Cargando…
Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252 |
_version_ | 1783447990694838272 |
---|---|
author | Fontaine, Guillaume Cossette, Sylvie Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Mailhot, Tanya Deschênes, Marie-France Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle Côté, José Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Veronique |
author_facet | Fontaine, Guillaume Cossette, Sylvie Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Mailhot, Tanya Deschênes, Marie-France Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle Côté, José Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Veronique |
author_sort | Fontaine, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge, skills and clinical behaviour in health professionals and students. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science from the first year of records to February 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the effect of an AEE on knowledge, skills or clinical behaviour in health professionals or students. SCREENING, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded quality of evidence independently. AEEs were reviewed with regard to their topic, theoretical framework and adaptivity process. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had a non-adaptive e-learning environment control group and had no missing data. Effect sizes (ES) were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: From a pool of 10 569 articles, we included 21 eligible studies enrolling 3684 health professionals and students. Clinical topics were mostly related to diagnostic testing, theoretical frameworks were varied and the adaptivity process was characterised by five subdomains: method, goals, timing, factors and types. The pooled ES was 0.70 for knowledge (95% CI −0.08 to 1.49; p.08) and 1.19 for skills (95% CI 0.59 to 1.79; p<0.00001). Risk of bias was generally high. Heterogeneity was large in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AEEs appear particularly effective in improving skills in health professionals and students. The adaptivity process within AEEs may be more beneficial for learning skills rather than factual knowledge, which generates less cognitive load. Future research should report more clearly on the design and adaptivity process of AEEs, and target higher-level outcomes, such as clinical behaviour. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065585 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6719835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67198352019-09-17 Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fontaine, Guillaume Cossette, Sylvie Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Mailhot, Tanya Deschênes, Marie-France Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle Côté, José Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Veronique BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge, skills and clinical behaviour in health professionals and students. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science from the first year of records to February 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the effect of an AEE on knowledge, skills or clinical behaviour in health professionals or students. SCREENING, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded quality of evidence independently. AEEs were reviewed with regard to their topic, theoretical framework and adaptivity process. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had a non-adaptive e-learning environment control group and had no missing data. Effect sizes (ES) were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: From a pool of 10 569 articles, we included 21 eligible studies enrolling 3684 health professionals and students. Clinical topics were mostly related to diagnostic testing, theoretical frameworks were varied and the adaptivity process was characterised by five subdomains: method, goals, timing, factors and types. The pooled ES was 0.70 for knowledge (95% CI −0.08 to 1.49; p.08) and 1.19 for skills (95% CI 0.59 to 1.79; p<0.00001). Risk of bias was generally high. Heterogeneity was large in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AEEs appear particularly effective in improving skills in health professionals and students. The adaptivity process within AEEs may be more beneficial for learning skills rather than factual knowledge, which generates less cognitive load. Future research should report more clearly on the design and adaptivity process of AEEs, and target higher-level outcomes, such as clinical behaviour. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065585 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6719835/ /pubmed/31467045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Fontaine, Guillaume Cossette, Sylvie Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Mailhot, Tanya Deschênes, Marie-France Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle Côté, José Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Veronique Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontaineguillaume efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cossettesylvie efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maheucadottemarcandre efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mailhottanya efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT deschenesmariefrance efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mathieudupuisgabrielle efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cotejose efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gagnonmariepierre efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dubeveronique efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |