Cargando…
Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae memb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609012 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056 |
_version_ | 1783470604863668224 |
---|---|
author | Wolf, Dane M Segawa, Mayuko Kondadi, Arun Kumar Anand, Ruchika Bailey, Sean T Reichert, Andreas S van der Bliek, Alexander M Shackelford, David B Liesa, Marc Shirihai, Orian S |
author_facet | Wolf, Dane M Segawa, Mayuko Kondadi, Arun Kumar Anand, Ruchika Bailey, Sean T Reichert, Andreas S van der Bliek, Alexander M Shackelford, David B Liesa, Marc Shirihai, Orian S |
author_sort | Wolf, Dane M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae membranes necessitates a re‐examination of the equipotential representation of the IMM. We developed an approach to monitor ΔΨ(m) at the resolution of individual cristae. We found that the IMM was divided into segments with distinct ΔΨ(m), corresponding to cristae and IBM. ΔΨ(m) was higher at cristae compared to IBM. Treatment with oligomycin increased, whereas FCCP decreased, ΔΨ(m) heterogeneity along the IMM. Impairment of cristae structure through deletion of MICOS‐complex components or Opa1 diminished this intramitochondrial heterogeneity of ΔΨ(m). Lastly, we determined that different cristae within the individual mitochondrion can have disparate membrane potentials and that interventions causing acute depolarization may affect some cristae while sparing others. Altogether, our data support a new model in which cristae within the same mitochondrion behave as independent bioenergetic units, preventing the failure of specific cristae from spreading dysfunction to the rest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6856616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68566162019-11-21 Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent Wolf, Dane M Segawa, Mayuko Kondadi, Arun Kumar Anand, Ruchika Bailey, Sean T Reichert, Andreas S van der Bliek, Alexander M Shackelford, David B Liesa, Marc Shirihai, Orian S EMBO J Articles The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae membranes necessitates a re‐examination of the equipotential representation of the IMM. We developed an approach to monitor ΔΨ(m) at the resolution of individual cristae. We found that the IMM was divided into segments with distinct ΔΨ(m), corresponding to cristae and IBM. ΔΨ(m) was higher at cristae compared to IBM. Treatment with oligomycin increased, whereas FCCP decreased, ΔΨ(m) heterogeneity along the IMM. Impairment of cristae structure through deletion of MICOS‐complex components or Opa1 diminished this intramitochondrial heterogeneity of ΔΨ(m). Lastly, we determined that different cristae within the individual mitochondrion can have disparate membrane potentials and that interventions causing acute depolarization may affect some cristae while sparing others. Altogether, our data support a new model in which cristae within the same mitochondrion behave as independent bioenergetic units, preventing the failure of specific cristae from spreading dysfunction to the rest. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-14 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6856616/ /pubmed/31609012 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Wolf, Dane M Segawa, Mayuko Kondadi, Arun Kumar Anand, Ruchika Bailey, Sean T Reichert, Andreas S van der Bliek, Alexander M Shackelford, David B Liesa, Marc Shirihai, Orian S Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title | Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title_full | Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title_fullStr | Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title_short | Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
title_sort | individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609012 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolfdanem individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT segawamayuko individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT kondadiarunkumar individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT anandruchika individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT baileyseant individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT reichertandreass individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT vanderbliekalexanderm individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT shackelforddavidb individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT liesamarc individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent AT shirihaiorians individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent |