Cargando…

Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells

BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raghav, Pawan Kumar, Kumar, Rajesh, Kumar, Vinod, Raghava, Gajendra P. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910
_version_ 1783464983281008640
author Raghav, Pawan Kumar
Kumar, Rajesh
Kumar, Vinod
Raghava, Gajendra P. S.
author_facet Raghav, Pawan Kumar
Kumar, Rajesh
Kumar, Vinod
Raghava, Gajendra P. S.
author_sort Raghav, Pawan Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutations in more than 40 cancer types. However, a little information is available about the functional impact of each Bcl‐2 and Bax mutation on the pathogenesis of cancer. METHODS: The mutational data from cancer tissues and cell lines were retrieved from the cBioPortal web resource. The 13 mutated Bcl‐2 and wild‐type Bax complexes with experimentally verified binding were identified from previous studies wherein, binding for all complexes was reportedly disrupted except one. Several protein–protein docking methods such as ClusPro, HDOCK, PatchDock, FireDock, InterEVDock2 and several mutation prediction methods such as PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been used to predict the effect of mutation to disrupt the binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax. The result obtained was compared with the known experimental data. RESULTS: The protein–protein docking method, ClusPro, employed in the present study confirmed that the binding affinity of 11 out of 13 complexes decreases. Similarly, binding affinity computed for all the 10 wild‐type Bcl‐2 and mutated Bax complexes agreed with experimentally verified results. CONCLUSION: Several methods like PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been developed to predict cancer‐associated or deleterious mutations, but no method is available to predict apoptosis‐inducing mutations. Thus, in this study, we have examined the mutations in Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins that disrupt their binding, which is crucial for inducing apoptosis to eradicate cancer. This study suggests that protein–protein docking methods can play a significant role in the identification of hotspot mutations in Bcl‐2 or Bax that can disrupt their binding with wild‐type partner to induce apoptosis in cancer cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6825947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68259472019-11-07 Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells Raghav, Pawan Kumar Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vinod Raghava, Gajendra P. S. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutations in more than 40 cancer types. However, a little information is available about the functional impact of each Bcl‐2 and Bax mutation on the pathogenesis of cancer. METHODS: The mutational data from cancer tissues and cell lines were retrieved from the cBioPortal web resource. The 13 mutated Bcl‐2 and wild‐type Bax complexes with experimentally verified binding were identified from previous studies wherein, binding for all complexes was reportedly disrupted except one. Several protein–protein docking methods such as ClusPro, HDOCK, PatchDock, FireDock, InterEVDock2 and several mutation prediction methods such as PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been used to predict the effect of mutation to disrupt the binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax. The result obtained was compared with the known experimental data. RESULTS: The protein–protein docking method, ClusPro, employed in the present study confirmed that the binding affinity of 11 out of 13 complexes decreases. Similarly, binding affinity computed for all the 10 wild‐type Bcl‐2 and mutated Bax complexes agreed with experimentally verified results. CONCLUSION: Several methods like PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been developed to predict cancer‐associated or deleterious mutations, but no method is available to predict apoptosis‐inducing mutations. Thus, in this study, we have examined the mutations in Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins that disrupt their binding, which is crucial for inducing apoptosis to eradicate cancer. This study suggests that protein–protein docking methods can play a significant role in the identification of hotspot mutations in Bcl‐2 or Bax that can disrupt their binding with wild‐type partner to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6825947/ /pubmed/31490001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Raghav, Pawan Kumar
Kumar, Rajesh
Kumar, Vinod
Raghava, Gajendra P. S.
Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title_full Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title_fullStr Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title_full_unstemmed Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title_short Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
title_sort docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between bcl‐2 and bax proteins: inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910
work_keys_str_mv AT raghavpawankumar dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells
AT kumarrajesh dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells
AT kumarvinod dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells
AT raghavagajendraps dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells