Cargando…

Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork

This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panea, Begoña, Ripoll, Guillermo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652
_version_ 1783476286760419328
author Panea, Begoña
Ripoll, Guillermo
author_facet Panea, Begoña
Ripoll, Guillermo
author_sort Panea, Begoña
collection PubMed
description This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purchase intention and a home test. The three PDE groups were control, garlic extract and blended oil composed by carvacrol, timol, cynamic aldehide and eugenol extracts. Meat was packed in film, vacuum or modified atmosphere (MAP) packaging. A visual test was designed comprising a four-day storage step followed by a four-day exposure step in a refrigerated island display case. All studied effects influenced visual appraisal scores, being time exposure and packaging effects more noticeable than PDE or pig-sex effects. Meat from MAP scored higher than the rest. Scores decreased as exposure time increased, but this evolution was less perceptible in vacuum packaging and was faster for meat from the garlic group. Only gender affected the visual appraisal scores, with women scoring higher than men. Neither PDE addition nor pig sex affected to purchase intention whereas both exposure time and packaging type did. A maximum of 2 days of exposure would be recommended. In the home-test, meat from male pigs obtained higher scores than meat from female pigs, and none of the consumer-related effects influenced the given scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6893813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68938132019-12-23 Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork Panea, Begoña Ripoll, Guillermo Nutrients Article This paper investigates whether the combination of the addition of extracts derived from plants (plants derived extracts, PDE) to pork feedstuff and the meat conservation conditions (packaging and time exposure) affect consumers’ perception of pork quality, studied by means of visual appraisal, purchase intention and a home test. The three PDE groups were control, garlic extract and blended oil composed by carvacrol, timol, cynamic aldehide and eugenol extracts. Meat was packed in film, vacuum or modified atmosphere (MAP) packaging. A visual test was designed comprising a four-day storage step followed by a four-day exposure step in a refrigerated island display case. All studied effects influenced visual appraisal scores, being time exposure and packaging effects more noticeable than PDE or pig-sex effects. Meat from MAP scored higher than the rest. Scores decreased as exposure time increased, but this evolution was less perceptible in vacuum packaging and was faster for meat from the garlic group. Only gender affected the visual appraisal scores, with women scoring higher than men. Neither PDE addition nor pig sex affected to purchase intention whereas both exposure time and packaging type did. A maximum of 2 days of exposure would be recommended. In the home-test, meat from male pigs obtained higher scores than meat from female pigs, and none of the consumer-related effects influenced the given scores. MDPI 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6893813/ /pubmed/31689956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panea, Begoña
Ripoll, Guillermo
Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title_full Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title_fullStr Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title_full_unstemmed Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title_short Plant-Derived Extracts Feed-Addition and Packaging Type Influence Consumer Sensory Perception of Pork
title_sort plant-derived extracts feed-addition and packaging type influence consumer sensory perception of pork
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11112652
work_keys_str_mv AT paneabegona plantderivedextractsfeedadditionandpackagingtypeinfluenceconsumersensoryperceptionofpork
AT ripollguillermo plantderivedextractsfeedadditionandpackagingtypeinfluenceconsumersensoryperceptionofpork