Cargando…

Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks

Literally hundreds of statisticians have rightly called for an end to statistical significance testing (Amrhein et al., 2019; Wasserstein et al., 2019). But the practice of arbitrarily thresholding p values is not only deeply embedded in statistical practice, it is also congenial to the human mind....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Born, Richard T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0456-19.2019
_version_ 1783477358189084672
author Born, Richard T.
author_facet Born, Richard T.
author_sort Born, Richard T.
collection PubMed
description Literally hundreds of statisticians have rightly called for an end to statistical significance testing (Amrhein et al., 2019; Wasserstein et al., 2019). But the practice of arbitrarily thresholding p values is not only deeply embedded in statistical practice, it is also congenial to the human mind. It is thus not sufficient to tell our students, “Don’t do this.” We must vividly show them why the practice is wrong and its effects detrimental to scientific progress. I offer three teaching examples I have found to be useful in prompting students to think more deeply about the problem and to begin to interpret the results of statistical procedures as measures of how evidence should change our beliefs, and not as bright lines separating truth from falsehood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69004632019-12-09 Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks Born, Richard T. eNeuro Commentary Literally hundreds of statisticians have rightly called for an end to statistical significance testing (Amrhein et al., 2019; Wasserstein et al., 2019). But the practice of arbitrarily thresholding p values is not only deeply embedded in statistical practice, it is also congenial to the human mind. It is thus not sufficient to tell our students, “Don’t do this.” We must vividly show them why the practice is wrong and its effects detrimental to scientific progress. I offer three teaching examples I have found to be useful in prompting students to think more deeply about the problem and to begin to interpret the results of statistical procedures as measures of how evidence should change our beliefs, and not as bright lines separating truth from falsehood. Society for Neuroscience 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6900463/ /pubmed/31776176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0456-19.2019 Text en Copyright © 2019 Born http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Commentary
Born, Richard T.
Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title_full Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title_fullStr Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title_full_unstemmed Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title_short Banishing “Black/White Thinking”: A Trio of Teaching Tricks
title_sort banishing “black/white thinking”: a trio of teaching tricks
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0456-19.2019
work_keys_str_mv AT bornrichardt banishingblackwhitethinkingatrioofteachingtricks