Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of health interventions are increasingly incorporating evidence outside of randomized controlled trials (RCT). While non-randomized study (NRS) types may be more prone to bias compared to RCT, the tools used to evaluate risk of bias (RoB) in NRS are less straightforwar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrah, Kelly, Young, Kelsey, Tunis, Matthew C., Zhao, Linlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1172-8

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1172-8

Ejemplares similares