Cargando…

Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent

The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae memb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolf, Dane M, Segawa, Mayuko, Kondadi, Arun Kumar, Anand, Ruchika, Bailey, Sean T, Reichert, Andreas S, van der Bliek, Alexander M, Shackelford, David B, Liesa, Marc, Shirihai, Orian S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609012
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056
_version_ 1783470604863668224
author Wolf, Dane M
Segawa, Mayuko
Kondadi, Arun Kumar
Anand, Ruchika
Bailey, Sean T
Reichert, Andreas S
van der Bliek, Alexander M
Shackelford, David B
Liesa, Marc
Shirihai, Orian S
author_facet Wolf, Dane M
Segawa, Mayuko
Kondadi, Arun Kumar
Anand, Ruchika
Bailey, Sean T
Reichert, Andreas S
van der Bliek, Alexander M
Shackelford, David B
Liesa, Marc
Shirihai, Orian S
author_sort Wolf, Dane M
collection PubMed
description The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae membranes necessitates a re‐examination of the equipotential representation of the IMM. We developed an approach to monitor ΔΨ(m) at the resolution of individual cristae. We found that the IMM was divided into segments with distinct ΔΨ(m), corresponding to cristae and IBM. ΔΨ(m) was higher at cristae compared to IBM. Treatment with oligomycin increased, whereas FCCP decreased, ΔΨ(m) heterogeneity along the IMM. Impairment of cristae structure through deletion of MICOS‐complex components or Opa1 diminished this intramitochondrial heterogeneity of ΔΨ(m). Lastly, we determined that different cristae within the individual mitochondrion can have disparate membrane potentials and that interventions causing acute depolarization may affect some cristae while sparing others. Altogether, our data support a new model in which cristae within the same mitochondrion behave as independent bioenergetic units, preventing the failure of specific cristae from spreading dysfunction to the rest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6856616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68566162019-11-21 Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent Wolf, Dane M Segawa, Mayuko Kondadi, Arun Kumar Anand, Ruchika Bailey, Sean T Reichert, Andreas S van der Bliek, Alexander M Shackelford, David B Liesa, Marc Shirihai, Orian S EMBO J Articles The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ(m)) is the main driver of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). The inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM), consisting of cristae and inner boundary membranes (IBM), is considered to carry a uniform ΔΨ(m). However, sequestration of OXPHOS components in cristae membranes necessitates a re‐examination of the equipotential representation of the IMM. We developed an approach to monitor ΔΨ(m) at the resolution of individual cristae. We found that the IMM was divided into segments with distinct ΔΨ(m), corresponding to cristae and IBM. ΔΨ(m) was higher at cristae compared to IBM. Treatment with oligomycin increased, whereas FCCP decreased, ΔΨ(m) heterogeneity along the IMM. Impairment of cristae structure through deletion of MICOS‐complex components or Opa1 diminished this intramitochondrial heterogeneity of ΔΨ(m). Lastly, we determined that different cristae within the individual mitochondrion can have disparate membrane potentials and that interventions causing acute depolarization may affect some cristae while sparing others. Altogether, our data support a new model in which cristae within the same mitochondrion behave as independent bioenergetic units, preventing the failure of specific cristae from spreading dysfunction to the rest. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-14 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6856616/ /pubmed/31609012 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Wolf, Dane M
Segawa, Mayuko
Kondadi, Arun Kumar
Anand, Ruchika
Bailey, Sean T
Reichert, Andreas S
van der Bliek, Alexander M
Shackelford, David B
Liesa, Marc
Shirihai, Orian S
Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title_full Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title_fullStr Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title_full_unstemmed Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title_short Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
title_sort individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6856616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31609012
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018101056
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfdanem individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT segawamayuko individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT kondadiarunkumar individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT anandruchika individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT baileyseant individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT reichertandreass individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT vanderbliekalexanderm individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT shackelforddavidb individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT liesamarc individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent
AT shirihaiorians individualcristaewithinthesamemitochondriondisplaydifferentmembranepotentialsandarefunctionallyindependent