Cargando…

Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue

BACKGROUND: Foam roller and vibration techniques are currently used to assist in recovery after fatigue. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the use of a foam roller with and without vibration on dynamic balance, ankle dorsiflexion, hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Benito, Ana María, Valldecabres, Raúl, Ceca, Diego, Richards, Jim, Barrachina Igual, Joaquín, Pablos, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788353
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8000
_version_ 1783474478711308288
author de Benito, Ana María
Valldecabres, Raúl
Ceca, Diego
Richards, Jim
Barrachina Igual, Joaquín
Pablos, Ana
author_facet de Benito, Ana María
Valldecabres, Raúl
Ceca, Diego
Richards, Jim
Barrachina Igual, Joaquín
Pablos, Ana
author_sort de Benito, Ana María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foam roller and vibration techniques are currently used to assist in recovery after fatigue. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the use of a foam roller with and without vibration on dynamic balance, ankle dorsiflexion, hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility and perceived knee and ankle stability after an induced fatigue protocol. METHODS: A total of 24 healthy recreationally active participants (17 males and seven females) were recruited to a randomized cross over trial consisting of; no treatment (NT), foam roller treatment (FR) and vibration foam roller treatment (VFR). The assessments included; the Sit & Reach test, Y balance test and post-treatment perceived knee and ankle stability. Measurements were taken after a standardized warm up (baseline) and repeated following an exercise-induced muscle fatigue protocol consisting of repeated lunges until volitional fatigue. The three treatment conditions were assessed on three separate days in a randomized order. A 3 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA was used to investigate differences between the three treatments over the three time points and a one factor repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine any differences between treatments using the Global Rate of Change scale when considering perceived stability. RESULTS: FR and VFR conditions both showed a greater ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) (p < 0.001), greater posteromedial and posterolateral reach distances (p < 0.001) and a better knee and ankle perceived stability (p < 0.001) when compared to the NT condition. A trend toward significance was observed in the hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility (p = 0.074) in both treatment conditions when compared to the NT condition. However, no differences were seen between the FR and VFR conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Both FR conditions seem to assist in exercise-induced muscle fatigue recovery with improvements in ROM, balance and perceived stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6883953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68839532019-11-29 Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue de Benito, Ana María Valldecabres, Raúl Ceca, Diego Richards, Jim Barrachina Igual, Joaquín Pablos, Ana PeerJ Kinesiology BACKGROUND: Foam roller and vibration techniques are currently used to assist in recovery after fatigue. The main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the use of a foam roller with and without vibration on dynamic balance, ankle dorsiflexion, hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility and perceived knee and ankle stability after an induced fatigue protocol. METHODS: A total of 24 healthy recreationally active participants (17 males and seven females) were recruited to a randomized cross over trial consisting of; no treatment (NT), foam roller treatment (FR) and vibration foam roller treatment (VFR). The assessments included; the Sit & Reach test, Y balance test and post-treatment perceived knee and ankle stability. Measurements were taken after a standardized warm up (baseline) and repeated following an exercise-induced muscle fatigue protocol consisting of repeated lunges until volitional fatigue. The three treatment conditions were assessed on three separate days in a randomized order. A 3 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA was used to investigate differences between the three treatments over the three time points and a one factor repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine any differences between treatments using the Global Rate of Change scale when considering perceived stability. RESULTS: FR and VFR conditions both showed a greater ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) (p < 0.001), greater posteromedial and posterolateral reach distances (p < 0.001) and a better knee and ankle perceived stability (p < 0.001) when compared to the NT condition. A trend toward significance was observed in the hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility (p = 0.074) in both treatment conditions when compared to the NT condition. However, no differences were seen between the FR and VFR conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Both FR conditions seem to assist in exercise-induced muscle fatigue recovery with improvements in ROM, balance and perceived stability. PeerJ Inc. 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6883953/ /pubmed/31788353 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8000 Text en © 2019 de Benito et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Kinesiology
de Benito, Ana María
Valldecabres, Raúl
Ceca, Diego
Richards, Jim
Barrachina Igual, Joaquín
Pablos, Ana
Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title_full Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title_fullStr Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title_full_unstemmed Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title_short Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
title_sort effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue
topic Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6883953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788353
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8000
work_keys_str_mv AT debenitoanamaria effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue
AT valldecabresraul effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue
AT cecadiego effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue
AT richardsjim effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue
AT barrachinaigualjoaquin effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue
AT pablosana effectofvibrationvsnonvibrationfoamrollingtechniquesonflexibilitydynamicbalanceandperceivedjointstabilityafterfatigue