Cargando…
Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue”
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31738729 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.8.44853 |
| _version_ | 1783471224996757504 |
|---|---|
| author | McCoy, C. Eric |
| author_facet | McCoy, C. Eric |
| author_sort | McCoy, C. Eric |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-6860379 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-68603792019-11-25 Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” McCoy, C. Eric West J Emerg Med Response to Letter to the Editor Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-11 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6860379/ /pubmed/31738729 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.8.44853 Text en Copyright: © 2019 McCoy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| spellingShingle | Response to Letter to the Editor McCoy, C. Eric Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title | Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title_full | Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title_fullStr | Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title_full_unstemmed | Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title_short | Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue” |
| title_sort | author response to: “randomized controlled trial of simulation vs standard training for teaching medical students high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the methodological issue” |
| topic | Response to Letter to the Editor |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31738729 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.8.44853 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mccoyceric authorresponsetorandomizedcontrolledtrialofsimulationvsstandardtrainingforteachingmedicalstudentshighqualitycardiopulmonaryresuscitationthemethodologicalissue |