Cargando…
The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484 |
_version_ | 1783466652794355712 |
---|---|
author | Giles, Erin D. Brown, Ian L. MacLean, Paul S. Pan, Zhaoxing Melanson, Edward L. Heard, Kennon J. Cornier, Marc-Andre Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. |
author_facet | Giles, Erin D. Brown, Ian L. MacLean, Paul S. Pan, Zhaoxing Melanson, Edward L. Heard, Kennon J. Cornier, Marc-Andre Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. |
author_sort | Giles, Erin D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Eighteen healthy adults spent 24 h in a whole room indirect calorimeter to measure total energy expenditure (TEE), substrate oxidation, and postprandial metabolites in response to three diets: 1) digestible starch (DS), 2) RS (33% dietary fiber; RS), or 3) RS with high fiber (RSF, 56% fiber). The in vivo net energy content of RS and RSF are 2.74 ± 0.41 and 3.16 ± 0.27 kcal/g, respectively. There was no difference in TEE or protein oxidation between DS, RS, and RSF. However, RS and RSF consumption caused a 32% increase in fat oxidation (p = 0.04) with a concomitant 18% decrease in carbohydrate oxidation (p = 0.03) versus DS. Insulin responses were unaltered after breakfast but lower in RS and RSF after lunch, at equivalent glucose concentrations, indicating improved insulin sensitivity. The average in vivo net energy content of RS is 2.95 kcal/g, regardless of dietary fiber content. RS and RSF consumption increase fat and decrease carbohydrate oxidation with postprandial insulin responses lowered after lunch, suggesting improved insulin sensitivity at subsequent meals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6835355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68353552019-11-25 The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults Giles, Erin D. Brown, Ian L. MacLean, Paul S. Pan, Zhaoxing Melanson, Edward L. Heard, Kennon J. Cornier, Marc-Andre Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. Nutrients Article The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Eighteen healthy adults spent 24 h in a whole room indirect calorimeter to measure total energy expenditure (TEE), substrate oxidation, and postprandial metabolites in response to three diets: 1) digestible starch (DS), 2) RS (33% dietary fiber; RS), or 3) RS with high fiber (RSF, 56% fiber). The in vivo net energy content of RS and RSF are 2.74 ± 0.41 and 3.16 ± 0.27 kcal/g, respectively. There was no difference in TEE or protein oxidation between DS, RS, and RSF. However, RS and RSF consumption caused a 32% increase in fat oxidation (p = 0.04) with a concomitant 18% decrease in carbohydrate oxidation (p = 0.03) versus DS. Insulin responses were unaltered after breakfast but lower in RS and RSF after lunch, at equivalent glucose concentrations, indicating improved insulin sensitivity. The average in vivo net energy content of RS is 2.95 kcal/g, regardless of dietary fiber content. RS and RSF consumption increase fat and decrease carbohydrate oxidation with postprandial insulin responses lowered after lunch, suggesting improved insulin sensitivity at subsequent meals. MDPI 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6835355/ /pubmed/31623184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Giles, Erin D. Brown, Ian L. MacLean, Paul S. Pan, Zhaoxing Melanson, Edward L. Heard, Kennon J. Cornier, Marc-Andre Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title | The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title_full | The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title_fullStr | The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title_short | The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults |
title_sort | in vivo net energy content of resistant starch and its effect on macronutrient oxidation in healthy adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gileserind theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT brownianl theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT macleanpauls theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT panzhaoxing theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT melansonedwardl theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT heardkennonj theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT corniermarcandre theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT mardentyson theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT higginsjaninea theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT gileserind invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT brownianl invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT macleanpauls invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT panzhaoxing invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT melansonedwardl invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT heardkennonj invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT corniermarcandre invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT mardentyson invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults AT higginsjaninea invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults |