Cargando…
Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method
An official method for determining food glycemic index (GI) was published by the Organization for International Standardization (ISO) in 2010, but its performance has not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to determine the intra- and inter-laboratory variation of food GI values measured using the 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11092218 |
_version_ | 1783455433858482176 |
---|---|
author | Wolever, Thomas M.S. Meynier, Alexandra Jenkins, Alexandra L. Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Atkinson, Fiona S. Gendre, David Leuillet, Sébastien Cazaubiel, Murielle Housez, Béatrice Vinoy, Sophie |
author_facet | Wolever, Thomas M.S. Meynier, Alexandra Jenkins, Alexandra L. Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Atkinson, Fiona S. Gendre, David Leuillet, Sébastien Cazaubiel, Murielle Housez, Béatrice Vinoy, Sophie |
author_sort | Wolever, Thomas M.S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An official method for determining food glycemic index (GI) was published by the Organization for International Standardization (ISO) in 2010, but its performance has not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to determine the intra- and inter-laboratory variation of food GI values measured using the 2010 ISO method. Three laboratories (Australia, Canada and France) determined the GI and insulinemic-index (II) of six foods in groups of 13–15 participants using the 2010 ISO method and intra- and inter-laboratory Standard Deviations (SDs) were calculated. Overall mean food GIs varied from 47 to 86 (p < 0.0001) with no significant difference among labs (p = 0.57) and no food × laboratory interaction (p = 0.20). Within-laboratory SD was similar among foods (range, 17.8–22.5; p = 0.49) but varied among laboratories (range 17.5–23.1; p = 0.047). Between-laboratory SD of mean food GI values ranged from 1.6 to 6.7 (mean, 5.1). Mean glucose and insulin responses varied among foods (p < 0.001) with insulin (p = 0.0037), but not glucose (p = 0.054), varying significantly among labs. Mean II varied among foods (p < 0.001) but not among labs (p = 0.94). In conclusion, we found that using the 2010 ISO method, the mean between-laboratory SD of GI was 5.1. This suggests that the ISO method is sufficiently precise to distinguish a mean GI = 55 from a mean GI ≥ 70 with 97–99% probability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6770275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67702752019-10-30 Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method Wolever, Thomas M.S. Meynier, Alexandra Jenkins, Alexandra L. Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Atkinson, Fiona S. Gendre, David Leuillet, Sébastien Cazaubiel, Murielle Housez, Béatrice Vinoy, Sophie Nutrients Article An official method for determining food glycemic index (GI) was published by the Organization for International Standardization (ISO) in 2010, but its performance has not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to determine the intra- and inter-laboratory variation of food GI values measured using the 2010 ISO method. Three laboratories (Australia, Canada and France) determined the GI and insulinemic-index (II) of six foods in groups of 13–15 participants using the 2010 ISO method and intra- and inter-laboratory Standard Deviations (SDs) were calculated. Overall mean food GIs varied from 47 to 86 (p < 0.0001) with no significant difference among labs (p = 0.57) and no food × laboratory interaction (p = 0.20). Within-laboratory SD was similar among foods (range, 17.8–22.5; p = 0.49) but varied among laboratories (range 17.5–23.1; p = 0.047). Between-laboratory SD of mean food GI values ranged from 1.6 to 6.7 (mean, 5.1). Mean glucose and insulin responses varied among foods (p < 0.001) with insulin (p = 0.0037), but not glucose (p = 0.054), varying significantly among labs. Mean II varied among foods (p < 0.001) but not among labs (p = 0.94). In conclusion, we found that using the 2010 ISO method, the mean between-laboratory SD of GI was 5.1. This suggests that the ISO method is sufficiently precise to distinguish a mean GI = 55 from a mean GI ≥ 70 with 97–99% probability. MDPI 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6770275/ /pubmed/31540317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11092218 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wolever, Thomas M.S. Meynier, Alexandra Jenkins, Alexandra L. Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Atkinson, Fiona S. Gendre, David Leuillet, Sébastien Cazaubiel, Murielle Housez, Béatrice Vinoy, Sophie Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title | Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title_full | Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title_fullStr | Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title_short | Glycemic Index and Insulinemic Index of Foods: An Interlaboratory Study Using the ISO 2010 Method |
title_sort | glycemic index and insulinemic index of foods: an interlaboratory study using the iso 2010 method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540317 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11092218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woleverthomasms glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT meynieralexandra glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT jenkinsalexandral glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT brandmillerjenniec glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT atkinsonfionas glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT gendredavid glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT leuilletsebastien glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT cazaubielmurielle glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT housezbeatrice glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method AT vinoysophie glycemicindexandinsulinemicindexoffoodsaninterlaboratorystudyusingtheiso2010method |