Cargando…
Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in genome editing have facilitated the direct manipulation of not only the genome, but also the epigenome. Genome editing is typically performed by introducing a single CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-strand break (DSB), followed by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)- or homol...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0711-z |
_version_ | 1783471625421717504 |
---|---|
author | Alexander, Jes Findlay, Gregory M. Kircher, Martin Shendure, Jay |
author_facet | Alexander, Jes Findlay, Gregory M. Kircher, Martin Shendure, Jay |
author_sort | Alexander, Jes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent advances in genome editing have facilitated the direct manipulation of not only the genome, but also the epigenome. Genome editing is typically performed by introducing a single CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-strand break (DSB), followed by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)- or homology-directed repair-mediated repair. Epigenome editing, and in particular methylation of CpG dinucleotides, can be performed using catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused to a methyltransferase domain. However, for investigations of the role of methylation in gene silencing, studies based on dCas9-methyltransferase have limited resolution and are potentially confounded by the effects of binding of the fusion protein. As an alternative strategy for epigenome editing, we tested CRISPR/Cas9 dual cutting of the genome in the presence of in vitro methylated exogenous DNA, with the aim of driving replacement of the DNA sequence intervening the dual cuts via NHEJ. RESULTS: In a proof of concept at the HPRT1 promoter, successful replacement events with heavily methylated alleles of a CpG island resulted in functional silencing of the HPRT1 gene. Although still limited in efficiency, our study demonstrates concurrent epigenome and genome editing in a single event. CONCLUSIONS: This study opens the door to investigations of the functional consequences of methylation patterns at single CpG dinucleotide resolution. Our results furthermore support the conclusion that promoter methylation is sufficient to functionally silence gene expression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6862751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68627512019-12-11 Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement Alexander, Jes Findlay, Gregory M. Kircher, Martin Shendure, Jay BMC Biol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Recent advances in genome editing have facilitated the direct manipulation of not only the genome, but also the epigenome. Genome editing is typically performed by introducing a single CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-strand break (DSB), followed by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)- or homology-directed repair-mediated repair. Epigenome editing, and in particular methylation of CpG dinucleotides, can be performed using catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused to a methyltransferase domain. However, for investigations of the role of methylation in gene silencing, studies based on dCas9-methyltransferase have limited resolution and are potentially confounded by the effects of binding of the fusion protein. As an alternative strategy for epigenome editing, we tested CRISPR/Cas9 dual cutting of the genome in the presence of in vitro methylated exogenous DNA, with the aim of driving replacement of the DNA sequence intervening the dual cuts via NHEJ. RESULTS: In a proof of concept at the HPRT1 promoter, successful replacement events with heavily methylated alleles of a CpG island resulted in functional silencing of the HPRT1 gene. Although still limited in efficiency, our study demonstrates concurrent epigenome and genome editing in a single event. CONCLUSIONS: This study opens the door to investigations of the functional consequences of methylation patterns at single CpG dinucleotide resolution. Our results furthermore support the conclusion that promoter methylation is sufficient to functionally silence gene expression. BioMed Central 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6862751/ /pubmed/31739790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0711-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Alexander, Jes Findlay, Gregory M. Kircher, Martin Shendure, Jay Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title | Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title_full | Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title_fullStr | Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title_short | Concurrent genome and epigenome editing by CRISPR-mediated sequence replacement |
title_sort | concurrent genome and epigenome editing by crispr-mediated sequence replacement |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0711-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexanderjes concurrentgenomeandepigenomeeditingbycrisprmediatedsequencereplacement AT findlaygregorym concurrentgenomeandepigenomeeditingbycrisprmediatedsequencereplacement AT kirchermartin concurrentgenomeandepigenomeeditingbycrisprmediatedsequencereplacement AT shendurejay concurrentgenomeandepigenomeeditingbycrisprmediatedsequencereplacement |