Cargando…
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic
Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected fr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SLACK Incorporated
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01 |
_version_ | 1783442416783589376 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Abdulaziz El-Haj, Mahmoud Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. |
author_facet | Malik, Abdulaziz El-Haj, Mahmoud Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. |
author_sort | Malik, Abdulaziz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected from the Medline Plus portal. Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid in English and the Open Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives, a new Arabic readability test. We also examined Arabic documents for other linguistic features that could lead to confusion. Mean readability grades were 6.1 and 7.1 for Arabic and English, respectively (p < .01). In 31.6% of PEMs, the English text was higher by two or more grades than the Arabic text, and the Arabic text was higher by two or more grades than the English text in 3.8% of PEMs. No diacritical marks in Arabic were used. An array of esoteric Arabic medical terms, transliterated English terms, Arabicized English terms, and written versions of spoken Arabic dialects were used. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(3):e170–e173.] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6685515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SLACK Incorporated |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66855152019-08-13 Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic Malik, Abdulaziz El-Haj, Mahmoud Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. Health Lit Res Pract Brief Report Little research has been done about patient educational materials (PEMs) written in Arabic. Readability of Arabic PEMs has not previously been assessed because, until recently, there was no validated Arabic readability assessment tool. A total of 207 PEMs in both Arabic and English were collected from the Medline Plus portal. Readability was assessed using Flesch-Kincaid in English and the Open Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives, a new Arabic readability test. We also examined Arabic documents for other linguistic features that could lead to confusion. Mean readability grades were 6.1 and 7.1 for Arabic and English, respectively (p < .01). In 31.6% of PEMs, the English text was higher by two or more grades than the Arabic text, and the Arabic text was higher by two or more grades than the English text in 3.8% of PEMs. No diacritical marks in Arabic were used. An array of esoteric Arabic medical terms, transliterated English terms, Arabicized English terms, and written versions of spoken Arabic dialects were used. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(3):e170–e173.] SLACK Incorporated 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6685515/ /pubmed/31410388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01 Text en ©2019 Malik, El-Haj, Paasche-Orlow This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Malik, Abdulaziz El-Haj, Mahmoud Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title | Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title_full | Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title_fullStr | Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title_full_unstemmed | Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title_short | Readability of Patient Educational Materials in English Versus Arabic |
title_sort | readability of patient educational materials in english versus arabic |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190528-01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikabdulaziz readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic AT elhajmahmoud readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic AT paascheorlowmichaelk readabilityofpatienteducationalmaterialsinenglishversusarabic |