Cargando…
Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols
BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1 |
_version_ | 1783452684709265408 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jay J. H Siden, Ellie Zoratti, Michael J. Dron, Louis Harari, Ofir Singer, Joel Lester, Richard T. Thorlund, Kristian Mills, Edward J. |
author_facet | Park, Jay J. H Siden, Ellie Zoratti, Michael J. Dron, Louis Harari, Ofir Singer, Joel Lester, Richard T. Thorlund, Kristian Mills, Edward J. |
author_sort | Park, Jay J. H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced efficiency and a more ethical approach to trial evaluation. Despite the many advantages of these designs, they are infrequently used. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis of master protocols using a systematic literature search to determine what trials have been conducted and proposed for an overall goal of improving the literacy in this emerging concept. On July 8, 2019, English-language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and hand searches of published reviews and registries. RESULTS: We identified 83 master protocols (49 basket, 18 umbrella, and 16 platform trials). The number of master protocols has increased rapidly over the last five years. Most have been conducted in the US (n = 44/83) and investigated experimental drugs (n = 82/83) in the field of oncology (n = 76/83). The majority of basket trials were exploratory (i.e., phase I/II; n = 47/49) and not randomized (n = 44/49), and more than half (n = 28/48) investigated only a single intervention. The median sample size of basket trials was 205 participants (interquartile range, Q3-Q1 [IQR]: 500–90 = 410), and the median study duration was 22.3 (IQR: 74.1–42.9 = 31.1) months. Similar to basket trials, most umbrella trials were exploratory (n = 16/18), but the use of randomization was more common (n = 8/18). The median sample size of umbrella trials was 346 participants (IQR: 565–252 = 313), and the median study duration was 60.9 (IQR: 81.3–46.9 = 34.4) months. The median number of interventions investigated in umbrella trials was 5 (IQR: 6–4 = 2). The majority of platform trials were randomized (n = 15/16), and phase III investigation (n = 7/15; one did not report information on phase) was more common in platform trials with four of them using seamless II/III design. The median sample size was 892 (IQR: 1835–255 = 1580), and the median study duration was 58.9 (IQR: 101.3–36.9 = 64.4) months. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the number of master protocols will continue to increase at a rapid pace over the upcoming decades. More efforts to improve awareness and training are needed to apply these innovative trial design methods to fields outside of oncology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6751792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67517922019-09-23 Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols Park, Jay J. H Siden, Ellie Zoratti, Michael J. Dron, Louis Harari, Ofir Singer, Joel Lester, Richard T. Thorlund, Kristian Mills, Edward J. Trials Review BACKGROUND: Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced efficiency and a more ethical approach to trial evaluation. Despite the many advantages of these designs, they are infrequently used. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis of master protocols using a systematic literature search to determine what trials have been conducted and proposed for an overall goal of improving the literacy in this emerging concept. On July 8, 2019, English-language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and hand searches of published reviews and registries. RESULTS: We identified 83 master protocols (49 basket, 18 umbrella, and 16 platform trials). The number of master protocols has increased rapidly over the last five years. Most have been conducted in the US (n = 44/83) and investigated experimental drugs (n = 82/83) in the field of oncology (n = 76/83). The majority of basket trials were exploratory (i.e., phase I/II; n = 47/49) and not randomized (n = 44/49), and more than half (n = 28/48) investigated only a single intervention. The median sample size of basket trials was 205 participants (interquartile range, Q3-Q1 [IQR]: 500–90 = 410), and the median study duration was 22.3 (IQR: 74.1–42.9 = 31.1) months. Similar to basket trials, most umbrella trials were exploratory (n = 16/18), but the use of randomization was more common (n = 8/18). The median sample size of umbrella trials was 346 participants (IQR: 565–252 = 313), and the median study duration was 60.9 (IQR: 81.3–46.9 = 34.4) months. The median number of interventions investigated in umbrella trials was 5 (IQR: 6–4 = 2). The majority of platform trials were randomized (n = 15/16), and phase III investigation (n = 7/15; one did not report information on phase) was more common in platform trials with four of them using seamless II/III design. The median sample size was 892 (IQR: 1835–255 = 1580), and the median study duration was 58.9 (IQR: 101.3–36.9 = 64.4) months. CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that the number of master protocols will continue to increase at a rapid pace over the upcoming decades. More efforts to improve awareness and training are needed to apply these innovative trial design methods to fields outside of oncology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6751792/ /pubmed/31533793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Park, Jay J. H Siden, Ellie Zoratti, Michael J. Dron, Louis Harari, Ofir Singer, Joel Lester, Richard T. Thorlund, Kristian Mills, Edward J. Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title | Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title_full | Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title_short | Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
title_sort | systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6751792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31533793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjayjh systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT sidenellie systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT zorattimichaelj systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT dronlouis systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT harariofir systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT singerjoel systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT lesterrichardt systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT thorlundkristian systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols AT millsedwardj systematicreviewofbaskettrialsumbrellatrialsandplatformtrialsalandscapeanalysisofmasterprotocols |