Cargando…

An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Our current medical curriculum devotes a large percentage of time to knowledge acquisition by means of didactic lectures. Psychomotor skill acquisition takes a back seat. Certain lifesaving skills like basic life support skill training have not even made an appearance in the current cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suseel, Appu, Panchu, Pallavi, Abraham, Siju V, Varghese, Salish, George, Tijo, Joy, Lijo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911741
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23284
_version_ 1783477415009320960
author Suseel, Appu
Panchu, Pallavi
Abraham, Siju V
Varghese, Salish
George, Tijo
Joy, Lijo
author_facet Suseel, Appu
Panchu, Pallavi
Abraham, Siju V
Varghese, Salish
George, Tijo
Joy, Lijo
author_sort Suseel, Appu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Our current medical curriculum devotes a large percentage of time to knowledge acquisition by means of didactic lectures. Psychomotor skill acquisition takes a back seat. Certain lifesaving skills like basic life support skill training have not even made an appearance in the current curriculum. Equal time distribution to cognitive and psychomotor skills should be allotted for MBBS trainees, which is a very practical subject. Simulation can prove to be a valuable tool in imparting skill training. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different teaching modalities in imparting lifesaving skills among first-year MBBS students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 33 first-year students who consented to participate. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. The students were divided into three groups, each undergoing either didactic lecture or animation-based videos or simulation studies. Pretest, posttest, and skills tests were administered to them. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t test were the statistical tests employed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The pretest and posttest scores were comparable in the three groups while the improvement in the posttest scores in all the three groups was significant. The skills test was significantly better in the group undergoing simulation training compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Didactic, animation, and simulation are all good methods in imparting cognitive knowledge, but simulation is the method of choice in imparting psychomotor skills. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: An overhauling of the medical curriculum to include more skills training to the budding doctors using simulation-based techniques is recommended. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Suseel A, Panchu P, Abraham SV, Varghese S, George T, Joy L. An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study. IJCCM 2019;23(11): 509–512.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69008832020-01-07 An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study Suseel, Appu Panchu, Pallavi Abraham, Siju V Varghese, Salish George, Tijo Joy, Lijo Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Our current medical curriculum devotes a large percentage of time to knowledge acquisition by means of didactic lectures. Psychomotor skill acquisition takes a back seat. Certain lifesaving skills like basic life support skill training have not even made an appearance in the current curriculum. Equal time distribution to cognitive and psychomotor skills should be allotted for MBBS trainees, which is a very practical subject. Simulation can prove to be a valuable tool in imparting skill training. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different teaching modalities in imparting lifesaving skills among first-year MBBS students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 33 first-year students who consented to participate. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. The students were divided into three groups, each undergoing either didactic lecture or animation-based videos or simulation studies. Pretest, posttest, and skills tests were administered to them. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t test were the statistical tests employed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The pretest and posttest scores were comparable in the three groups while the improvement in the posttest scores in all the three groups was significant. The skills test was significantly better in the group undergoing simulation training compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Didactic, animation, and simulation are all good methods in imparting cognitive knowledge, but simulation is the method of choice in imparting psychomotor skills. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: An overhauling of the medical curriculum to include more skills training to the budding doctors using simulation-based techniques is recommended. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Suseel A, Panchu P, Abraham SV, Varghese S, George T, Joy L. An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study. IJCCM 2019;23(11): 509–512. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6900883/ /pubmed/31911741 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23284 Text en Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Suseel, Appu
Panchu, Pallavi
Abraham, Siju V
Varghese, Salish
George, Tijo
Joy, Lijo
An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title_full An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title_short An Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Teaching Modalities in Imparting Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills among First-year Medical Students: A Pilot Study
title_sort analysis of the efficacy of different teaching modalities in imparting adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills among first-year medical students: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911741
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23284
work_keys_str_mv AT suseelappu ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT panchupallavi ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT abrahamsijuv ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT varghesesalish ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT georgetijo ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT joylijo ananalysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT suseelappu analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT panchupallavi analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT abrahamsijuv analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT varghesesalish analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT georgetijo analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy
AT joylijo analysisoftheefficacyofdifferentteachingmodalitiesinimpartingadultcardiopulmonaryresuscitationskillsamongfirstyearmedicalstudentsapilotstudy