Cargando…
Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652 |
_version_ | 1783476286760419328 |
---|---|
author | Panea, Begoña Ripoll, Guillermo |
author_facet | Panea, Begoña Ripoll, Guillermo |
author_sort | Panea, Begoña |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purchase intention and a home test. The three PDE groups were control, garlic extract and blended oil composed by carvacrol, timol, cynamic aldehide and eugenol extracts. Meat was packed in film, vacuum or modified atmosphere (MAP) packaging. A visual test was designed comprising a four-day storage step followed by a four-day exposure step in a refrigerated island display case. All studied effects influenced visual appraisal scores, being time exposure and packaging effects more noticeable than PDE or pig-sex effects. Meat from MAP scored higher than the rest. Scores decreased as exposure time increased, but this evolution was less perceptible in vacuum packaging and was faster for meat from the garlic group. Only gender affected the visual appraisal scores, with women scoring higher than men. Neither PDE addition nor pig sex affected to purchase intention whereas both exposure time and packaging type did. A maximum of 2 days of exposure would be recommended. In the home-test, meat from male pigs obtained higher scores than meat from female pigs, and none of the consumer-related effects influenced the given scores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6893813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68938132019-12-23 Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork Panea, Begoña Ripoll, Guillermo Nutrients Article This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purchase intention and a home test. The three PDE groups were control, garlic extract and blended oil composed by carvacrol, timol, cynamic aldehide and eugenol extracts. Meat was packed in film, vacuum or modified atmosphere (MAP) packaging. A visual test was designed comprising a four-day storage step followed by a four-day exposure step in a refrigerated island display case. All studied effects influenced visual appraisal scores, being time exposure and packaging effects more noticeable than PDE or pig-sex effects. Meat from MAP scored higher than the rest. Scores decreased as exposure time increased, but this evolution was less perceptible in vacuum packaging and was faster for meat from the garlic group. Only gender affected the visual appraisal scores, with women scoring higher than men. Neither PDE addition nor pig sex affected to purchase intention whereas both exposure time and packaging type did. A maximum of 2 days of exposure would be recommended. In the home-test, meat from male pigs obtained higher scores than meat from female pigs, and none of the consumer-related effects influenced the given scores. MDPI 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6893813/ /pubmed/31689956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Panea, Begoña Ripoll, Guillermo Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title | Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title_full | Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title_fullStr | Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title_full_unstemmed | Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title_short | Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork |
title_sort | plant-derived extracts feed-addition and packaging type influence consumer sensory perception of pork |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paneabegona plantderivedextractsfeedadditionandpackagingtypeinfluenceconsumersensoryperceptionofpork AT ripollguillermo plantderivedextractsfeedadditionandpackagingtypeinfluenceconsumersensoryperceptionofpork |