Cargando…

Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess global health (GH) training in all postgraduate medical education in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methodology: scoping review and curricular content analysis using two GH competency frameworks. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A scoping review (until December 2017) was used to develop a frame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Shakarchi, Nader, Obolensky, Lucy, Walpole, Sarah, Hemingway, Harry, Banerjee, Amitava
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027577
_version_ 1783448080481255424
author Al-Shakarchi, Nader
Obolensky, Lucy
Walpole, Sarah
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
author_facet Al-Shakarchi, Nader
Obolensky, Lucy
Walpole, Sarah
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
author_sort Al-Shakarchi, Nader
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess global health (GH) training in all postgraduate medical education in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methodology: scoping review and curricular content analysis using two GH competency frameworks. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A scoping review (until December 2017) was used to develop a framework of GH competencies for doctors. National postgraduate medical training curricula were analysed against this and a prior framework for GH competencies. The number of core competencies addressed and/or appearing in each programme was recorded. OUTCOMES: The scoping review identified eight relevant publications. A 16-competency framework was developed and, with a prior 5-competency framework, used to analyse each of 71 postgraduate medical curricula. Curricula were examined by a team of researchers and relevant learning outcomes were coded as one of the 5 or 16 core competencies. The number of core competencies in each programme was recorded. RESULTS: Using the 5-competency and 16-competency frameworks, 23 and 20, respectively, out of 71 programmes contained no global health competencies, most notably the Foundation Programme (equivalent to internship), a compulsory programme for UK medical graduates. Of a possible 16 competencies, the mean number across all 71 programmes was 1.73 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.04) and the highest number were in paediatrics and infectious diseases, each with five competencies. Of the 16 core competencies, global burden of disease and socioeconomic determinants of health were the two most cited with 47 and 35 citations, respectively. 8/16 competencies were not cited in any curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Equity of care and the challenges of practising in an increasingly globalised world necessitate GH competencies for all doctors. Across the whole of postgraduate training, the majority of UK doctors are receiving minimal or no training in GH. Our GH competency framework can be used to map and plan integration across postgraduate programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6720244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67202442019-09-17 Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis Al-Shakarchi, Nader Obolensky, Lucy Walpole, Sarah Hemingway, Harry Banerjee, Amitava BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: To assess global health (GH) training in all postgraduate medical education in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methodology: scoping review and curricular content analysis using two GH competency frameworks. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A scoping review (until December 2017) was used to develop a framework of GH competencies for doctors. National postgraduate medical training curricula were analysed against this and a prior framework for GH competencies. The number of core competencies addressed and/or appearing in each programme was recorded. OUTCOMES: The scoping review identified eight relevant publications. A 16-competency framework was developed and, with a prior 5-competency framework, used to analyse each of 71 postgraduate medical curricula. Curricula were examined by a team of researchers and relevant learning outcomes were coded as one of the 5 or 16 core competencies. The number of core competencies in each programme was recorded. RESULTS: Using the 5-competency and 16-competency frameworks, 23 and 20, respectively, out of 71 programmes contained no global health competencies, most notably the Foundation Programme (equivalent to internship), a compulsory programme for UK medical graduates. Of a possible 16 competencies, the mean number across all 71 programmes was 1.73 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.04) and the highest number were in paediatrics and infectious diseases, each with five competencies. Of the 16 core competencies, global burden of disease and socioeconomic determinants of health were the two most cited with 47 and 35 citations, respectively. 8/16 competencies were not cited in any curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Equity of care and the challenges of practising in an increasingly globalised world necessitate GH competencies for all doctors. Across the whole of postgraduate training, the majority of UK doctors are receiving minimal or no training in GH. Our GH competency framework can be used to map and plan integration across postgraduate programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6720244/ /pubmed/31446406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027577 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Al-Shakarchi, Nader
Obolensky, Lucy
Walpole, Sarah
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title_full Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title_fullStr Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title_short Global health competencies in UK postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
title_sort global health competencies in uk postgraduate medical training: a scoping review and curricular content analysis
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31446406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027577
work_keys_str_mv AT alshakarchinader globalhealthcompetenciesinukpostgraduatemedicaltrainingascopingreviewandcurricularcontentanalysis
AT obolenskylucy globalhealthcompetenciesinukpostgraduatemedicaltrainingascopingreviewandcurricularcontentanalysis
AT walpolesarah globalhealthcompetenciesinukpostgraduatemedicaltrainingascopingreviewandcurricularcontentanalysis
AT hemingwayharry globalhealthcompetenciesinukpostgraduatemedicaltrainingascopingreviewandcurricularcontentanalysis
AT banerjeeamitava globalhealthcompetenciesinukpostgraduatemedicaltrainingascopingreviewandcurricularcontentanalysis