were used. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(3):e170–e173.] SLACK Incorporated 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6685515/ /pubmed/31410388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01 Text en ©2019 Malik, El-Haj, Paasche-Orlow This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Malik, Abdulaziz
El-Haj, Mahmoud
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title_full Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title_fullStr Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title_full_unstemmed Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title_short Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
title_sort readability of patient educational materials in english versus arabic
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01
work_keys_str_mv AT malikabdulaziz readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic
AT elhajmahmoud readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic
AT paascheorlowmichaelk readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic