Cargando…

Dose Determination for a Fixed-Dose Drug Combination: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial for Tiotropium/Olodaterol Versus Tiotropium in Patients with COPD

INTRODUCTION: During the clinical development of a fixed-dose combination of drugs, it is best practice to conduct dose-finding studies to determine the optimal dose of each component. The aims of this phase II dose-finding study were to confirm the lung function benefit of adding olodaterol to tiot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maltais, François, Hamilton, Alan, Voß, Florian, Maleki-Yazdi, M. Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6824359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30843141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00911-y
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: During the clinical development of a fixed-dose combination of drugs, it is best practice to conduct dose-finding studies to determine the optimal dose of each component. The aims of this phase II dose-finding study were to confirm the lung function benefit of adding olodaterol to tiotropium, describe the dose–response relationship of olodaterol in combination with tiotropium 5 μg, and compare it with the dose response of olodaterol monotherapy. METHODS: In this double-blind, parallel-group trial, patients were randomized to receive either tiotropium 5 μg or a fixed-dose combination of tiotropium 5 μg with olodaterol 2 μg, 5 μg, or 10 μg, delivered once daily via the Respimat(®) for 4 weeks (NCT00696020). Patients had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ≥ 30 and < 80% of predicted normal. The primary endpoint was trough FEV(1) response (change from baseline) after 4 weeks. Secondary endpoints included FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) over 6 h after dosing. RESULTS: Compared with tiotropium 5 μg, mean (standard error) trough FEV(1) increased with the addition of olodaterol 2 μg by 0.024 L (0.027), olodaterol 5 μg by 0.033 L (0.027), and olodaterol 10 μg by 0.057 L (0.027). Statistically significant improvements in FEV(1) versus tiotropium were seen across all timepoints up to 6 h with all doses of tiotropium/olodaterol. Similar results were observed for FVC. CONCLUSION: There was a benefit of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium monotherapy in FEV(1) and FVC. There was a dose–response relationship for olodaterol on top of tiotropium for FEV(1) and FVC similar to the dose response previously seen for olodaterol monotherapy. These results, together with the results of a study investigating the dose response of tiotropium on top of olodaterol, helped to inform the dose selection for the phase III studies. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.