Cargando…

Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students

This study investigated the effect of motor learning with informational feedback into response to anaerobic exercises with and without motor learning tasks in handball physical education university students. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (EG, n = 10) and cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermassi, Souhail, Sellami, Maha, Bouhafs, El Ghali, Schwesig, René, De Giorgio, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02097
_version_ 1783459957350334464
author Hermassi, Souhail
Sellami, Maha
Bouhafs, El Ghali
Schwesig, René
De Giorgio, Andrea
author_facet Hermassi, Souhail
Sellami, Maha
Bouhafs, El Ghali
Schwesig, René
De Giorgio, Andrea
author_sort Hermassi, Souhail
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effect of motor learning with informational feedback into response to anaerobic exercises with and without motor learning tasks in handball physical education university students. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (EG, n = 10) and control group (CG, n = 10). Measurements of T-half test, 15-m and 30-m sprints, and ZIG-ZAG test were assessed in both groups before (T1), between (T2) a 4-week intervention program, and after (T3) an 8-week intervention program, which included agility and speed teaching with (EG) or without (CG) informational feedback (i.e., verbal instruction). The test-retest reliability for all tests was excellent, and the ICC ranged from 0.76 (ZIG-ZAG test) to 0.99 (Agility T test). The interday measurement error was clearly below 1% in all tests (CV range: 0.2–0.8). Time effects for the Agility T test (p = 0.012, [Formula: see text] = 0.245) and the 15-m sprint (p = 0.035, [Formula: see text] = 0.190) were found. For the Agility T test, a total interaction effect (p = 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.380) and a partial interaction effect were calculated between T2 and T3 (p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.603). A large effect size (d = 0.87) was observed in the EG from T2 to T3. The second relevant (d ≥ 0.5) effect size was calculated for the parameter sprint 30 m. The CG showed a significant sprint performance reduction from T2 to T3 (d = −0.60; parameter: sprint 30 m). All other effect sizes were less than 0.44. The ZIG-ZAG test revealed the largest main and partial effect sizes for all parameters. The EG showed the largest improvement (d = 2.00) between T2 and T3. The results demonstrate that motor learning with informational feedback improves performances of Agility T test, sprint, and ZIG-ZAG performance. It appears that a well-formulated verbal instruction may induce performance enhancement in young trainees in educational environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6798030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67980302019-11-01 Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students Hermassi, Souhail Sellami, Maha Bouhafs, El Ghali Schwesig, René De Giorgio, Andrea Front Psychol Psychology This study investigated the effect of motor learning with informational feedback into response to anaerobic exercises with and without motor learning tasks in handball physical education university students. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (EG, n = 10) and control group (CG, n = 10). Measurements of T-half test, 15-m and 30-m sprints, and ZIG-ZAG test were assessed in both groups before (T1), between (T2) a 4-week intervention program, and after (T3) an 8-week intervention program, which included agility and speed teaching with (EG) or without (CG) informational feedback (i.e., verbal instruction). The test-retest reliability for all tests was excellent, and the ICC ranged from 0.76 (ZIG-ZAG test) to 0.99 (Agility T test). The interday measurement error was clearly below 1% in all tests (CV range: 0.2–0.8). Time effects for the Agility T test (p = 0.012, [Formula: see text] = 0.245) and the 15-m sprint (p = 0.035, [Formula: see text] = 0.190) were found. For the Agility T test, a total interaction effect (p = 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.380) and a partial interaction effect were calculated between T2 and T3 (p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.603). A large effect size (d = 0.87) was observed in the EG from T2 to T3. The second relevant (d ≥ 0.5) effect size was calculated for the parameter sprint 30 m. The CG showed a significant sprint performance reduction from T2 to T3 (d = −0.60; parameter: sprint 30 m). All other effect sizes were less than 0.44. The ZIG-ZAG test revealed the largest main and partial effect sizes for all parameters. The EG showed the largest improvement (d = 2.00) between T2 and T3. The results demonstrate that motor learning with informational feedback improves performances of Agility T test, sprint, and ZIG-ZAG performance. It appears that a well-formulated verbal instruction may induce performance enhancement in young trainees in educational environment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6798030/ /pubmed/31681055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02097 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hermassi, Sellami, Bouhafs, Schwesig and De Giorgio. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hermassi, Souhail
Sellami, Maha
Bouhafs, El Ghali
Schwesig, René
De Giorgio, Andrea
Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title_full Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title_fullStr Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title_short Effect of Verbal Instruction on Motor Learning Ability of Anaerobic and Explosive Exercises in Physical Education University Students
title_sort effect of verbal instruction on motor learning ability of anaerobic and explosive exercises in physical education university students
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6798030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31681055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02097
work_keys_str_mv AT hermassisouhail effectofverbalinstructiononmotorlearningabilityofanaerobicandexplosiveexercisesinphysicaleducationuniversitystudents
AT sellamimaha effectofverbalinstructiononmotorlearningabilityofanaerobicandexplosiveexercisesinphysicaleducationuniversitystudents
AT bouhafselghali effectofverbalinstructiononmotorlearningabilityofanaerobicandexplosiveexercisesinphysicaleducationuniversitystudents
AT schwesigrene effectofverbalinstructiononmotorlearningabilityofanaerobicandexplosiveexercisesinphysicaleducationuniversitystudents
AT degiorgioandrea effectofverbalinstructiononmotorlearningabilityofanaerobicandexplosiveexercisesinphysicaleducationuniversitystudents