Cargando…

Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education

Qualitative research approach could be as important as quantitative one, particularly in medical education, as long as it meets the common goal of both—improving the quality of education. In contrary to the end—i.e. achieving the common goals, the means of both approaches of inquiry is different. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ataro, Getu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013
_version_ 1783478893185859584
author Ataro, Getu
author_facet Ataro, Getu
author_sort Ataro, Getu
collection PubMed
description Qualitative research approach could be as important as quantitative one, particularly in medical education, as long as it meets the common goal of both—improving the quality of education. In contrary to the end—i.e. achieving the common goals, the means of both approaches of inquiry is different. Their dissimilarity in the means or process is not confined to data collection techniques, study designs or analysis methods; but, they also differ in assumptions about the world, reality, science and knowledge. Implicitly or explicitly, these assumptions are revealed in a researcher's discussion about philosophical assumptions and research paradigms. The researcher's inclination towards any of paradigms and assumption in light of the most common philosophical concepts such as ontology, epistemology and methodology results in choice of either of the dominant research paradigms to follow such as objectivism/positivism and interpretivisim/constructivism. This is common practice in the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy of research world disregarding the emerging mixed approach with predominantly pragmatism paradigm. Besides framing the methodology of the study, researcher's explicit description of philosophical assumptions and paradigms helps readers easily understand study findings. Many authors from both dominant traditions fail to describe this important aspect of the research in their published works. In our study, the ontological and epistemological assumptions led us choose interpretivist/constructivist paradigm and phenomenological qualitative approach with Collaizi's descriptive phenomenological analysis adapted to our context. The experience and lesson learned from the study found to be worse sharing in a modified and extended construct of methodology part. Therefore, this article deals with philosophical positions, research paradigms and traditions that led to the specific qualitative approach from the perspective of methodology part in our study about objective structure clinical examination (OSCE) experience in a medical department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69091372019-12-23 Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education Ataro, Getu Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review Article Qualitative research approach could be as important as quantitative one, particularly in medical education, as long as it meets the common goal of both—improving the quality of education. In contrary to the end—i.e. achieving the common goals, the means of both approaches of inquiry is different. Their dissimilarity in the means or process is not confined to data collection techniques, study designs or analysis methods; but, they also differ in assumptions about the world, reality, science and knowledge. Implicitly or explicitly, these assumptions are revealed in a researcher's discussion about philosophical assumptions and research paradigms. The researcher's inclination towards any of paradigms and assumption in light of the most common philosophical concepts such as ontology, epistemology and methodology results in choice of either of the dominant research paradigms to follow such as objectivism/positivism and interpretivisim/constructivism. This is common practice in the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy of research world disregarding the emerging mixed approach with predominantly pragmatism paradigm. Besides framing the methodology of the study, researcher's explicit description of philosophical assumptions and paradigms helps readers easily understand study findings. Many authors from both dominant traditions fail to describe this important aspect of the research in their published works. In our study, the ontological and epistemological assumptions led us choose interpretivist/constructivist paradigm and phenomenological qualitative approach with Collaizi's descriptive phenomenological analysis adapted to our context. The experience and lesson learned from the study found to be worse sharing in a modified and extended construct of methodology part. Therefore, this article deals with philosophical positions, research paradigms and traditions that led to the specific qualitative approach from the perspective of methodology part in our study about objective structure clinical examination (OSCE) experience in a medical department. Elsevier 2019-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6909137/ /pubmed/31871678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013 Text en © 2019 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Ataro, Getu
Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title_full Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title_fullStr Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title_full_unstemmed Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title_short Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
title_sort methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about osce experience: overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013
work_keys_str_mv AT atarogetu methodsmethodologicalchallengesandlessonlearnedfromphenomenologicalstudyaboutosceexperienceoverviewofparadigmdrivenqualitativeapproachinmedicaleducation