Cargando…

Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice

Tumor heterogeneity, especially intratumoral heterogeneity, is a primary reason for treatment failure. A single biopsy may not reflect the complete genomic architecture of the tumor needed to make therapeutic decisions. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is believed to overcome these limitations. We anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imperial, Robin, Nazer, Marjan, Ahmed, Zaheer, Kam, Audrey E., Pluard, Timothy J., Bahaj, Waled, Levy, Mia, Kuzel, Timothy M., Hayden, Dana M., Pappas, Sam G., Subramanian, Janakiraman, Masood, Ashiq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31546879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091399
_version_ 1783455434096508928
author Imperial, Robin
Nazer, Marjan
Ahmed, Zaheer
Kam, Audrey E.
Pluard, Timothy J.
Bahaj, Waled
Levy, Mia
Kuzel, Timothy M.
Hayden, Dana M.
Pappas, Sam G.
Subramanian, Janakiraman
Masood, Ashiq
author_facet Imperial, Robin
Nazer, Marjan
Ahmed, Zaheer
Kam, Audrey E.
Pluard, Timothy J.
Bahaj, Waled
Levy, Mia
Kuzel, Timothy M.
Hayden, Dana M.
Pappas, Sam G.
Subramanian, Janakiraman
Masood, Ashiq
author_sort Imperial, Robin
collection PubMed
description Tumor heterogeneity, especially intratumoral heterogeneity, is a primary reason for treatment failure. A single biopsy may not reflect the complete genomic architecture of the tumor needed to make therapeutic decisions. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is believed to overcome these limitations. We analyzed concordance between ctDNA and whole-exome sequencing/whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS) of tumor samples from patients with breast (n = 12), gastrointestinal (n = 20), lung (n = 19), and other tumor types (n = 13). Correlation in the driver, hotspot, and actionable alterations was studied. Three cases in which more-in-depth genomic analysis was required have been presented. A total 58% (37/64) of patients had at least one concordant mutation. Patients who had received systemic therapy before tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) and ctDNA analysis showed high concordance (78% (21/27) vs. 43% (12/28) p = 0.01, respectively). Obtaining both NGS and ctDNA increased actionable alterations from 28% (18/64) to 52% (33/64) in our patients. Twenty-one patients had mutually exclusive actionable alterations seen only in either tissue NGS or ctDNA samples. Somatic hotspot mutation analysis showed significant discordance between tissue NGS and ctDNA analysis, denoting significant tumor heterogeneity in these malignancies. Increased tissue tumor mutation burden (TMB) positively correlated with the number of ctDNA mutations in patients who had received systemic therapy, but not in treatment-naïve patients. Prior systemic therapy and TMB may affect concordance and should be taken into consideration in future studies. Incorporating driver, actionable, and hotspot analysis may help to further refine the correlation between these two platforms. Tissue NGS and ctDNA are complimentary, and if done in conjunction, may increase the detection rate of actionable alterations and potentially therapeutic targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6770276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67702762019-10-30 Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice Imperial, Robin Nazer, Marjan Ahmed, Zaheer Kam, Audrey E. Pluard, Timothy J. Bahaj, Waled Levy, Mia Kuzel, Timothy M. Hayden, Dana M. Pappas, Sam G. Subramanian, Janakiraman Masood, Ashiq Cancers (Basel) Article Tumor heterogeneity, especially intratumoral heterogeneity, is a primary reason for treatment failure. A single biopsy may not reflect the complete genomic architecture of the tumor needed to make therapeutic decisions. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is believed to overcome these limitations. We analyzed concordance between ctDNA and whole-exome sequencing/whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS) of tumor samples from patients with breast (n = 12), gastrointestinal (n = 20), lung (n = 19), and other tumor types (n = 13). Correlation in the driver, hotspot, and actionable alterations was studied. Three cases in which more-in-depth genomic analysis was required have been presented. A total 58% (37/64) of patients had at least one concordant mutation. Patients who had received systemic therapy before tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) and ctDNA analysis showed high concordance (78% (21/27) vs. 43% (12/28) p = 0.01, respectively). Obtaining both NGS and ctDNA increased actionable alterations from 28% (18/64) to 52% (33/64) in our patients. Twenty-one patients had mutually exclusive actionable alterations seen only in either tissue NGS or ctDNA samples. Somatic hotspot mutation analysis showed significant discordance between tissue NGS and ctDNA analysis, denoting significant tumor heterogeneity in these malignancies. Increased tissue tumor mutation burden (TMB) positively correlated with the number of ctDNA mutations in patients who had received systemic therapy, but not in treatment-naïve patients. Prior systemic therapy and TMB may affect concordance and should be taken into consideration in future studies. Incorporating driver, actionable, and hotspot analysis may help to further refine the correlation between these two platforms. Tissue NGS and ctDNA are complimentary, and if done in conjunction, may increase the detection rate of actionable alterations and potentially therapeutic targets. MDPI 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6770276/ /pubmed/31546879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091399 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Imperial, Robin
Nazer, Marjan
Ahmed, Zaheer
Kam, Audrey E.
Pluard, Timothy J.
Bahaj, Waled
Levy, Mia
Kuzel, Timothy M.
Hayden, Dana M.
Pappas, Sam G.
Subramanian, Janakiraman
Masood, Ashiq
Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title_full Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title_short Matched Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) of Tumor Tissue with Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Analysis: Complementary Modalities in Clinical Practice
title_sort matched whole-genome sequencing (wgs) and whole-exome sequencing (wes) of tumor tissue with circulating tumor dna (ctdna) analysis: complementary modalities in clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31546879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091399
work_keys_str_mv AT imperialrobin matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT nazermarjan matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT ahmedzaheer matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT kamaudreye matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT pluardtimothyj matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT bahajwaled matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT levymia matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT kuzeltimothym matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT haydendanam matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT pappassamg matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT subramanianjanakiraman matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice
AT masoodashiq matchedwholegenomesequencingwgsandwholeexomesequencingwesoftumortissuewithcirculatingtumordnactdnaanalysiscomplementarymodalitiesinclinicalpractice