Cargando…
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31438936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4 |
_version_ | 1783445525908946944 |
---|---|
author | Rosman, Samantha L. Nyirasafari, Rosine Bwiza, Hippolyte Muhire Umuhoza, Christian Camp, Elizabeth A. Weiner, Debra L. Rus, Marideth C. |
author_facet | Rosman, Samantha L. Nyirasafari, Rosine Bwiza, Hippolyte Muhire Umuhoza, Christian Camp, Elizabeth A. Weiner, Debra L. Rus, Marideth C. |
author_sort | Rosman, Samantha L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. METHODS: Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6704559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67045592019-08-22 Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting Rosman, Samantha L. Nyirasafari, Rosine Bwiza, Hippolyte Muhire Umuhoza, Christian Camp, Elizabeth A. Weiner, Debra L. Rus, Marideth C. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. METHODS: Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6704559/ /pubmed/31438936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rosman, Samantha L. Nyirasafari, Rosine Bwiza, Hippolyte Muhire Umuhoza, Christian Camp, Elizabeth A. Weiner, Debra L. Rus, Marideth C. Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title | Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_full | Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_fullStr | Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_short | Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_sort | rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6704559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31438936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosmansamanthal rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT nyirasafarirosine rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT bwizahippolytemuhire rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT umuhozachristian rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT campelizabetha rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT weinerdebral rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT rusmaridethc rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting |