Cargando…
Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation
The Netherlands Nutrition Centre has developed ‘Guidelines for Healthier Canteens’. To facilitate their implementation, implementation tools were developed: stakeholders’ questionnaires, the ‘Canteen Scan’ (an online tool to assess product availability/accessibility), a tailored advisory meeting/rep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31731619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224509 |
_version_ | 1783475119235006464 |
---|---|
author | Evenhuis, Irma J. Vyth, Ellis L. Veldhuis, Lydian Jacobs, Suzanne M. Seidell, Jacob C. Renders, Carry M. |
author_facet | Evenhuis, Irma J. Vyth, Ellis L. Veldhuis, Lydian Jacobs, Suzanne M. Seidell, Jacob C. Renders, Carry M. |
author_sort | Evenhuis, Irma J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Netherlands Nutrition Centre has developed ‘Guidelines for Healthier Canteens’. To facilitate their implementation, implementation tools were developed: stakeholders’ questionnaires, the ‘Canteen Scan’ (an online tool to assess product availability/accessibility), a tailored advisory meeting/report, communication materials, establishment of an online community, newsletters, and a fact sheet with students’ wishes/needs. In this quasi-experimental study, we investigated the effect of these tools in secondary schools on (a) factors perceived by stakeholders as affecting implementation; (b) the quality of implementation. For six months, ten intervention schools implemented the guidelines, supported by the developed implementation tools. Ten control schools received the guidelines without support. School managers, caterers, and canteen employees (n = 33) reported on individual and environmental factors affecting implementation. Implementation quality was determined by dose delivered, dose received, and satisfaction. Stakeholders (n = 24) in intervention schools scored higher on the determinants’ knowledge and motivation and lower on need for support (p < 0.05). Dose received (received and read) and satisfaction was highest for the advisory meeting/report (67.9%, 64.3%, 4.17), communication materials (60.7%, 50.0%, 3.98), and fact sheet (80%, 60%, 4.31). Qualitative analyses confirmed these quantitative results. In conclusion, a combination of implementation tools that includes students’ wishes, tailored information/feedback, reminders and examples of healthier products/accessibility supports stakeholders in creating a healthier school canteen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6887932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68879322019-12-09 Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation Evenhuis, Irma J. Vyth, Ellis L. Veldhuis, Lydian Jacobs, Suzanne M. Seidell, Jacob C. Renders, Carry M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Netherlands Nutrition Centre has developed ‘Guidelines for Healthier Canteens’. To facilitate their implementation, implementation tools were developed: stakeholders’ questionnaires, the ‘Canteen Scan’ (an online tool to assess product availability/accessibility), a tailored advisory meeting/report, communication materials, establishment of an online community, newsletters, and a fact sheet with students’ wishes/needs. In this quasi-experimental study, we investigated the effect of these tools in secondary schools on (a) factors perceived by stakeholders as affecting implementation; (b) the quality of implementation. For six months, ten intervention schools implemented the guidelines, supported by the developed implementation tools. Ten control schools received the guidelines without support. School managers, caterers, and canteen employees (n = 33) reported on individual and environmental factors affecting implementation. Implementation quality was determined by dose delivered, dose received, and satisfaction. Stakeholders (n = 24) in intervention schools scored higher on the determinants’ knowledge and motivation and lower on need for support (p < 0.05). Dose received (received and read) and satisfaction was highest for the advisory meeting/report (67.9%, 64.3%, 4.17), communication materials (60.7%, 50.0%, 3.98), and fact sheet (80%, 60%, 4.31). Qualitative analyses confirmed these quantitative results. In conclusion, a combination of implementation tools that includes students’ wishes, tailored information/feedback, reminders and examples of healthier products/accessibility supports stakeholders in creating a healthier school canteen. MDPI 2019-11-15 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6887932/ /pubmed/31731619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224509 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Evenhuis, Irma J. Vyth, Ellis L. Veldhuis, Lydian Jacobs, Suzanne M. Seidell, Jacob C. Renders, Carry M. Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title | Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title_full | Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title_short | Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation |
title_sort | implementation of guidelines for healthier canteens in dutch secondary schools: a process evaluation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6887932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31731619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evenhuisirmaj implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation AT vythellisl implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation AT veldhuislydian implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation AT jacobssuzannem implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation AT seidelljacobc implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation AT renderscarrym implementationofguidelinesforhealthiercanteensindutchsecondaryschoolsaprocessevaluation |