Cargando…
Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop
The present study mainly consists of a re-evaluation of the rate at which C(12)E(8), a typical non-ionic detergent used for membrane studies, is able to dissociate from biological membranes, with sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane vesicles being used as an example. Utilizing a brominated derivative of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222932 |
_version_ | 1783459439307653120 |
---|---|
author | Champeil, Philippe de Foresta, Béatrice Picard, Martin Gauron, Carole Georgin, Dominique le Maire, Marc Møller, Jesper V. Lenoir, Guillaume Montigny, Cédric |
author_facet | Champeil, Philippe de Foresta, Béatrice Picard, Martin Gauron, Carole Georgin, Dominique le Maire, Marc Møller, Jesper V. Lenoir, Guillaume Montigny, Cédric |
author_sort | Champeil, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study mainly consists of a re-evaluation of the rate at which C(12)E(8), a typical non-ionic detergent used for membrane studies, is able to dissociate from biological membranes, with sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane vesicles being used as an example. Utilizing a brominated derivative of C(12)E(8) and now stopped-flow fluorescence instead of rapid filtration, we found that the rate of dissociation of this detergent from these membranes, merely perturbed with non-solubilizing concentrations of detergent, was significantly faster (t(1/2) < 10 ms) than what had previously been determined (t(1/2) ~300–400 ms) from experiments based on a rapid filtration protocol using (14)C-labeled C(12)E(8) and glass fiber filters (Binding of a non-ionic detergent to membranes: flip-flop rate and location on the bilayer, by Marc le Maire, Jesper Møller and Philippe Champeil, Biochemistry (1987) Vol 26, pages 4803–4810). We here pinpoint a methodological problem of the earlier rapid filtration experiments, and we suggest that the true overall dissociation rate of C(12)E(8) is indeed much faster than previously thought. We also exemplify the case of brominated dodecyl-maltoside, whose kinetics for overall binding to and dissociation from membranes comprise both a rapid and a sower phase, the latter being presumably due to flip-flop between the two leaflets of the membrane. Consequently, equilibrium is reached only after a few seconds for DDM. This work thereby emphasizes the interest of using the fluorescence quenching associated with brominated detergents for studying the kinetics of detergent/membrane interactions, namely association, dissociation and flip-flop rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6795424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67954242019-10-20 Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop Champeil, Philippe de Foresta, Béatrice Picard, Martin Gauron, Carole Georgin, Dominique le Maire, Marc Møller, Jesper V. Lenoir, Guillaume Montigny, Cédric PLoS One Research Article The present study mainly consists of a re-evaluation of the rate at which C(12)E(8), a typical non-ionic detergent used for membrane studies, is able to dissociate from biological membranes, with sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane vesicles being used as an example. Utilizing a brominated derivative of C(12)E(8) and now stopped-flow fluorescence instead of rapid filtration, we found that the rate of dissociation of this detergent from these membranes, merely perturbed with non-solubilizing concentrations of detergent, was significantly faster (t(1/2) < 10 ms) than what had previously been determined (t(1/2) ~300–400 ms) from experiments based on a rapid filtration protocol using (14)C-labeled C(12)E(8) and glass fiber filters (Binding of a non-ionic detergent to membranes: flip-flop rate and location on the bilayer, by Marc le Maire, Jesper Møller and Philippe Champeil, Biochemistry (1987) Vol 26, pages 4803–4810). We here pinpoint a methodological problem of the earlier rapid filtration experiments, and we suggest that the true overall dissociation rate of C(12)E(8) is indeed much faster than previously thought. We also exemplify the case of brominated dodecyl-maltoside, whose kinetics for overall binding to and dissociation from membranes comprise both a rapid and a sower phase, the latter being presumably due to flip-flop between the two leaflets of the membrane. Consequently, equilibrium is reached only after a few seconds for DDM. This work thereby emphasizes the interest of using the fluorescence quenching associated with brominated detergents for studying the kinetics of detergent/membrane interactions, namely association, dissociation and flip-flop rates. Public Library of Science 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6795424/ /pubmed/31618200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222932 Text en © 2019 Champeil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Champeil, Philippe de Foresta, Béatrice Picard, Martin Gauron, Carole Georgin, Dominique le Maire, Marc Møller, Jesper V. Lenoir, Guillaume Montigny, Cédric Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title | Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title_full | Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title_fullStr | Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title_full_unstemmed | Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title_short | Interaction of detergents with biological membranes: Comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
title_sort | interaction of detergents with biological membranes: comparison of fluorescence assays with filtration protocols and implications for the rates of detergent association, dissociation and flip-flop |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6795424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT champeilphilippe interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT deforestabeatrice interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT picardmartin interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT gauroncarole interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT georgindominique interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT lemairemarc interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT møllerjesperv interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT lenoirguillaume interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop AT montignycedric interactionofdetergentswithbiologicalmembranescomparisonoffluorescenceassayswithfiltrationprotocolsandimplicationsfortheratesofdetergentassociationdissociationandflipflop |