Cargando…
Commonly used estimates of the genetic contribution to disease are subject to the same fallacies as bad luck estimates
The scientific debate following the initial formulation of the “bad luck” hypothesis in cancer development highlighted how measures based on analysis of variance are inappropriately used for risk communication. The notion of “explained” variance is not only used to quantify randomness, but also to q...
Autores principales: | Björk, Jonas, Andersson, Tomas, Ahlbom, Anders |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31641918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00573-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Strategies to Prevent “Bad Luck” in Cancer
por: Albini, Adriana, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Language evolution and complexity considerations: The no half-Merge fallacy
por: Martins, Pedro Tiago, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Inequality in genetic cancer risk suggests bad genes rather than bad luck
por: Stensrud, Mats Julius, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Conservation resource allocation, small population resiliency, and the fallacy of conservation triage
por: Wiedenfeld, David A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Molar and nonmolar triploidy: Recurrence or bad luck
por: Robinson, Brianne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)