Cargando…

The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises

The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suchomel, Timothy J., McKeever, Shana M., Sijuwade, Olusegun, Carpenter, Logan, McMahon, John J., Loturco, Irineu, Comfort, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531137
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either the JS, HEXJ, or JShrug at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% of their BM. Relative peak power (PP(Rel)), relative force at PP (F(PP)), and velocity at PP (V(PP)) were compared between exercises and loads. In addition, power-time curves at each load were compared between exercises. Load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP(Rel) were statistically greater than the JS (both p < 0.01), while no difference existed between the HEXJ and the JShrug (p = 1.000). Load-averaged JShrug F(PP) was statistically greater than both the JS and the HEXJ (both p < 0.001), while no statistical difference existed between the JS and the HEXJ (p = 0.111). Load-averaged JS and HEXJ V(PP) were statistically greater than the JShrug (both p < 0.01). In addition, HEXJ V(PP) was statistically greater than the JS (p = 0.009). PP(Rel) was maximized at 40, 40, and 20% BM for the JS, HEXJ, and JShrug, respectively. The JShrug possessed statistically different power-time characteristics compared to both the JS and the HEXJ during the countermovement and propulsion phases. The HEXJ and the JShrug appear to be superior exercises for PP(Rel) compared to the JS. The HEXJ may be considered a more velocity-dominant exercise, while the JShrug may be a more force-dominant one.