Cargando…

Detection and characterization of estradiol (E2) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) immunoassay interference due to anti-bovine alkaline phosphatase (ALP) antibodies

OBJECTIVES: Competitive immunoenyzmatic assays for estradiol (E2) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) on UniCel DxI 800 Access immunoassay systems (Beckman Coulter) utilize bovine alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for amplification. In these assays, rare ‘IND’ error flags indicate that a relative light unit (RL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maharjan, Anu S., Wyness, Sara P., Ray, Julie A., Willcox, Tanya L., Seiter, Jonathan D., Genzen, Jonathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6745434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31538105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2019.e00131
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Competitive immunoenyzmatic assays for estradiol (E2) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) on UniCel DxI 800 Access immunoassay systems (Beckman Coulter) utilize bovine alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for amplification. In these assays, rare ‘IND’ error flags indicate that a relative light unit (RLU) raw result is past the high or low end of the calibration curve but cannot be differentiated from an instrument error or analytical interference. The present studies were conducted to establish a protocol to identify analytical interference and to characterize its mechanism when present. DESIGN AND METHODS: Matrix and recovery studies were conducted to establish a protocol for interference identification. Spiking experiments with inactivated calf intestinal ALP were performed to determine whether interference could be blocked. Commercial anti-ALP antibodies (Abs) were spiked into human serum to model assay interference. Three E2 immunoassays which do not include ALP as a reagent component (cobas e602, Roche; Centaur XP, Siemens; ARCHITECT i2000(SR), Abbott) were tested for comparative purposes. RESULTS: 1:2 dilution of specimen into Access Sample Diluent A (Beckman) differentiated IND error flags due to true low results (e.g. less than the analytical measurement range; AMR) from those due to assay interference. Interferences were reduced by pre-incubation with inactivated ALP and could be replicated by spiking with commercial anti-ALP Abs. CONCLUSIONS: Patient anti-bovine ALP Abs can cause interference on DxI 800 E2 and uE3 assays. This model can be used to investigate interference risk with other ALP-dependent assays.