Cargando…

Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence

ESSENTIALS: Non‐factor VIII (FVIII) therapies for hemophilia A, such as bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), are in development. Bispecific antibodies are intrinsically different from FVIII and lack many of the same regulatory mechanisms. These differences complicate assignment and interpretation of FVIII...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leksa, Nina C., Aleman, Maria M., Goodman, Allison G., Rabinovich, Deana, Peters, Robert, Salas, Joe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14430
_version_ 1783469326827782144
author Leksa, Nina C.
Aleman, Maria M.
Goodman, Allison G.
Rabinovich, Deana
Peters, Robert
Salas, Joe
author_facet Leksa, Nina C.
Aleman, Maria M.
Goodman, Allison G.
Rabinovich, Deana
Peters, Robert
Salas, Joe
author_sort Leksa, Nina C.
collection PubMed
description ESSENTIALS: Non‐factor VIII (FVIII) therapies for hemophilia A, such as bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), are in development. Bispecific antibodies are intrinsically different from FVIII and lack many of the same regulatory mechanisms. These differences complicate assignment and interpretation of FVIII‐equivalent activity. Inability to assign FVIII equivalence compromises our capacity to assess hemostatic potential of bsAb therapies. BACKGROUND: Activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) mimetic bsAbs aim to enable prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors. With different mechanisms of action, benchmarking their activity against FVIII to determine efficacious yet safe dosage is difficult. OBJECTIVE: To compare the activities of sequence identical emicizumab (SI‐Emi) and another bsAb, BS‐027125, to recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) using clinical and nonclinical assays and to evaluate our ability to assign a FVIII‐equivalent value to bsAbs and implications thereof. METHODS: Activities of SI‐Emi, BS‐027125, and rFVIII were measured by one‐stage clotting assay, chromogenic factor Xa generation assay, and thrombin generation assay. We also assessed the activity of anti‐FIXa and anti‐FX bivalent homodimers of each bsAb and probed the effect of different reagents in thrombin generation assay (TGA). RESULTS: The FVIII‐like activity of SI‐Emi and BS‐027125 ranged greatly across each assay, varying both by parameter measured within an assay and by reagents used. Notably, SI‐Emi anti‐FIXa bivalent homodimer had meaningful activity in several assays, whereas BS‐027125 anti‐FIXa bivalent homodimer only had activity in the chromogenic assay. Surprisingly, SI‐Emi displayed activity in the absence of phospholipids, while BS‐027125 had minimal phospholipid‐independent activity. CONCLUSIONS: Bispecific antibodies demonstrate little consistency between assays tested here owing to intrinsic differences between FVIII and bsAbs. While some trends are shared, the bsAbs also differ in mechanism. These inconsistencies complicate assignment of FVIII‐equivalent values to bsAbs. Ultimately, a deeper mechanistic understanding of bsAbs as well as bsAb‐tailored assays are needed to monitor and predict their hemostatic potential and long‐term efficacy and safety confidently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6850022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68500222019-11-15 Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence Leksa, Nina C. Aleman, Maria M. Goodman, Allison G. Rabinovich, Deana Peters, Robert Salas, Joe J Thromb Haemost HAEMOSTASIS ESSENTIALS: Non‐factor VIII (FVIII) therapies for hemophilia A, such as bispecific antibodies (bsAbs), are in development. Bispecific antibodies are intrinsically different from FVIII and lack many of the same regulatory mechanisms. These differences complicate assignment and interpretation of FVIII‐equivalent activity. Inability to assign FVIII equivalence compromises our capacity to assess hemostatic potential of bsAb therapies. BACKGROUND: Activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) mimetic bsAbs aim to enable prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors. With different mechanisms of action, benchmarking their activity against FVIII to determine efficacious yet safe dosage is difficult. OBJECTIVE: To compare the activities of sequence identical emicizumab (SI‐Emi) and another bsAb, BS‐027125, to recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) using clinical and nonclinical assays and to evaluate our ability to assign a FVIII‐equivalent value to bsAbs and implications thereof. METHODS: Activities of SI‐Emi, BS‐027125, and rFVIII were measured by one‐stage clotting assay, chromogenic factor Xa generation assay, and thrombin generation assay. We also assessed the activity of anti‐FIXa and anti‐FX bivalent homodimers of each bsAb and probed the effect of different reagents in thrombin generation assay (TGA). RESULTS: The FVIII‐like activity of SI‐Emi and BS‐027125 ranged greatly across each assay, varying both by parameter measured within an assay and by reagents used. Notably, SI‐Emi anti‐FIXa bivalent homodimer had meaningful activity in several assays, whereas BS‐027125 anti‐FIXa bivalent homodimer only had activity in the chromogenic assay. Surprisingly, SI‐Emi displayed activity in the absence of phospholipids, while BS‐027125 had minimal phospholipid‐independent activity. CONCLUSIONS: Bispecific antibodies demonstrate little consistency between assays tested here owing to intrinsic differences between FVIII and bsAbs. While some trends are shared, the bsAbs also differ in mechanism. These inconsistencies complicate assignment of FVIII‐equivalent values to bsAbs. Ultimately, a deeper mechanistic understanding of bsAbs as well as bsAb‐tailored assays are needed to monitor and predict their hemostatic potential and long‐term efficacy and safety confidently. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-26 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6850022/ /pubmed/30887655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14430 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle HAEMOSTASIS
Leksa, Nina C.
Aleman, Maria M.
Goodman, Allison G.
Rabinovich, Deana
Peters, Robert
Salas, Joe
Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title_full Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title_fullStr Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title_full_unstemmed Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title_short Intrinsic differences between FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibodies and FVIII prevent assignment of FVIII‐equivalence
title_sort intrinsic differences between fviiia mimetic bispecific antibodies and fviii prevent assignment of fviii‐equivalence
topic HAEMOSTASIS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6850022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14430
work_keys_str_mv AT leksaninac intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence
AT alemanmariam intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence
AT goodmanallisong intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence
AT rabinovichdeana intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence
AT petersrobert intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence
AT salasjoe intrinsicdifferencesbetweenfviiiamimeticbispecificantibodiesandfviiipreventassignmentoffviiiequivalence