Cargando…

Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination

BACKGROUND: Examinees often believe that changing answers will lower their scores; however, empirical studies suggest that allowing examinees to change responses may improve their performance in classroom assessments. To date, no studies have been able to examine answer changes during large scale pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Wenli, Harik, Polina, Clauser, Brian E., Paniagua, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1816-3
_version_ 1783461650724028416
author Ouyang, Wenli
Harik, Polina
Clauser, Brian E.
Paniagua, Miguel A.
author_facet Ouyang, Wenli
Harik, Polina
Clauser, Brian E.
Paniagua, Miguel A.
author_sort Ouyang, Wenli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Examinees often believe that changing answers will lower their scores; however, empirical studies suggest that allowing examinees to change responses may improve their performance in classroom assessments. To date, no studies have been able to examine answer changes during large scale professional credentialing or licensing examinations. METHODS: In this study, we expand the research on answer changes by analyzing responses from 27,830 examinees who completed the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) examination between August of 2015 and August of 2016. RESULTS: The results showed that although 68% of examinees changed at least one item, the overall average number of changes was small. Among the examinees who changed answers, approximately 45% increased their scores and approximately 28% decreased their scores. On average, examinees spent shortest time on the item changes from wrong to right and they were more likely to change their scores from wrong to right than right to wrong. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous studies, these findings support the beneficial effects of answer changes in high-stakes medical examinations and suggest that examinees who are overly cautious about changing answers may put themselves at a disadvantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6806526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68065262019-10-28 Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination Ouyang, Wenli Harik, Polina Clauser, Brian E. Paniagua, Miguel A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Examinees often believe that changing answers will lower their scores; however, empirical studies suggest that allowing examinees to change responses may improve their performance in classroom assessments. To date, no studies have been able to examine answer changes during large scale professional credentialing or licensing examinations. METHODS: In this study, we expand the research on answer changes by analyzing responses from 27,830 examinees who completed the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) examination between August of 2015 and August of 2016. RESULTS: The results showed that although 68% of examinees changed at least one item, the overall average number of changes was small. Among the examinees who changed answers, approximately 45% increased their scores and approximately 28% decreased their scores. On average, examinees spent shortest time on the item changes from wrong to right and they were more likely to change their scores from wrong to right than right to wrong. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous studies, these findings support the beneficial effects of answer changes in high-stakes medical examinations and suggest that examinees who are overly cautious about changing answers may put themselves at a disadvantage. BioMed Central 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6806526/ /pubmed/31647012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1816-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ouyang, Wenli
Harik, Polina
Clauser, Brian E.
Paniagua, Miguel A.
Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title_full Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title_fullStr Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title_short Investigation of answer changes on the USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination
title_sort investigation of answer changes on the usmle® step 2 clinical knowledge examination
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6806526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1816-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangwenli investigationofanswerchangesontheusmlestep2clinicalknowledgeexamination
AT harikpolina investigationofanswerchangesontheusmlestep2clinicalknowledgeexamination
AT clauserbriane investigationofanswerchangesontheusmlestep2clinicalknowledgeexamination
AT paniaguamiguela investigationofanswerchangesontheusmlestep2clinicalknowledgeexamination