Cargando…
Author Response to: “Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue”
Autor principal: | McCoy, C. Eric |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31738729 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.8.44853 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs. Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
por: McCoy, C. Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation vs Standard Training for Teaching Medical Students High-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Methodological Issue
por: Rad, Reza Farahmand, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Indian resuscitation council cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines: The way ahead!
por: Kapoor, Mukul C, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Nephropathy in Diabetic Patients Attending an Outpatients Clinic in Harare, Zimbabwe: Methodological Issues
por: Machingura, Pasipanodya Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
In vivo Simulation-Based Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students: Teaching and Assessment [Response to Letter]
por: Sideris, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2021)