Cargando…
The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060 |
_version_ | 1783449021699850240 |
---|---|
author | Suchomel, Timothy J. McKeever, Shana M. Sijuwade, Olusegun Carpenter, Logan McMahon, John J. Loturco, Irineu Comfort, Paul |
author_facet | Suchomel, Timothy J. McKeever, Shana M. Sijuwade, Olusegun Carpenter, Logan McMahon, John J. Loturco, Irineu Comfort, Paul |
author_sort | Suchomel, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either the JS, HEXJ, or JShrug at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% of their BM. Relative peak power (PP(Rel)), relative force at PP (F(PP)), and velocity at PP (V(PP)) were compared between exercises and loads. In addition, power-time curves at each load were compared between exercises. Load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP(Rel) were statistically greater than the JS (both p < 0.01), while no difference existed between the HEXJ and the JShrug (p = 1.000). Load-averaged JShrug F(PP) was statistically greater than both the JS and the HEXJ (both p < 0.001), while no statistical difference existed between the JS and the HEXJ (p = 0.111). Load-averaged JS and HEXJ V(PP) were statistically greater than the JShrug (both p < 0.01). In addition, HEXJ V(PP) was statistically greater than the JS (p = 0.009). PP(Rel) was maximized at 40, 40, and 20% BM for the JS, HEXJ, and JShrug, respectively. The JShrug possessed statistically different power-time characteristics compared to both the JS and the HEXJ during the countermovement and propulsion phases. The HEXJ and the JShrug appear to be superior exercises for PP(Rel) compared to the JS. The HEXJ may be considered a more velocity-dominant exercise, while the JShrug may be a more force-dominant one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6724584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67245842019-09-17 The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises Suchomel, Timothy J. McKeever, Shana M. Sijuwade, Olusegun Carpenter, Logan McMahon, John J. Loturco, Irineu Comfort, Paul J Hum Kinet Strength & Power The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either the JS, HEXJ, or JShrug at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% of their BM. Relative peak power (PP(Rel)), relative force at PP (F(PP)), and velocity at PP (V(PP)) were compared between exercises and loads. In addition, power-time curves at each load were compared between exercises. Load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP(Rel) were statistically greater than the JS (both p < 0.01), while no difference existed between the HEXJ and the JShrug (p = 1.000). Load-averaged JShrug F(PP) was statistically greater than both the JS and the HEXJ (both p < 0.001), while no statistical difference existed between the JS and the HEXJ (p = 0.111). Load-averaged JS and HEXJ V(PP) were statistically greater than the JShrug (both p < 0.01). In addition, HEXJ V(PP) was statistically greater than the JS (p = 0.009). PP(Rel) was maximized at 40, 40, and 20% BM for the JS, HEXJ, and JShrug, respectively. The JShrug possessed statistically different power-time characteristics compared to both the JS and the HEXJ during the countermovement and propulsion phases. The HEXJ and the JShrug appear to be superior exercises for PP(Rel) compared to the JS. The HEXJ may be considered a more velocity-dominant exercise, while the JShrug may be a more force-dominant one. Sciendo 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6724584/ /pubmed/31531137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060 Text en © 2019 Timothy J. Suchomel, Shana M. McKeever, Olusegun Sijuwade, Logan Carpenter, John J. McMahon, Irineu Loturco, Paul Comfort, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Strength & Power Suchomel, Timothy J. McKeever, Shana M. Sijuwade, Olusegun Carpenter, Logan McMahon, John J. Loturco, Irineu Comfort, Paul The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title | The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title_full | The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title_short | The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises |
title_sort | effect of load placement on the power production characteristics of three lower extremity jumping exercises |
topic | Strength & Power |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suchomeltimothyj theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT mckeevershanam theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT sijuwadeolusegun theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT carpenterlogan theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT mcmahonjohnj theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT loturcoirineu theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT comfortpaul theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT suchomeltimothyj effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT mckeevershanam effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT sijuwadeolusegun effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT carpenterlogan effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT mcmahonjohnj effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT loturcoirineu effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises AT comfortpaul effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises |