Cargando…
Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability
Microbes in indoor environments are constantly being exposed to antimicrobial surface finishes. Many are rendered non‐viable after spending extended periods of time under low‐moisture, low‐nutrient surface conditions, regardless of whether those surfaces have been amended with antimicrobial chemical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30980566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12558 |
_version_ | 1783469704251179008 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Jinglin Ben Maamar, Sarah Glawe, Adam J. Gottel, Neil Gilbert, Jack A. Hartmann, Erica M. |
author_facet | Hu, Jinglin Ben Maamar, Sarah Glawe, Adam J. Gottel, Neil Gilbert, Jack A. Hartmann, Erica M. |
author_sort | Hu, Jinglin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microbes in indoor environments are constantly being exposed to antimicrobial surface finishes. Many are rendered non‐viable after spending extended periods of time under low‐moisture, low‐nutrient surface conditions, regardless of whether those surfaces have been amended with antimicrobial chemicals. However, some microorganisms remain viable even after prolonged exposure to these hostile conditions. Work with specific model pathogens makes it difficult to draw general conclusions about how chemical and physical properties of surfaces affect microbes. Here, we explore the survival of a synthetic community of non‐model microorganisms isolated from built environments following exposure to three chemically and physically distinct surface finishes. Our findings demonstrated the differences in bacterial survival associated with three chemically and physically distinct materials. Alkaline clay surfaces select for an alkaliphilic bacterium, Kocuria rosea, whereas acidic mold‐resistant paint favors Bacillus timonensis, a Gram‐negative spore‐forming bacterium that also survives on antimicrobial surfaces after 24 hours of exposure. Additionally, antibiotic‐resistant Pantoea allii did not exhibit prolonged retention on antimicrobial surfaces. Our controlled microcosm experiment integrates measurement of indoor chemistry and microbiology to elucidate the complex biochemical interactions that influence the indoor microbiome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6851865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68518652019-11-18 Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability Hu, Jinglin Ben Maamar, Sarah Glawe, Adam J. Gottel, Neil Gilbert, Jack A. Hartmann, Erica M. Indoor Air Original Articles Microbes in indoor environments are constantly being exposed to antimicrobial surface finishes. Many are rendered non‐viable after spending extended periods of time under low‐moisture, low‐nutrient surface conditions, regardless of whether those surfaces have been amended with antimicrobial chemicals. However, some microorganisms remain viable even after prolonged exposure to these hostile conditions. Work with specific model pathogens makes it difficult to draw general conclusions about how chemical and physical properties of surfaces affect microbes. Here, we explore the survival of a synthetic community of non‐model microorganisms isolated from built environments following exposure to three chemically and physically distinct surface finishes. Our findings demonstrated the differences in bacterial survival associated with three chemically and physically distinct materials. Alkaline clay surfaces select for an alkaliphilic bacterium, Kocuria rosea, whereas acidic mold‐resistant paint favors Bacillus timonensis, a Gram‐negative spore‐forming bacterium that also survives on antimicrobial surfaces after 24 hours of exposure. Additionally, antibiotic‐resistant Pantoea allii did not exhibit prolonged retention on antimicrobial surfaces. Our controlled microcosm experiment integrates measurement of indoor chemistry and microbiology to elucidate the complex biochemical interactions that influence the indoor microbiome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-13 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6851865/ /pubmed/30980566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12558 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Indoor Air published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hu, Jinglin Ben Maamar, Sarah Glawe, Adam J. Gottel, Neil Gilbert, Jack A. Hartmann, Erica M. Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title | Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title_full | Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title_fullStr | Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title_short | Impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
title_sort | impacts of indoor surface finishes on bacterial viability |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6851865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30980566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujinglin impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability AT benmaamarsarah impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability AT glaweadamj impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability AT gottelneil impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability AT gilbertjacka impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability AT hartmannericam impactsofindoorsurfacefinishesonbacterialviability |