Cargando…
Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells
BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910 |
_version_ | 1783464983281008640 |
---|---|
author | Raghav, Pawan Kumar Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vinod Raghava, Gajendra P. S. |
author_facet | Raghav, Pawan Kumar Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vinod Raghava, Gajendra P. S. |
author_sort | Raghav, Pawan Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutations in more than 40 cancer types. However, a little information is available about the functional impact of each Bcl‐2 and Bax mutation on the pathogenesis of cancer. METHODS: The mutational data from cancer tissues and cell lines were retrieved from the cBioPortal web resource. The 13 mutated Bcl‐2 and wild‐type Bax complexes with experimentally verified binding were identified from previous studies wherein, binding for all complexes was reportedly disrupted except one. Several protein–protein docking methods such as ClusPro, HDOCK, PatchDock, FireDock, InterEVDock2 and several mutation prediction methods such as PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been used to predict the effect of mutation to disrupt the binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax. The result obtained was compared with the known experimental data. RESULTS: The protein–protein docking method, ClusPro, employed in the present study confirmed that the binding affinity of 11 out of 13 complexes decreases. Similarly, binding affinity computed for all the 10 wild‐type Bcl‐2 and mutated Bax complexes agreed with experimentally verified results. CONCLUSION: Several methods like PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been developed to predict cancer‐associated or deleterious mutations, but no method is available to predict apoptosis‐inducing mutations. Thus, in this study, we have examined the mutations in Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins that disrupt their binding, which is crucial for inducing apoptosis to eradicate cancer. This study suggests that protein–protein docking methods can play a significant role in the identification of hotspot mutations in Bcl‐2 or Bax that can disrupt their binding with wild‐type partner to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6825947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68259472019-11-07 Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells Raghav, Pawan Kumar Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vinod Raghava, Gajendra P. S. Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells is an important step for the successful treatment of cancer patients. Bcl‐2 is an antiapoptotic protein which determines apoptosis by interacting with proapoptotic members of the Bcl‐2 family. Exome sequencing has identified Bcl‐2 and Bax missense mutations in more than 40 cancer types. However, a little information is available about the functional impact of each Bcl‐2 and Bax mutation on the pathogenesis of cancer. METHODS: The mutational data from cancer tissues and cell lines were retrieved from the cBioPortal web resource. The 13 mutated Bcl‐2 and wild‐type Bax complexes with experimentally verified binding were identified from previous studies wherein, binding for all complexes was reportedly disrupted except one. Several protein–protein docking methods such as ClusPro, HDOCK, PatchDock, FireDock, InterEVDock2 and several mutation prediction methods such as PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been used to predict the effect of mutation to disrupt the binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax. The result obtained was compared with the known experimental data. RESULTS: The protein–protein docking method, ClusPro, employed in the present study confirmed that the binding affinity of 11 out of 13 complexes decreases. Similarly, binding affinity computed for all the 10 wild‐type Bcl‐2 and mutated Bax complexes agreed with experimentally verified results. CONCLUSION: Several methods like PolyPhen‐2, SIFT, and OncoKB have been developed to predict cancer‐associated or deleterious mutations, but no method is available to predict apoptosis‐inducing mutations. Thus, in this study, we have examined the mutations in Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins that disrupt their binding, which is crucial for inducing apoptosis to eradicate cancer. This study suggests that protein–protein docking methods can play a significant role in the identification of hotspot mutations in Bcl‐2 or Bax that can disrupt their binding with wild‐type partner to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6825947/ /pubmed/31490001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Raghav, Pawan Kumar Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vinod Raghava, Gajendra P. S. Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title | Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title_full | Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title_fullStr | Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title_short | Docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between Bcl‐2 and Bax proteins: Inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
title_sort | docking‐based approach for identification of mutations that disrupt binding between bcl‐2 and bax proteins: inducing apoptosis in cancer cells |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raghavpawankumar dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells AT kumarrajesh dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells AT kumarvinod dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells AT raghavagajendraps dockingbasedapproachforidentificationofmutationsthatdisruptbindingbetweenbcl2andbaxproteinsinducingapoptosisincancercells |