Cargando…
A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice
BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457022 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632 |
_version_ | 1783444437203943424 |
---|---|
author | Khezri, Jafar Heidari, Farid Shamsara, Mahdi |
author_facet | Khezri, Jafar Heidari, Farid Shamsara, Mahdi |
author_sort | Khezri, Jafar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity, and morula fusion are the two main techniques in producing transgenic mice. So far, no reports have dealt with the comparison of these two methodologies provide. OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to determine advantages and disadvantages of knockout mouse creation protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both blastocyst microinjection and morula aggregation were implemented to produce chimeric mice and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique were evaluated. For this, embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP-expression vector. In blastocyst microinjection technique, first transfected ES cell were cultured and appropriate colonies were selected. The cells were microinjected to blastocoel cavity of the expanded blastocyst. In morula aggregation technique, the transfected ES cell colonies were sandwiched between two naked morulas. After 16 h incubation in a 5% CO(2) at 37 °C the morulas and infected ES cell were aggregated to produce a new morula. All the injected blastocyst and aggregated morulas were transferred to uterus of foster mice. The new born mice were analyzed for chimera confirmation. RESULTS: Five chimeric mice (21.75%) from morula aggregation and eight chimeric mice (63%) from blastocyst microinjection were born. The results indicated that both techniques can be used to generate chimeric mouse, however the success rate was higher in blastocyst microinjection. CONCLUSION: Morula fusion stands out where the required instrumentations are in place. Furthermore, the quality of ES cells plays a prominent role in the success rate. When the cell quality is low the blastocoel microinjection is recommended. The microinjection technique is more effective than morula aggregation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6697828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66978282019-08-27 A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice Khezri, Jafar Heidari, Farid Shamsara, Mahdi Iran J Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Transgenic mice are being considered as invaluable tool in biological sciences towards comprehension of the cause of the genetic diseases. Manipulated embryonic stem (ES) cells are used to produce loss-of-function mutant mice. Microinjection of manipulated ES cells into blastocoel cavity, and morula fusion are the two main techniques in producing transgenic mice. So far, no reports have dealt with the comparison of these two methodologies provide. OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to determine advantages and disadvantages of knockout mouse creation protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both blastocyst microinjection and morula aggregation were implemented to produce chimeric mice and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique were evaluated. For this, embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP-expression vector. In blastocyst microinjection technique, first transfected ES cell were cultured and appropriate colonies were selected. The cells were microinjected to blastocoel cavity of the expanded blastocyst. In morula aggregation technique, the transfected ES cell colonies were sandwiched between two naked morulas. After 16 h incubation in a 5% CO(2) at 37 °C the morulas and infected ES cell were aggregated to produce a new morula. All the injected blastocyst and aggregated morulas were transferred to uterus of foster mice. The new born mice were analyzed for chimera confirmation. RESULTS: Five chimeric mice (21.75%) from morula aggregation and eight chimeric mice (63%) from blastocyst microinjection were born. The results indicated that both techniques can be used to generate chimeric mouse, however the success rate was higher in blastocyst microinjection. CONCLUSION: Morula fusion stands out where the required instrumentations are in place. Furthermore, the quality of ES cells plays a prominent role in the success rate. When the cell quality is low the blastocoel microinjection is recommended. The microinjection technique is more effective than morula aggregation. National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2018-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6697828/ /pubmed/31457022 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s); Published by National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits others to copy and redistribute material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khezri, Jafar Heidari, Farid Shamsara, Mahdi A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title | A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title_full | A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title_fullStr | A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title_full_unstemmed | A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title_short | A Study on Merits and Demerits of Two Main Gene Silencing Techniques in Mice |
title_sort | study on merits and demerits of two main gene silencing techniques in mice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457022 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijb.1632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khezrijafar astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice AT heidarifarid astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice AT shamsaramahdi astudyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice AT khezrijafar studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice AT heidarifarid studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice AT shamsaramahdi studyonmeritsanddemeritsoftwomaingenesilencingtechniquesinmice |