Cargando…

The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults

The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giles, Erin D., Brown, Ian L., MacLean, Paul S., Pan, Zhaoxing, Melanson, Edward L., Heard, Kennon J., Cornier, Marc-Andre, Marden, Tyson, Higgins, Janine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484
_version_ 1783466652794355712
author Giles, Erin D.
Brown, Ian L.
MacLean, Paul S.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Melanson, Edward L.
Heard, Kennon J.
Cornier, Marc-Andre
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author_facet Giles, Erin D.
Brown, Ian L.
MacLean, Paul S.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Melanson, Edward L.
Heard, Kennon J.
Cornier, Marc-Andre
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author_sort Giles, Erin D.
collection PubMed
description The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Eighteen healthy adults spent 24 h in a whole room indirect calorimeter to measure total energy expenditure (TEE), substrate oxidation, and postprandial metabolites in response to three diets: 1) digestible starch (DS), 2) RS (33% dietary fiber; RS), or 3) RS with high fiber (RSF, 56% fiber). The in vivo net energy content of RS and RSF are 2.74 ± 0.41 and 3.16 ± 0.27 kcal/g, respectively. There was no difference in TEE or protein oxidation between DS, RS, and RSF. However, RS and RSF consumption caused a 32% increase in fat oxidation (p = 0.04) with a concomitant 18% decrease in carbohydrate oxidation (p = 0.03) versus DS. Insulin responses were unaltered after breakfast but lower in RS and RSF after lunch, at equivalent glucose concentrations, indicating improved insulin sensitivity. The average in vivo net energy content of RS is 2.95 kcal/g, regardless of dietary fiber content. RS and RSF consumption increase fat and decrease carbohydrate oxidation with postprandial insulin responses lowered after lunch, suggesting improved insulin sensitivity at subsequent meals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6835355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68353552019-11-25 The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults Giles, Erin D. Brown, Ian L. MacLean, Paul S. Pan, Zhaoxing Melanson, Edward L. Heard, Kennon J. Cornier, Marc-Andre Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. Nutrients Article The in vivo net energy content of resistant starch (RS) has not been measured in humans so it has not been possible to account for the contribution of RS to dietary energy intake. We aimed to determine the in vivo net energy content of RS and examine its effect on macronutrient oxidation. This was a randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Eighteen healthy adults spent 24 h in a whole room indirect calorimeter to measure total energy expenditure (TEE), substrate oxidation, and postprandial metabolites in response to three diets: 1) digestible starch (DS), 2) RS (33% dietary fiber; RS), or 3) RS with high fiber (RSF, 56% fiber). The in vivo net energy content of RS and RSF are 2.74 ± 0.41 and 3.16 ± 0.27 kcal/g, respectively. There was no difference in TEE or protein oxidation between DS, RS, and RSF. However, RS and RSF consumption caused a 32% increase in fat oxidation (p = 0.04) with a concomitant 18% decrease in carbohydrate oxidation (p = 0.03) versus DS. Insulin responses were unaltered after breakfast but lower in RS and RSF after lunch, at equivalent glucose concentrations, indicating improved insulin sensitivity. The average in vivo net energy content of RS is 2.95 kcal/g, regardless of dietary fiber content. RS and RSF consumption increase fat and decrease carbohydrate oxidation with postprandial insulin responses lowered after lunch, suggesting improved insulin sensitivity at subsequent meals. MDPI 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6835355/ /pubmed/31623184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giles, Erin D.
Brown, Ian L.
MacLean, Paul S.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Melanson, Edward L.
Heard, Kennon J.
Cornier, Marc-Andre
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title_full The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title_fullStr The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title_full_unstemmed The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title_short The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults
title_sort in vivo net energy content of resistant starch and its effect on macronutrient oxidation in healthy adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102484
work_keys_str_mv AT gileserind theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT brownianl theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT macleanpauls theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT panzhaoxing theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT melansonedwardl theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT heardkennonj theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT corniermarcandre theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT mardentyson theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT higginsjaninea theinvivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT gileserind invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT brownianl invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT macleanpauls invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT panzhaoxing invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT melansonedwardl invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT heardkennonj invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT corniermarcandre invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT mardentyson invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults
AT higginsjaninea invivonetenergycontentofresistantstarchanditseffectonmacronutrientoxidationinhealthyadults