Cargando…

The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation

BACKGROUND: Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Sidney H., Elgin, Sarah C. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0314-5
_version_ 1783469948527443968
author Wang, Sidney H.
Elgin, Sarah C. R.
author_facet Wang, Sidney H.
Elgin, Sarah C. R.
author_sort Wang, Sidney H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. RESULTS: Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6852933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68529332019-11-20 The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation Wang, Sidney H. Elgin, Sarah C. R. Epigenetics Chromatin Research BACKGROUND: Chromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model. RESULTS: Using selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation. BioMed Central 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6852933/ /pubmed/31722719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0314-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Sidney H.
Elgin, Sarah C. R.
The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title_full The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title_fullStr The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title_short The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
title_sort impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6852933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0314-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsidneyh theimpactofgeneticbackgroundandcelllineageonthelevelandpatternofgeneexpressioninpositioneffectvariegation
AT elginsarahcr theimpactofgeneticbackgroundandcelllineageonthelevelandpatternofgeneexpressioninpositioneffectvariegation
AT wangsidneyh impactofgeneticbackgroundandcelllineageonthelevelandpatternofgeneexpressioninpositioneffectvariegation
AT elginsarahcr impactofgeneticbackgroundandcelllineageonthelevelandpatternofgeneexpressioninpositioneffectvariegation