Cargando…

A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice

BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khezri, Jafar, Heidari, Farid, Shamsara, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457022
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632
_version_ 1783444437203943424
author Khezri, Jafar
Heidari, Farid
Shamsara, Mahdi
author_facet Khezri, Jafar
Heidari, Farid
Shamsara, Mahdi
author_sort Khezri, Jafar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity, and morula fusion are the two main techniques in producing transgenic mice. So far, no reports have dealt with the comparison of these two methodologies provide. OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to determine advantages and disadvantages of knockout mouse creation protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both blastocyst microinjection and morula aggregation were implemented to produce chimeric mice and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique were evaluated. For this, embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP-expression vector. In blastocyst microinjection technique, first transfected ES cell were cultured and appropriate colonies were selected. The cells were microinjected to blastocoel cavity of the expanded blastocyst. In morula aggregation technique, the transfected ES cell colonies were sandwiched between two naked morulas. After 16 h incubation in a 5% CO(2) at 37 °C the morulas and infected ES cell were aggregated to produce a new morula. All the injected blastocyst and aggregated morulas were transferred to uterus of foster mice. The new born mice were analyzed for chimera confirmation. RESULTS: Five chimeric mice (21.75%) from morula aggregation and eight chimeric mice (63%) from blastocyst microinjection were born. The results indicated that both techniques can be used to generate chimeric mouse, however the success rate was higher in blastocyst microinjection. CONCLUSION: Morula fusion stands out where the required instrumentations are in place. Furthermore, the quality of ES cells plays a prominent role in the success rate. When the cell quality is low the blastocoel microinjection is recommended. The microinjection technique is more effective than morula aggregation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6697828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66978282019-08-27 A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice Khezri, Jafar Heidari, Farid Shamsara, Mahdi Iran J Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity, and morula fusion are the two main techniques in producing transgenic mice. So far, no reports have dealt with the comparison of these two methodologies provide. OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to determine advantages and disadvantages of knockout mouse creation protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both blastocyst microinjection and morula aggregation were implemented to produce chimeric mice and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique were evaluated. For this, embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP-expression vector. In blastocyst microinjection technique, first transfected ES cell were cultured and appropriate colonies were selected. The cells were microinjected to blastocoel cavity of the expanded blastocyst. In morula aggregation technique, the transfected ES cell colonies were sandwiched between two naked morulas. After 16 h incubation in a 5% CO(2) at 37 °C the morulas and infected ES cell were aggregated to produce a new morula. All the injected blastocyst and aggregated morulas were transferred to uterus of foster mice. The new born mice were analyzed for chimera confirmation. RESULTS: Five chimeric mice (21.75%) from morula aggregation and eight chimeric mice (63%) from blastocyst microinjection were born. The results indicated that both techniques can be used to generate chimeric mouse, however the success rate was higher in blastocyst microinjection. CONCLUSION: Morula fusion stands out where the required instrumentations are in place. Furthermore, the quality of ES cells plays a prominent role in the success rate. When the cell quality is low the blastocoel microinjection is recommended. The microinjection technique is more effective than morula aggregation. National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2018-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6697828/ /pubmed/31457022 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s); Published by National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits others to copy and redistribute material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khezri, Jafar
Heidari, Farid
Shamsara, Mahdi
A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title_full A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title_fullStr A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title_short A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
title_sort study on merits and demerits of two main gene silencing techniques in mice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457022
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632
work_keys_str_mv AT khezrijafar astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice
AT heidarifarid astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice
AT shamsaramahdi astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice
AT khezrijafar studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice
AT heidarifarid studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice
AT shamsaramahdi studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice