Cargando…

The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises

The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suchomel, Timothy J., McKeever, Shana M., Sijuwade, Olusegun, Carpenter, Logan, McMahon, John J., Loturco, Irineu, Comfort, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531137
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060
_version_ 1783449021699850240
author Suchomel, Timothy J.
McKeever, Shana M.
Sijuwade, Olusegun
Carpenter, Logan
McMahon, John J.
Loturco, Irineu
Comfort, Paul
author_facet Suchomel, Timothy J.
McKeever, Shana M.
Sijuwade, Olusegun
Carpenter, Logan
McMahon, John J.
Loturco, Irineu
Comfort, Paul
author_sort Suchomel, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either the JS, HEXJ, or JShrug at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% of their BM. Relative peak power (PP(Rel)), relative force at PP (F(PP)), and velocity at PP (V(PP)) were compared between exercises and loads. In addition, power-time curves at each load were compared between exercises. Load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP(Rel) were statistically greater than the JS (both p < 0.01), while no difference existed between the HEXJ and the JShrug (p = 1.000). Load-averaged JShrug F(PP) was statistically greater than both the JS and the HEXJ (both p < 0.001), while no statistical difference existed between the JS and the HEXJ (p = 0.111). Load-averaged JS and HEXJ V(PP) were statistically greater than the JShrug (both p < 0.01). In addition, HEXJ V(PP) was statistically greater than the JS (p = 0.009). PP(Rel) was maximized at 40, 40, and 20% BM for the JS, HEXJ, and JShrug, respectively. The JShrug possessed statistically different power-time characteristics compared to both the JS and the HEXJ during the countermovement and propulsion phases. The HEXJ and the JShrug appear to be superior exercises for PP(Rel) compared to the JS. The HEXJ may be considered a more velocity-dominant exercise, while the JShrug may be a more force-dominant one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6724584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67245842019-09-17 The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises Suchomel, Timothy J. McKeever, Shana M. Sijuwade, Olusegun Carpenter, Logan McMahon, John J. Loturco, Irineu Comfort, Paul J Hum Kinet Strength & Power The purpose of this study was to compare the power production characteristics of the jump squat (JS), hexagonal barbell jump (HEXJ), and jump shrug (JShrug) across a spectrum of relative loads. Fifteen resistance-trained men completed three testing sessions where they performed repetitions of either the JS, HEXJ, or JShrug at body mass (BM) or with 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% of their BM. Relative peak power (PP(Rel)), relative force at PP (F(PP)), and velocity at PP (V(PP)) were compared between exercises and loads. In addition, power-time curves at each load were compared between exercises. Load-averaged HEXJ and JShrug PP(Rel) were statistically greater than the JS (both p < 0.01), while no difference existed between the HEXJ and the JShrug (p = 1.000). Load-averaged JShrug F(PP) was statistically greater than both the JS and the HEXJ (both p < 0.001), while no statistical difference existed between the JS and the HEXJ (p = 0.111). Load-averaged JS and HEXJ V(PP) were statistically greater than the JShrug (both p < 0.01). In addition, HEXJ V(PP) was statistically greater than the JS (p = 0.009). PP(Rel) was maximized at 40, 40, and 20% BM for the JS, HEXJ, and JShrug, respectively. The JShrug possessed statistically different power-time characteristics compared to both the JS and the HEXJ during the countermovement and propulsion phases. The HEXJ and the JShrug appear to be superior exercises for PP(Rel) compared to the JS. The HEXJ may be considered a more velocity-dominant exercise, while the JShrug may be a more force-dominant one. Sciendo 2019-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6724584/ /pubmed/31531137 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060 Text en © 2019 Timothy J. Suchomel, Shana M. McKeever, Olusegun Sijuwade, Logan Carpenter, John J. McMahon, Irineu Loturco, Paul Comfort, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Strength & Power
Suchomel, Timothy J.
McKeever, Shana M.
Sijuwade, Olusegun
Carpenter, Logan
McMahon, John J.
Loturco, Irineu
Comfort, Paul
The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title_full The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title_fullStr The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title_short The Effect of Load Placement on the Power Production Characteristics of Three Lower Extremity Jumping Exercises
title_sort effect of load placement on the power production characteristics of three lower extremity jumping exercises
topic Strength & Power
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31531137
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0060
work_keys_str_mv AT suchomeltimothyj theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT mckeevershanam theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT sijuwadeolusegun theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT carpenterlogan theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT mcmahonjohnj theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT loturcoirineu theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT comfortpaul theeffectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT suchomeltimothyj effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT mckeevershanam effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT sijuwadeolusegun effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT carpenterlogan effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT mcmahonjohnj effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT loturcoirineu effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises
AT comfortpaul effectofloadplacementonthepowerproductioncharacteristicsofthreelowerextremityjumpingexercises