Cargando…
The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z |
_version_ | 1783469597451616256 |
---|---|
author | Latella, Christopher Teo, Wei-Peng Drinkwater, Eric J. Kendall, Kristina Haff, G. Gregory |
author_facet | Latella, Christopher Teo, Wei-Peng Drinkwater, Eric J. Kendall, Kristina Haff, G. Gregory |
author_sort | Latella, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of a single session of CSs to attenuate losses in force, velocity and power compared to traditional set (TS) training. METHODS: Screening consisted of a systematic search of EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Inclusion criteria were (1) measured one or more of mean/peak force, velocity or power; (2) implemented CSs in comparison to TSs; (3) an acute design, or part thereof; and (4) published in an English-language, peer-reviewed journal. Raw data (mean ± standard deviation) were extracted from included studies and converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were used to calculate SMD ± 95% CI. Peak (SMD = 0.815, 95% CI 0.105–1.524, p = 0.024) and mean (SMD = 0.863, 95% CI 0.319–1.406, p = 0.002) velocity, peak (SMD = 0.356, 95% CI 0.057–0.655, p = 0.019) and mean (SMD = 0.692, 95% CI 0.395–0.990, p < 0.001) power, and peak force (SMD = 0.306, 95% CI − 0.028 to 0.584, p = 0.031) favoured CS. Subgroup analyses demonstrated an overall effect for CS across loads (SMD = 0.702, 95% CI 0.548–0.856, p < 0.001), included exercises (SMD = 0.664, 95% CI 0.413–0.916, p < 0.001), experience levels (SMD = 0.790, 95% CI 0.500–1.080, p < 0.001) and CS structures (SMD = 0.731, 95% CI 0.567–0.894, p < 0.001) with no difference within subgroups. CONCLUSION: CSs are a useful strategy to attenuate the loss in velocity, power and peak force during RT and should be used to maintain neuromuscular performance, especially when kinetic outcomes are emphasised. However, it remains unclear if the benefits translate to improved performance across all RT exercises, between sexes and across the lifespan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6851217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68512172019-12-03 The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Latella, Christopher Teo, Wei-Peng Drinkwater, Eric J. Kendall, Kristina Haff, G. Gregory Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Cluster sets (CSs) are a popular resistance training (RT) strategy categorised by short rest periods implemented between single or groups of repetitions. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of CSs on acute intra-session neuromuscular performance is still equivocal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of a single session of CSs to attenuate losses in force, velocity and power compared to traditional set (TS) training. METHODS: Screening consisted of a systematic search of EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Inclusion criteria were (1) measured one or more of mean/peak force, velocity or power; (2) implemented CSs in comparison to TSs; (3) an acute design, or part thereof; and (4) published in an English-language, peer-reviewed journal. Raw data (mean ± standard deviation) were extracted from included studies and converted into standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were used to calculate SMD ± 95% CI. Peak (SMD = 0.815, 95% CI 0.105–1.524, p = 0.024) and mean (SMD = 0.863, 95% CI 0.319–1.406, p = 0.002) velocity, peak (SMD = 0.356, 95% CI 0.057–0.655, p = 0.019) and mean (SMD = 0.692, 95% CI 0.395–0.990, p < 0.001) power, and peak force (SMD = 0.306, 95% CI − 0.028 to 0.584, p = 0.031) favoured CS. Subgroup analyses demonstrated an overall effect for CS across loads (SMD = 0.702, 95% CI 0.548–0.856, p < 0.001), included exercises (SMD = 0.664, 95% CI 0.413–0.916, p < 0.001), experience levels (SMD = 0.790, 95% CI 0.500–1.080, p < 0.001) and CS structures (SMD = 0.731, 95% CI 0.567–0.894, p < 0.001) with no difference within subgroups. CONCLUSION: CSs are a useful strategy to attenuate the loss in velocity, power and peak force during RT and should be used to maintain neuromuscular performance, especially when kinetic outcomes are emphasised. However, it remains unclear if the benefits translate to improved performance across all RT exercises, between sexes and across the lifespan. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-11 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6851217/ /pubmed/31506904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Latella, Christopher Teo, Wei-Peng Drinkwater, Eric J. Kendall, Kristina Haff, G. Gregory The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Acute Neuromuscular Responses to Cluster Set Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | acute neuromuscular responses to cluster set resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01172-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT latellachristopher theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT teoweipeng theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT drinkwaterericj theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kendallkristina theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haffggregory theacuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT latellachristopher acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT teoweipeng acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT drinkwaterericj acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kendallkristina acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haffggregory acuteneuromuscularresponsestoclustersetresistancetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |