Cargando…

A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure

OBJECTIVE: To test a novel method to select spermatozoa with high chromatin integrity. DESIGN: Specimens with high sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) were selected by density gradient selection (DGS) and microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS). SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Ejaculates from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parrella, Alessandra, Keating, Derek, Cheung, Stephanie, Xie, Philip, Stewart, Joshua D., Rosenwaks, Zev, Palermo, Gianpiero D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01543-5
_version_ 1783464498302025728
author Parrella, Alessandra
Keating, Derek
Cheung, Stephanie
Xie, Philip
Stewart, Joshua D.
Rosenwaks, Zev
Palermo, Gianpiero D.
author_facet Parrella, Alessandra
Keating, Derek
Cheung, Stephanie
Xie, Philip
Stewart, Joshua D.
Rosenwaks, Zev
Palermo, Gianpiero D.
author_sort Parrella, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test a novel method to select spermatozoa with high chromatin integrity. DESIGN: Specimens with high sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) were selected by density gradient selection (DGS) and microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS). SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Ejaculates from consenting men were processed by DGS/MSS. Couples underwent ICSI cycles with spermatozoa processed by DGS/MSS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated after embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S): SCF was measured by TUNEL. ICSI with spermatozoa selected by DGS and MSS was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, embryo implantation, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between DGS and MSS. RESULT(S): A total of 23 men had an average SCF of 20.7 ± 10%. After DGS and MSS, the SCF was 12.5 ± 5% and 1.8 ± 1%, respectively. In couples who underwent ICSI, the average SCF was 28.8 ± 9%, which fell to 21.0 ± 9% after DGS and 1.3 ± 0.7% after MSS. Four couples underwent 11 ICSI cycles with DGS and achieved one (25%) pregnancy that resulted in pregnancy loss. In four subsequent ICSI cycles with MSS, an ongoing clinical pregnancy rate of 50% was achieved. Five additional couples underwent 12 cycles of ICSI with DGS. After preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, 30.3% of the embryos were euploid. One pregnancy was achieved, resulting in pregnancy loss. With MSS, 31.5% of the embryos were euploid and 4 couples obtained a pregnancy. Finally, sixteen couples underwent 20 ICSI cycles solely with MSS at our center. Of these couples, 8 had failed 13 ICSI cycles with DGS elsewhere. These couples achieved an overall implantation of 34.5% (10/29) and a pregnancy rate of 58.8% (10/17). CONCLUSION(S): Microfluidic selection yielded spermatozoa with optimal genomic integrity and improved chances of obtaining a euploid conceptus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6823295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68232952019-11-06 A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure Parrella, Alessandra Keating, Derek Cheung, Stephanie Xie, Philip Stewart, Joshua D. Rosenwaks, Zev Palermo, Gianpiero D. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies OBJECTIVE: To test a novel method to select spermatozoa with high chromatin integrity. DESIGN: Specimens with high sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) were selected by density gradient selection (DGS) and microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS). SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Ejaculates from consenting men were processed by DGS/MSS. Couples underwent ICSI cycles with spermatozoa processed by DGS/MSS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated after embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S): SCF was measured by TUNEL. ICSI with spermatozoa selected by DGS and MSS was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, embryo implantation, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between DGS and MSS. RESULT(S): A total of 23 men had an average SCF of 20.7 ± 10%. After DGS and MSS, the SCF was 12.5 ± 5% and 1.8 ± 1%, respectively. In couples who underwent ICSI, the average SCF was 28.8 ± 9%, which fell to 21.0 ± 9% after DGS and 1.3 ± 0.7% after MSS. Four couples underwent 11 ICSI cycles with DGS and achieved one (25%) pregnancy that resulted in pregnancy loss. In four subsequent ICSI cycles with MSS, an ongoing clinical pregnancy rate of 50% was achieved. Five additional couples underwent 12 cycles of ICSI with DGS. After preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, 30.3% of the embryos were euploid. One pregnancy was achieved, resulting in pregnancy loss. With MSS, 31.5% of the embryos were euploid and 4 couples obtained a pregnancy. Finally, sixteen couples underwent 20 ICSI cycles solely with MSS at our center. Of these couples, 8 had failed 13 ICSI cycles with DGS elsewhere. These couples achieved an overall implantation of 34.5% (10/29) and a pregnancy rate of 58.8% (10/17). CONCLUSION(S): Microfluidic selection yielded spermatozoa with optimal genomic integrity and improved chances of obtaining a euploid conceptus. Springer US 2019-08-16 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6823295/ /pubmed/31418108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01543-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Parrella, Alessandra
Keating, Derek
Cheung, Stephanie
Xie, Philip
Stewart, Joshua D.
Rosenwaks, Zev
Palermo, Gianpiero D.
A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title_full A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title_fullStr A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title_full_unstemmed A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title_short A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure
title_sort treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm dna integrity and recurrent art failure
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6823295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01543-5
work_keys_str_mv AT parrellaalessandra atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT keatingderek atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT cheungstephanie atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT xiephilip atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT stewartjoshuad atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT rosenwakszev atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT palermogianpierod atreatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT parrellaalessandra treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT keatingderek treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT cheungstephanie treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT xiephilip treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT stewartjoshuad treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT rosenwakszev treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure
AT palermogianpierod treatmentapproachforcoupleswithdisruptedspermdnaintegrityandrecurrentartfailure