Cargando…

Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols

BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jay J. H, Siden, Ellie, Zoratti, Michael J., Dron, Louis, Harari, Ofir, Singer, Joel, Lester, Richard T., Thorlund, Kristian, Mills, Edward J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1
_version_ 1783452684709265408
author Park, Jay J. H
Siden, Ellie
Zoratti, Michael J.
Dron, Louis
Harari, Ofir
Singer, Joel
Lester, Richard T.
Thorlund, Kristian
Mills, Edward J.
author_facet Park, Jay J. H
Siden, Ellie
Zoratti, Michael J.
Dron, Louis
Harari, Ofir
Singer, Joel
Lester, Richard T.
Thorlund, Kristian
Mills, Edward J.
author_sort Park, Jay J. H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced efficiency and a more ethical approach to trial evaluation. Despite the many advantages of these designs, they are infrequently used. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis of master protocols using a systematic literature search to determine what trials have been conducted and proposed for an overall goal of improving the literacy in this emerging concept. On July 8, 2019, English-language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and hand searches of published reviews and registries. RESULTS: We identified 83 master protocols (49 basket, 18 umbrella, and 16 platform trials). The number of master protocols has increased rapidly over the last five years. Most have been conducted in the US (n = 44/83) and investigated experimental drugs (n = 82/83) in the field of oncology (n = 76/83). The majority of basket trials were exploratory (i.e., phase I/II; n = 47/49) and not randomized (n = 44/49), and more than half (n = 28/48) investigated only a single intervention. The median sample size of basket trials was 205 participants (interquartile range, Q3-Q1 [IQR]: 500–90 = 410), and the median study duration was 22.3 (IQR: 74.1–42.9 = 31.1) months. Similar to basket trials, most umbrella trials were exploratory (n = 16/18), but the use of randomization was more common (n = 8/18). The median sample size of umbrella trials was 346 participants (IQR: 565–252 = 313), and the median study duration was 60.9 (IQR: 81.3–46.9 = 34.4) months. The median number of interventions investigated in umbrella trials was 5 (IQR: 6–4 = 2). The majority of platform trials were randomized (n = 15/16), and phase III investigation (n = 7/15; one did not report information on phase) was more common in platform trials with four of them using seamless II/III design. The median sample size was 892 (IQR: 1835–255 = 1580), and the median study duration was 58.9 (IQR: 101.3–36.9 = 64.4) months. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the number of master protocols will continue to increase at a rapid pace over the upcoming decades. More efforts to improve awareness and training are needed to apply these innovative trial design methods to fields outside of oncology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6751792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67517922019-09-23 Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols Park, Jay J. H Siden, Ellie Zoratti, Michael J. Dron, Louis Harari, Ofir Singer, Joel Lester, Richard T. Thorlund, Kristian Mills, Edward J. Trials Review BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced efficiency and a more ethical approach to trial evaluation. Despite the many advantages of these designs, they are infrequently used. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis of master protocols using a systematic literature search to determine what trials have been conducted and proposed for an overall goal of improving the literacy in this emerging concept. On July 8, 2019, English-language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and hand searches of published reviews and registries. RESULTS: We identified 83 master protocols (49 basket, 18 umbrella, and 16 platform trials). The number of master protocols has increased rapidly over the last five years. Most have been conducted in the US (n = 44/83) and investigated experimental drugs (n = 82/83) in the field of oncology (n = 76/83). The majority of basket trials were exploratory (i.e., phase I/II; n = 47/49) and not randomized (n = 44/49), and more than half (n = 28/48) investigated only a single intervention. The median sample size of basket trials was 205 participants (interquartile range, Q3-Q1 [IQR]: 500–90 = 410), and the median study duration was 22.3 (IQR: 74.1–42.9 = 31.1) months. Similar to basket trials, most umbrella trials were exploratory (n = 16/18), but the use of randomization was more common (n = 8/18). The median sample size of umbrella trials was 346 participants (IQR: 565–252 = 313), and the median study duration was 60.9 (IQR: 81.3–46.9 = 34.4) months. The median number of interventions investigated in umbrella trials was 5 (IQR: 6–4 = 2). The majority of platform trials were randomized (n = 15/16), and phase III investigation (n = 7/15; one did not report information on phase) was more common in platform trials with four of them using seamless II/III design. The median sample size was 892 (IQR: 1835–255 = 1580), and the median study duration was 58.9 (IQR: 101.3–36.9 = 64.4) months. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the number of master protocols will continue to increase at a rapid pace over the upcoming decades. More efforts to improve awareness and training are needed to apply these innovative trial design methods to fields outside of oncology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751792/ /pubmed/31533793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Park, Jay J. H
Siden, Ellie
Zoratti, Michael J.
Dron, Louis
Harari, Ofir
Singer, Joel
Lester, Richard T.
Thorlund, Kristian
Mills, Edward J.
Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title_full Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title_fullStr Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title_short Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
title_sort systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjayjh systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT sidenellie systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT zorattimichaelj systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT dronlouis systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT harariofir systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT singerjoel systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT lesterrichardt systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT thorlundkristian systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols
AT millsedwardj systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols