Cargando…
A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction
BACKGROUND: Protein pulldown using Methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins followed by high-throughput sequencing is a common method to determine DNA methylation. Algorithms have been developed to estimate absolute methylation level from read coverage generated by affinity enrichment-based techniqu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3011-2 |
_version_ | 1783444928980844544 |
---|---|
author | Moreland, Blythe S. Oman, Kenji M. Bundschuh, Ralf |
author_facet | Moreland, Blythe S. Oman, Kenji M. Bundschuh, Ralf |
author_sort | Moreland, Blythe S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Protein pulldown using Methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins followed by high-throughput sequencing is a common method to determine DNA methylation. Algorithms have been developed to estimate absolute methylation level from read coverage generated by affinity enrichment-based techniques, but the most accurate one for MBD-seq data requires additional data from an SssI-treated Control experiment. RESULTS: Using our previous characterizations of Methyl-CpG/MBD2 binding in the context of an MBD pulldown experiment, we build a model of expected MBD pulldown reads as drawn from SssI-treated DNA. We use the program BayMeth to evaluate the effectiveness of this model by substituting calculated SssI Control data for the observed SssI Control data. By comparing methylation predictions against those from an RRBS data set, we find that BayMeth run with our modeled SssI Control data performs better than BayMeth run with observed SssI Control data, on both 100 bp and 10 bp windows. Adapting the model to an external data set solely by changing the average fragment length, our calculated data still informs the BayMeth program to a similar level as observed data in predicting methylation state on a pulldown data set with matching WGBS estimates. CONCLUSION: In both internal and external MBD pulldown data sets tested in this study, BayMeth used with our modeled pulldown coverage performs better than BayMeth run without the inclusion of any estimate of SssI Control pulldown, and is comparable to – and in some cases better than – using observed SssI Control data with the BayMeth program. Thus, our MBD pulldown alignment model can improve methylation predictions without the need to perform additional control experiments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-3011-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67007792019-08-26 A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction Moreland, Blythe S. Oman, Kenji M. Bundschuh, Ralf BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Protein pulldown using Methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins followed by high-throughput sequencing is a common method to determine DNA methylation. Algorithms have been developed to estimate absolute methylation level from read coverage generated by affinity enrichment-based techniques, but the most accurate one for MBD-seq data requires additional data from an SssI-treated Control experiment. RESULTS: Using our previous characterizations of Methyl-CpG/MBD2 binding in the context of an MBD pulldown experiment, we build a model of expected MBD pulldown reads as drawn from SssI-treated DNA. We use the program BayMeth to evaluate the effectiveness of this model by substituting calculated SssI Control data for the observed SssI Control data. By comparing methylation predictions against those from an RRBS data set, we find that BayMeth run with our modeled SssI Control data performs better than BayMeth run with observed SssI Control data, on both 100 bp and 10 bp windows. Adapting the model to an external data set solely by changing the average fragment length, our calculated data still informs the BayMeth program to a similar level as observed data in predicting methylation state on a pulldown data set with matching WGBS estimates. CONCLUSION: In both internal and external MBD pulldown data sets tested in this study, BayMeth used with our modeled pulldown coverage performs better than BayMeth run without the inclusion of any estimate of SssI Control pulldown, and is comparable to – and in some cases better than – using observed SssI Control data with the BayMeth program. Thus, our MBD pulldown alignment model can improve methylation predictions without the need to perform additional control experiments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-3011-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6700779/ /pubmed/31426747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3011-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moreland, Blythe S. Oman, Kenji M. Bundschuh, Ralf A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title | A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title_full | A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title_fullStr | A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title_short | A model of pulldown alignments from SssI-treated DNA improves DNA methylation prediction |
title_sort | model of pulldown alignments from sssi-treated dna improves dna methylation prediction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3011-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morelandblythes amodelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction AT omankenjim amodelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction AT bundschuhralf amodelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction AT morelandblythes modelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction AT omankenjim modelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction AT bundschuhralf modelofpulldownalignmentsfromsssitreateddnaimprovesdnamethylationprediction |