Cargando…

Determination of Reduced and Oxidized Coenzyme Q(10) in Canine Plasma and Heart Tissue by HPLC-ECD: Comparison with LC-MS/MS Quantification

Coenzyme Q(10) (Q(10)) plays an important role in mammals for energy production in the mitochondria, and as a potent antioxidant. Oxidation ratio (% oxidized in relation to total Q(10)) has been proposed as an important biomarker. A sensitive and reproducible HPLC-ECD method was developed for determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schou-Pedersen, Anne Marie V., Schemeth, Dieter, Lykkesfeldt, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox8080253
Descripción
Sumario:Coenzyme Q(10) (Q(10)) plays an important role in mammals for energy production in the mitochondria, and as a potent antioxidant. Oxidation ratio (% oxidized in relation to total Q(10)) has been proposed as an important biomarker. A sensitive and reproducible HPLC-ECD method was developed for determination of reduced and oxidized Q(10) in canine plasma and heart tissue. Chromatographic separation was achieved in 10 min using a Waters Nova-pak C(18) column and a mobile phase with lithium perchlorate in ethanol/methanol/2-propanol. The validation showed satisfying results. Excellent linear correlation was found (r(2) > 0.9997), intra- and inter-day precisions were below 6.5% (n = 5) and recoveries were between 89 and 109% (n = 5). Sensitivity stated as Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) was 10 nM. Acceptable stability of both extracted and un-extracted samples was observed. The plasma concentration range of total Q(10) was found to be between 0.64 and 1.24 µg/mL. Comparison with a developed LC-MS/MS method showed a correlation of r = 0.85 for reduced Q(10) and r = 0.60 for oxidized Q(10) (N = 17). However, average results were around 30% lower for ubiquinol using the LC-MS/MS method as compared with the HPLC-ECD analysis. The two methods are therefore not considered to be interchangeable.