Cargando…
Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment
Oxidation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can impact their efficacy and may therefore represent critical quality attributes (CQA) that require evaluation. To complement classical CQA, bevacizumab and infliximab were subjected to oxidative stress by H(2)O(2) for 24, 48, or 72 h to probe their oxidati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030062 |
_version_ | 1783457644269273088 |
---|---|
author | Dyck, Yan Felix Karl Rehm, Daniel Joseph, Jan Felix Winkler, Karsten Sandig, Volker Jabs, Wolfgang Parr, Maria Kristina |
author_facet | Dyck, Yan Felix Karl Rehm, Daniel Joseph, Jan Felix Winkler, Karsten Sandig, Volker Jabs, Wolfgang Parr, Maria Kristina |
author_sort | Dyck, Yan Felix Karl |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oxidation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can impact their efficacy and may therefore represent critical quality attributes (CQA) that require evaluation. To complement classical CQA, bevacizumab and infliximab were subjected to oxidative stress by H(2)O(2) for 24, 48, or 72 h to probe their oxidation susceptibility. For investigation, a middle-up approach was used utilizing liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). In both mAbs, the Fc/2 subunit was completely oxidized. Additional oxidations were found in the light chain (LC) and in the Fd’ subunit of infliximab, but not in bevacizumab. By direct comparison of methionine positions, the oxidized residues in infliximab were assigned to M55 in LC and M18 in Fd’. The forced oxidation approach was further exploited for comparison of respective biosimilar products. Both for bevacizumab and infliximab, comparison of posttranslational modification profiles demonstrated high similarity of the unstressed reference product (RP) and the biosimilar (BS). However, for bevacizumab, comparison after forced oxidation revealed a higher susceptibility of the BS compared to the RP. It may thus be considered a useful tool for biopharmaceutical engineering, biosimilarity assessment, as well as for quality control of protein drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6783961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67839612019-10-16 Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment Dyck, Yan Felix Karl Rehm, Daniel Joseph, Jan Felix Winkler, Karsten Sandig, Volker Jabs, Wolfgang Parr, Maria Kristina Bioengineering (Basel) Article Oxidation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can impact their efficacy and may therefore represent critical quality attributes (CQA) that require evaluation. To complement classical CQA, bevacizumab and infliximab were subjected to oxidative stress by H(2)O(2) for 24, 48, or 72 h to probe their oxidation susceptibility. For investigation, a middle-up approach was used utilizing liquid chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). In both mAbs, the Fc/2 subunit was completely oxidized. Additional oxidations were found in the light chain (LC) and in the Fd’ subunit of infliximab, but not in bevacizumab. By direct comparison of methionine positions, the oxidized residues in infliximab were assigned to M55 in LC and M18 in Fd’. The forced oxidation approach was further exploited for comparison of respective biosimilar products. Both for bevacizumab and infliximab, comparison of posttranslational modification profiles demonstrated high similarity of the unstressed reference product (RP) and the biosimilar (BS). However, for bevacizumab, comparison after forced oxidation revealed a higher susceptibility of the BS compared to the RP. It may thus be considered a useful tool for biopharmaceutical engineering, biosimilarity assessment, as well as for quality control of protein drugs. MDPI 2019-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6783961/ /pubmed/31330921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030062 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dyck, Yan Felix Karl Rehm, Daniel Joseph, Jan Felix Winkler, Karsten Sandig, Volker Jabs, Wolfgang Parr, Maria Kristina Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title | Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title_full | Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title_fullStr | Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title_short | Forced Degradation Testing as Complementary Tool for Biosimilarity Assessment |
title_sort | forced degradation testing as complementary tool for biosimilarity assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6783961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6030062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyckyanfelixkarl forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT rehmdaniel forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT josephjanfelix forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT winklerkarsten forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT sandigvolker forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT jabswolfgang forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment AT parrmariakristina forceddegradationtestingascomplementarytoolforbiosimilarityassessment |