Cargando…

Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss

Pragmatic language ability refers to the ability to use language in a social context. It has been found to be correlated with success in general education for deaf and hard of hearing children. It is therefore of great importance to study why deaf and hard of hearing children often perform more poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Socher, Michaela, Lyxell, Björn, Ellis, Rachel, Gärskog, Malin, Hedström, Ingrid, Wass, Malin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31649586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02243
_version_ 1783459295891816448
author Socher, Michaela
Lyxell, Björn
Ellis, Rachel
Gärskog, Malin
Hedström, Ingrid
Wass, Malin
author_facet Socher, Michaela
Lyxell, Björn
Ellis, Rachel
Gärskog, Malin
Hedström, Ingrid
Wass, Malin
author_sort Socher, Michaela
collection PubMed
description Pragmatic language ability refers to the ability to use language in a social context. It has been found to be correlated with success in general education for deaf and hard of hearing children. It is therefore of great importance to study why deaf and hard of hearing children often perform more poorly than their hearing peers on tests measuring pragmatic language ability. In the current study the Pragmatics Profile questionnaire from the CELF-IV battery was used to measure pragmatic language ability in children using cochlear implants (N = 14) and children without a hearing loss (N = 34). No significant difference was found between the children with cochlear implants (CI) and the children without hearing loss (HL) for the sum score of the pragmatics language measure. However, 35.71% of the children with CI performed below age norm, while only 5.89% of the children without HL performed below age norm. In addition, when dividing the sum score into three sub-measures: Rituals and Conversational skills (RCS), Asking for, Giving, and Responding to Information (AGRI), and Nonverbal Communication skills (NCS), significant differences between the groups were found for the NCS measure and a tendency for a difference was found for the RCS measure. In addition, all three sub-measures (NCS, AGRI, RCS) were correlated to verbal fluency in the children with CI, but not the children without HL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6794448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67944482019-10-24 Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss Socher, Michaela Lyxell, Björn Ellis, Rachel Gärskog, Malin Hedström, Ingrid Wass, Malin Front Psychol Psychology Pragmatic language ability refers to the ability to use language in a social context. It has been found to be correlated with success in general education for deaf and hard of hearing children. It is therefore of great importance to study why deaf and hard of hearing children often perform more poorly than their hearing peers on tests measuring pragmatic language ability. In the current study the Pragmatics Profile questionnaire from the CELF-IV battery was used to measure pragmatic language ability in children using cochlear implants (N = 14) and children without a hearing loss (N = 34). No significant difference was found between the children with cochlear implants (CI) and the children without hearing loss (HL) for the sum score of the pragmatics language measure. However, 35.71% of the children with CI performed below age norm, while only 5.89% of the children without HL performed below age norm. In addition, when dividing the sum score into three sub-measures: Rituals and Conversational skills (RCS), Asking for, Giving, and Responding to Information (AGRI), and Nonverbal Communication skills (NCS), significant differences between the groups were found for the NCS measure and a tendency for a difference was found for the RCS measure. In addition, all three sub-measures (NCS, AGRI, RCS) were correlated to verbal fluency in the children with CI, but not the children without HL. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6794448/ /pubmed/31649586 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02243 Text en Copyright © 2019 Socher, Lyxell, Ellis, Gärskog, Hedström and Wass. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Socher, Michaela
Lyxell, Björn
Ellis, Rachel
Gärskog, Malin
Hedström, Ingrid
Wass, Malin
Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title_full Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title_fullStr Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title_short Pragmatic Language Skills: A Comparison of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children Without Hearing Loss
title_sort pragmatic language skills: a comparison of children with cochlear implants and children without hearing loss
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31649586
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02243
work_keys_str_mv AT sochermichaela pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss
AT lyxellbjorn pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss
AT ellisrachel pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss
AT garskogmalin pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss
AT hedstromingrid pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss
AT wassmalin pragmaticlanguageskillsacomparisonofchildrenwithcochlearimplantsandchildrenwithouthearingloss