Cargando…

The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latella, Christopher, Teo, Wei-Peng, Drinkwater, Eric J., Kendall, Kristina, Haff, G. Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z
_version_ 1783469597451616256
author Latella, Christopher
Teo, Wei-Peng
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Kendall, Kristina
Haff, G. Gregory
author_facet Latella, Christopher
Teo, Wei-Peng
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Kendall, Kristina
Haff, G. Gregory
author_sort Latella, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of a single session of CSs to attenuate losses in force, velocity and power compared to traditional set (TS) training. METHODS: Screening consisted of a systematic search of EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Inclusion criteria were (1) measured one or more of mean/peak force, velocity or power; (2) implemented CSs in comparison to TSs; (3) an acute design, or part thereof; and (4) published in an English-language, peer-reviewed journal. Raw data (mean ± standard deviation) were extracted from included studies and converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were used to calculate SMD ± 95% CI. Peak (SMD = 0.815, 95% CI 0.105–1.524, p = 0.024) and mean (SMD = 0.863, 95% CI 0.319–1.406, p = 0.002) velocity, peak (SMD = 0.356, 95% CI 0.057–0.655, p = 0.019) and mean (SMD = 0.692, 95% CI 0.395–0.990, p < 0.001) power, and peak force (SMD = 0.306, 95% CI − 0.028 to 0.584, p = 0.031) favoured CS. Subgroup analyses demonstrated an overall effect for CS across loads (SMD = 0.702, 95% CI 0.548–0.856, p < 0.001), included exercises (SMD = 0.664, 95% CI 0.413–0.916, p < 0.001), experience levels (SMD = 0.790, 95% CI 0.500–1.080, p < 0.001) and CS structures (SMD = 0.731, 95% CI 0.567–0.894, p < 0.001) with no difference within subgroups. CONCLUSION: CSs are a useful strategy to attenuate the loss in velocity, power and peak force during RT and should be used to maintain neuromuscular performance, especially when kinetic outcomes are emphasised. However, it remains unclear if the benefits translate to improved performance across all RT exercises, between sexes and across the lifespan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6851217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68512172019-12-03 The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Latella, Christopher Teo, Wei-Peng Drinkwater, Eric J. Kendall, Kristina Haff, G. Gregory Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of a single session of CSs to attenuate losses in force, velocity and power compared to traditional set (TS) training. METHODS: Screening consisted of a systematic search of EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Inclusion criteria were (1) measured one or more of mean/peak force, velocity or power; (2) implemented CSs in comparison to TSs; (3) an acute design, or part thereof; and (4) published in an English-language, peer-reviewed journal. Raw data (mean ± standard deviation) were extracted from included studies and converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were used to calculate SMD ± 95% CI. Peak (SMD = 0.815, 95% CI 0.105–1.524, p = 0.024) and mean (SMD = 0.863, 95% CI 0.319–1.406, p = 0.002) velocity, peak (SMD = 0.356, 95% CI 0.057–0.655, p = 0.019) and mean (SMD = 0.692, 95% CI 0.395–0.990, p < 0.001) power, and peak force (SMD = 0.306, 95% CI − 0.028 to 0.584, p = 0.031) favoured CS. Subgroup analyses demonstrated an overall effect for CS across loads (SMD = 0.702, 95% CI 0.548–0.856, p < 0.001), included exercises (SMD = 0.664, 95% CI 0.413–0.916, p < 0.001), experience levels (SMD = 0.790, 95% CI 0.500–1.080, p < 0.001) and CS structures (SMD = 0.731, 95% CI 0.567–0.894, p < 0.001) with no difference within subgroups. CONCLUSION: CSs are a useful strategy to attenuate the loss in velocity, power and peak force during RT and should be used to maintain neuromuscular performance, especially when kinetic outcomes are emphasised. However, it remains unclear if the benefits translate to improved performance across all RT exercises, between sexes and across the lifespan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6851217/ /pubmed/31506904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Latella, Christopher
Teo, Wei-Peng
Drinkwater, Eric J.
Kendall, Kristina
Haff, G. Gregory
The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort acute neuromuscular responses to cluster set resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z
work_keys_str_mv AT latellachristopher theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT teoweipeng theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT drinkwaterericj theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kendallkristina theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haffggregory theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT latellachristopher acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT teoweipeng acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT drinkwaterericj acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kendallkristina acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haffggregory acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis