Cargando…

Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The neuromuscular decline impact in the functional independence of older women is determining the necessity of implementing new strategies focused on core strength training and postural stability maintenance to promote healthy aging. OBJECTIVES: To define whether Pilates or resistance tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrasco-Poyatos, María, Ramos-Campo, Domingo J., Rubio-Arias, Jacobo A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741786
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7948
_version_ 1783471056754835456
author Carrasco-Poyatos, María
Ramos-Campo, Domingo J.
Rubio-Arias, Jacobo A.
author_facet Carrasco-Poyatos, María
Ramos-Campo, Domingo J.
Rubio-Arias, Jacobo A.
author_sort Carrasco-Poyatos, María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The neuromuscular decline impact in the functional independence of older women is determining the necessity of implementing new strategies focused on core strength training and postural stability maintenance to promote healthy aging. OBJECTIVES: To define whether Pilates or resistance training is better at improving (a) core isometric and isokinetic muscular strength, and (b) static and dynamic balance, in older women. METHODS: This was a cluster randomized controlled trial. Physically independent older women (60–80 years) from day centers were randomly allocated to Pilates, Muscular and Control Groups (PG, MG and CG) using a block randomization method. Only the research staff performing the assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Exercise groups trained twice a week (1 h per session) for 18 weeks in a moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Core strength (primary outcome): trunk and hip isometric and hip isokinetic muscular strength (Biodex System III Pro Isokinetic Dynamometer), alongside one leg static balance (portable force platform Kistler 9286AA) and dynamic balance (timed up and go (TUG)) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 60 participants were randomized (PG, n = 20; MG, n = 20; CG, n = 20) and 49 completed the trial (PG, n = 16; MG, n = 19; CG, n = 14). Regarding hip isometric extension strength, PG was statistically better than CG (P = 0.004). There were no differences between groups regarding isokinetic strength or balance. Intra-group comparisons showed significant improvements (P < 0.05) in the dynamic balance and trunk and hip isometric extension strength for PG and MG, whereas every hip isokinetic measurement was improved in MG. Exercise programs did not produce any adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: The Pilates training program was more effective for improving isometric hip and trunk extension strength, while the Muscular training program generated greater benefits on trunk and hip isokinetic strength. Moreover, both training programs showed moderate effects for the TUG. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02506491).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6859004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68590042019-11-18 Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial Carrasco-Poyatos, María Ramos-Campo, Domingo J. Rubio-Arias, Jacobo A. PeerJ Geriatrics BACKGROUND: The neuromuscular decline impact in the functional independence of older women is determining the necessity of implementing new strategies focused on core strength training and postural stability maintenance to promote healthy aging. OBJECTIVES: To define whether Pilates or resistance training is better at improving (a) core isometric and isokinetic muscular strength, and (b) static and dynamic balance, in older women. METHODS: This was a cluster randomized controlled trial. Physically independent older women (60–80 years) from day centers were randomly allocated to Pilates, Muscular and Control Groups (PG, MG and CG) using a block randomization method. Only the research staff performing the assessment and statistical analysis were blinded. Exercise groups trained twice a week (1 h per session) for 18 weeks in a moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Core strength (primary outcome): trunk and hip isometric and hip isokinetic muscular strength (Biodex System III Pro Isokinetic Dynamometer), alongside one leg static balance (portable force platform Kistler 9286AA) and dynamic balance (timed up and go (TUG)) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 60 participants were randomized (PG, n = 20; MG, n = 20; CG, n = 20) and 49 completed the trial (PG, n = 16; MG, n = 19; CG, n = 14). Regarding hip isometric extension strength, PG was statistically better than CG (P = 0.004). There were no differences between groups regarding isokinetic strength or balance. Intra-group comparisons showed significant improvements (P < 0.05) in the dynamic balance and trunk and hip isometric extension strength for PG and MG, whereas every hip isokinetic measurement was improved in MG. Exercise programs did not produce any adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: The Pilates training program was more effective for improving isometric hip and trunk extension strength, while the Muscular training program generated greater benefits on trunk and hip isokinetic strength. Moreover, both training programs showed moderate effects for the TUG. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02506491). PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6859004/ /pubmed/31741786 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7948 Text en © 2019 Carrasco-Poyatos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Geriatrics
Carrasco-Poyatos, María
Ramos-Campo, Domingo J.
Rubio-Arias, Jacobo A.
Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort pilates versus resistance training on trunk strength and balance adaptations in older women: a randomized controlled trial
topic Geriatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741786
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7948
work_keys_str_mv AT carrascopoyatosmaria pilatesversusresistancetrainingontrunkstrengthandbalanceadaptationsinolderwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramoscampodomingoj pilatesversusresistancetrainingontrunkstrengthandbalanceadaptationsinolderwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rubioariasjacoboa pilatesversusresistancetrainingontrunkstrengthandbalanceadaptationsinolderwomenarandomizedcontrolledtrial