Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

BACKGROUND: Peer reviewed research is paramount to the advancement of science. Ideally, the peer review process is an unbiased, fair assessment of the scientific merit and credibility of a study; however, well-documented biases arise in all methods of peer review. Systemic biases have been shown to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silbiger, Nyssa J., Stubler, Amber D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Ethical Issues
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844596
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844596
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247

Ejemplares similares