Cargando…
Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study
The purpose of this study is to clarify whether there is a learning effect on brain activity after writing with an ink pen vs. a digital pen. Previous studies have reported the superiority of handwriting to typing in terms of learning performance, but differences between the use of an ink pen vs. a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00275 |
_version_ | 1783444366326497280 |
---|---|
author | Osugi, Kiyoyuki Ihara, Aya S. Nakajima, Kae Kake, Akiyuki Ishimaru, Kizuku Yokota, Yusuke Naruse, Yasushi |
author_facet | Osugi, Kiyoyuki Ihara, Aya S. Nakajima, Kae Kake, Akiyuki Ishimaru, Kizuku Yokota, Yusuke Naruse, Yasushi |
author_sort | Osugi, Kiyoyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study is to clarify whether there is a learning effect on brain activity after writing with an ink pen vs. a digital pen. Previous studies have reported the superiority of handwriting to typing in terms of learning performance, but differences between the use of an ink pen vs. a digital pen remain unclear. In the present study, the participants learned to read difficult words by writing with an ink pen vs. a digital pen. After the learning period, electroencephalography (EEG) signals were measured, while the participants underwent a repetition priming paradigm with the use of the learned words. The repetition priming effect of the N400 event-related potential (ERP) was quantified as an index of the learning effect and the effects between pen types were compared. The groups were also subdivided according to whether a digital pen is frequently used (familiar vs. unfamiliar group). The number of writing repetitions for each word within 10 min during the learning activity and the post-learning test scores were not affected by the pen-type or familiarity with a digital pen. However, the repetition priming effect of the N400 was greater for words written with a digital pen in the learning session, as compared with an ink pen, in the familiar group, but not the unfamiliar group. These results suggest that for those familiar with its use, writing with a digital pen may improve learning relative to the use of an ink pen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6697244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66972442019-08-23 Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study Osugi, Kiyoyuki Ihara, Aya S. Nakajima, Kae Kake, Akiyuki Ishimaru, Kizuku Yokota, Yusuke Naruse, Yasushi Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The purpose of this study is to clarify whether there is a learning effect on brain activity after writing with an ink pen vs. a digital pen. Previous studies have reported the superiority of handwriting to typing in terms of learning performance, but differences between the use of an ink pen vs. a digital pen remain unclear. In the present study, the participants learned to read difficult words by writing with an ink pen vs. a digital pen. After the learning period, electroencephalography (EEG) signals were measured, while the participants underwent a repetition priming paradigm with the use of the learned words. The repetition priming effect of the N400 event-related potential (ERP) was quantified as an index of the learning effect and the effects between pen types were compared. The groups were also subdivided according to whether a digital pen is frequently used (familiar vs. unfamiliar group). The number of writing repetitions for each word within 10 min during the learning activity and the post-learning test scores were not affected by the pen-type or familiarity with a digital pen. However, the repetition priming effect of the N400 was greater for words written with a digital pen in the learning session, as compared with an ink pen, in the familiar group, but not the unfamiliar group. These results suggest that for those familiar with its use, writing with a digital pen may improve learning relative to the use of an ink pen. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6697244/ /pubmed/31447662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00275 Text en Copyright © 2019 Osugi, Ihara, Nakajima, Kake, Ishimaru, Yokota and Naruse. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Osugi, Kiyoyuki Ihara, Aya S. Nakajima, Kae Kake, Akiyuki Ishimaru, Kizuku Yokota, Yusuke Naruse, Yasushi Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title | Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title_full | Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title_fullStr | Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title_short | Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen—An Electroencephalography Study |
title_sort | differences in brain activity after learning with the use of a digital pen vs. an ink pen—an electroencephalography study |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osugikiyoyuki differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT iharaayas differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT nakajimakae differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT kakeakiyuki differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT ishimarukizuku differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT yokotayusuke differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy AT naruseyasushi differencesinbrainactivityafterlearningwiththeuseofadigitalpenvsaninkpenanelectroencephalographystudy |