Cargando…

Maximizing the acquisition of core communication skills at the start of medical training

BACKGROUND: Clinical communication teaching for medical undergraduates may involve real patient contact alongside simulated patient (SP) contact. However, there is still comparatively little known about the experience of learning with real patients and how that may impact on the SP encounter. AIM: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohiaddin, Hasan, Malik, Anam, Murtagh, Ged M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695549
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S212727
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Clinical communication teaching for medical undergraduates may involve real patient contact alongside simulated patient (SP) contact. However, there is still comparatively little known about the experience of learning with real patients and how that may impact on the SP encounter. AIM: To explore the impact of real patient contact on the experience of communication skills training and SP contact for first-year medical undergraduate students. METHODS: As part of the 6-year MBBS undergraduate medical degree at Imperial College London, students are obliged to undertake communication skills training, which involves teaching with simulated and real patients. In 2017 (toward the end of formal teaching), a small sample of Year 1 medical students, who had taken part in extra-curricular teaching with real patients were recruited for the study to compare their performance with a control group in a SP encounter. The performance of both groups was analyzed alongside follow-up focus group data from a sample of the study group. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed there was no significant difference in communication skills during a scored SP interview between students with real patient contact and those without. Focus group data, however, revealed valuable insights into the experience of learning with real patients. Students reported a marked increase in their confidence and ability to naturalize their communication skills as a result of real patient contact. Students also reported that skills gained through real patient contact may not always transfer easily to the SP setting. CONCLUSION: Real patient contact is an invaluable component of communication training for undergraduate medical students. For successful implementation, there needs to be a clear curricular purpose at pedagogical, practical and organizational levels. Students’ experience of real patient contact can provide an informed foundation upon which to implement other modes of teaching.