Cargando…

Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontaine, Guillaume, Cossette, Sylvie, Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André, Mailhot, Tanya, Deschênes, Marie-France, Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle, Côté, José, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Dubé, Veronique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252
_version_ 1783447990694838272
author Fontaine, Guillaume
Cossette, Sylvie
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Mailhot, Tanya
Deschênes, Marie-France
Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Dubé, Veronique
author_facet Fontaine, Guillaume
Cossette, Sylvie
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Mailhot, Tanya
Deschênes, Marie-France
Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Dubé, Veronique
author_sort Fontaine, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge, skills and clinical behaviour in health professionals and students. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science from the first year of records to February 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the effect of an AEE on knowledge, skills or clinical behaviour in health professionals or students. SCREENING, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded quality of evidence independently. AEEs were reviewed with regard to their topic, theoretical framework and adaptivity process. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had a non-adaptive e-learning environment control group and had no missing data. Effect sizes (ES) were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: From a pool of 10 569 articles, we included 21 eligible studies enrolling 3684 health professionals and students. Clinical topics were mostly related to diagnostic testing, theoretical frameworks were varied and the adaptivity process was characterised by five subdomains: method, goals, timing, factors and types. The pooled ES was 0.70 for knowledge (95% CI −0.08 to 1.49; p.08) and 1.19 for skills (95% CI 0.59 to 1.79; p<0.00001). Risk of bias was generally high. Heterogeneity was large in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AEEs appear particularly effective in improving skills in health professionals and students. The adaptivity process within AEEs may be more beneficial for learning skills rather than factual knowledge, which generates less cognitive load. Future research should report more clearly on the design and adaptivity process of AEEs, and target higher-level outcomes, such as clinical behaviour. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065585
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67198352019-09-17 Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fontaine, Guillaume Cossette, Sylvie Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Mailhot, Tanya Deschênes, Marie-France Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle Côté, José Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Veronique BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVE: Although adaptive e-learning environments (AEEs) can provide personalised instruction to health professional and students, their efficacy remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence regarding the efficacy of AEEs in improving knowledge, skills and clinical behaviour in health professionals and students. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science from the first year of records to February 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the effect of an AEE on knowledge, skills or clinical behaviour in health professionals or students. SCREENING, DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors screened studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and coded quality of evidence independently. AEEs were reviewed with regard to their topic, theoretical framework and adaptivity process. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they had a non-adaptive e-learning environment control group and had no missing data. Effect sizes (ES) were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: From a pool of 10 569 articles, we included 21 eligible studies enrolling 3684 health professionals and students. Clinical topics were mostly related to diagnostic testing, theoretical frameworks were varied and the adaptivity process was characterised by five subdomains: method, goals, timing, factors and types. The pooled ES was 0.70 for knowledge (95% CI −0.08 to 1.49; p.08) and 1.19 for skills (95% CI 0.59 to 1.79; p<0.00001). Risk of bias was generally high. Heterogeneity was large in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AEEs appear particularly effective in improving skills in health professionals and students. The adaptivity process within AEEs may be more beneficial for learning skills rather than factual knowledge, which generates less cognitive load. Future research should report more clearly on the design and adaptivity process of AEEs, and target higher-level outcomes, such as clinical behaviour. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065585 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6719835/ /pubmed/31467045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Fontaine, Guillaume
Cossette, Sylvie
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Mailhot, Tanya
Deschênes, Marie-France
Mathieu-Dupuis, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Dubé, Veronique
Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252
work_keys_str_mv AT fontaineguillaume efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cossettesylvie efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maheucadottemarcandre efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mailhottanya efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deschenesmariefrance efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mathieudupuisgabrielle efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cotejose efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gagnonmariepierre efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dubeveronique efficacyofadaptiveelearningforhealthprofessionalsandstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis