Cargando…
Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade
The use of Augmented Reality (AR) to achieve educational inclusion has been not deeply explored. This systematic review describes the current state of using AR as an educational technology that takes into consideration the needs of all students including those with a disability. It is done through t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835 |
_version_ | 1783444821802745856 |
---|---|
author | Quintero, Jairo Baldiris, Silvia Rubira, Rainer Cerón, Jhoni Velez, Gloria |
author_facet | Quintero, Jairo Baldiris, Silvia Rubira, Rainer Cerón, Jhoni Velez, Gloria |
author_sort | Quintero, Jairo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of Augmented Reality (AR) to achieve educational inclusion has been not deeply explored. This systematic review describes the current state of using AR as an educational technology that takes into consideration the needs of all students including those with a disability. It is done through the analysis of factors, such as the advantages of AR, its limitations, uses, challenges, its scope in the educational field, the attended population and the positive or negative effects of its use in learning scenarios that involve students with diverse educational needs. A total of 50 studies between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed through searching in three interdisciplinary databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and Springer link. For this, the methodological stages considered were planning the review, search, analysis of literature and results report. After analyzing the results, it was possible to demonstrate that the use of AR for inclusive education in the field of sciences is where more studies have been conducted. In regard to the population with disabilities, among the most representative advantages reported were the motivation, interaction and generating interest on the part of the student. At the same time, an important methodological limitation identified was the size of the sample; some investigations were done with two or three subjects, some studies Single Subject Designs were found. In terms of the population attended, the studies generally included students with different impairments (hearing, visual, motor or cognitive), minorities (ethnic, vulnerable), leaving aside other groups excluded as exceptional talents and immigrants, which could be explored in the future. Despite different problems to be addressed, few frameworks to the diversity attention in education were reported, and there was no model and methodology in inclusive education considered in the studies. Finally, from this review we have identified open issues that could give rise to new research in the subject of using AR to favor the creation of inclusive learning scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67002082019-08-27 Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade Quintero, Jairo Baldiris, Silvia Rubira, Rainer Cerón, Jhoni Velez, Gloria Front Psychol Psychology The use of Augmented Reality (AR) to achieve educational inclusion has been not deeply explored. This systematic review describes the current state of using AR as an educational technology that takes into consideration the needs of all students including those with a disability. It is done through the analysis of factors, such as the advantages of AR, its limitations, uses, challenges, its scope in the educational field, the attended population and the positive or negative effects of its use in learning scenarios that involve students with diverse educational needs. A total of 50 studies between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed through searching in three interdisciplinary databases: Scopus, Web of Science, and Springer link. For this, the methodological stages considered were planning the review, search, analysis of literature and results report. After analyzing the results, it was possible to demonstrate that the use of AR for inclusive education in the field of sciences is where more studies have been conducted. In regard to the population with disabilities, among the most representative advantages reported were the motivation, interaction and generating interest on the part of the student. At the same time, an important methodological limitation identified was the size of the sample; some investigations were done with two or three subjects, some studies Single Subject Designs were found. In terms of the population attended, the studies generally included students with different impairments (hearing, visual, motor or cognitive), minorities (ethnic, vulnerable), leaving aside other groups excluded as exceptional talents and immigrants, which could be explored in the future. Despite different problems to be addressed, few frameworks to the diversity attention in education were reported, and there was no model and methodology in inclusive education considered in the studies. Finally, from this review we have identified open issues that could give rise to new research in the subject of using AR to favor the creation of inclusive learning scenarios. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6700208/ /pubmed/31456716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835 Text en Copyright © 2019 Quintero, Baldiris, Rubira, Cerón and Velez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Quintero, Jairo Baldiris, Silvia Rubira, Rainer Cerón, Jhoni Velez, Gloria Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title | Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title_full | Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title_fullStr | Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title_full_unstemmed | Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title_short | Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade |
title_sort | augmented reality in educational inclusion. a systematic review on the last decade |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinterojairo augmentedrealityineducationalinclusionasystematicreviewonthelastdecade AT baldirissilvia augmentedrealityineducationalinclusionasystematicreviewonthelastdecade AT rubirarainer augmentedrealityineducationalinclusionasystematicreviewonthelastdecade AT ceronjhoni augmentedrealityineducationalinclusionasystematicreviewonthelastdecade AT velezgloria augmentedrealityineducationalinclusionasystematicreviewonthelastdecade |